# Daily Challenge #14 - Square into Squares

Good morning, all.

This challenge finishes our second week of the Daily Challenge series. It'll be our most difficult challenge yet!

We are grateful to user g964, who posted this challenge and many others on CodeWars.

Given a positive integer n, return a strictly increasing sequence of numbers so that the sum of the squares is equal to n².

If there are multiple solutions, return the result with the largest possible value:

For example: decompose(11) must return [1,2,4,10].

Note: there are actually two ways to decompose 11², 11² = 121 = 1 + 4 + 16 + 100 = 1² + 2² + 4² + 10² but you shouldn't return [2,6,9], since 9 is smaller than 10.

Hint: Very often will xk be n-1.

Good luck and happy coding!

Thank you to CodeWars, who has licensed redistribution of this challenge under the 2-Clause BSD License!

### Discussion I think this works for JavaScript:

function squaresTotaling(max, goal) {
if (max ** 2 === goal) return [max];
if (goal <= 0 || max <= 0) return null;
const subProblem = squaresTotaling(max - 1, goal - max ** 2);
if (subProblem) return [...subProblem, max];
return squaresTotaling(max - 1, goal);
}

function decompose(val) {
return squaresTotaling(val - 1, val ** 2);
}


JavaScript

const decompose = number => {
let components = [];
let modifier = 1;
do {
// initialize the values before the loop
components = [];
let remaining = number ** 2;

// from number - 1 until 1 check if the square of the number is less than the remaining
for (let number = Math.floor(Math.sqrt(remaining)) - modifier; remaining > 0 && number > 0; number--) {
if (number**2 <= remaining) {
components.push(number);
remaining -= number**2;
// if a squared component is found, continue from the square root of the remaining
number = Math.floor(Math.sqrt(remaining)) + 1;
}
}
// the modifier is used to check for the next set of
modifier++;
// do this while there are duplicates (duplicates mean that one number -in particular 1- was repeated)
// this code is a variation of https://stackoverflow.com/a/34192063/3695983
} while (components.length !== new Set(components).size);
return components.reverse();
}


And a live demo on CodePen.

Not really inspired lately, my code is getting bigger and messier... and I'm running behind on these challenges :-/

I feel ya! Me tooooo

I got this one started but ran into a tougher example that I haven't worked through yet! Definitely want to get it wrapped up but I'm definitely not doing 1 a day anymore

Here is my Rust version!

I started with an iterative solution, but I was working off a simplifying assumption that turned out to be false once I starting testing larger examples.

After I realized my simplification wasn't going to work I went for a recursive solution. I think it turned out pretty well! I also got to try out my first Macro in Rust so that was cool!

fn decompose_recursive(goal: u32, i: u32, curr: Vec<u32>) -> Option<Vec<u32>> {
macro_rules! try_recusing {
( $goal:expr,$i:expr, $next:expr ) => {{ let attempt = decompose_recursive($goal, $i,$next);

if attempt.is_some() {
return attempt;
}
}};
}

if goal == 0 {
return Some(curr);
}

if i <= 0 {
return None;
}

if goal >= i.pow(2) {
let mut next = curr.clone();
next.push(i);

try_recusing!(goal - i.pow(2), i - 1, next);
}

try_recusing!(goal, i - 1, curr);

None
}

pub fn decompose(n: u32) -> Option<Vec<u32>> {
let reverse_vec = decompose_recursive(n.pow(2), n - 1, vec![])?;
let vec = reverse_vec.iter().rev().cloned().collect();
Some(vec)
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use crate::*;

#[test]
fn it_works_for_a_nonexistant_example() {
assert_eq!(decompose(4), None);
}

#[test]
fn it_works_for_the_dev_to_example() {
assert_eq!(decompose(11), Some(vec![1, 2, 4, 10]));
}

#[test]
fn it_works_for_50() {
assert_eq!(decompose(50), Some(vec![1, 3, 5, 8, 49]));
}
}


Perl solution, using recursion:

#!/usr/bin/perl
use warnings;
use strict;

sub _decompose {
my ($n,$target, $decomposition,$sum) = @_;

return $decomposition if$target == $sum; my$smaller = int sqrt $n - 1; while ($smaller) {
my $small_square =$smaller ** 2;
if ($sum +$small_square <= $target) { my$d = _decompose(
$smaller ** 2,$target,
[ $smaller, @$decomposition ], $sum +$smaller ** 2
);
return $d if @$d;
}
--$smaller; } return [] } sub decompose { my ($n) = @_;
my $square =$n ** 2;
return _decompose($square,$square, [], 0)
}

use Test::More tests => 2;
is_deeply decompose(11), [1, 2, 4, 10], 'eleven';
is_deeply decompose(12), [1, 2, 3, 7, 9], 'twelve';


I added 12 as a test, too, because for 12, 11 is not part of its decomposition.

Python solution:

def decompose(n):
if n == 0:
return -1
elif n == 1:
return 

array_power=[pow(i,2) for i in range(1,n)]          #array with powers [1^2,2^2,3^2...,(n-1)^2]
array_power=array_power[::-1]
array_help,power,i,j=[],pow(n,2),0,n-1              # power= n^2, i=element(array), j= base of the power

while power > 0:
if power >= array_power[i]:
power-=array_power[i]
array_help.append(j)
i+=1
j-=1
if i == n-1 and power > 0:
return [n]
return array_help[::-1]

print(decompose(1))


This is the use full blog here most people have to seen it and save the batter update of euchre free online really thanks for the share me it is the amazing.  