Welcome to the SQL showdown series!
I'm committing to publishing a SQL challenge every day for 30 days. In each post I'll describe my solution to the last day's challenge. I'll follow that up with a full description of the challenge for the next day.
Write your own solution in the comments! Let's see who can come up with the most creative solutions.
I'll add connection details for a PostgreSQL database containing test data for the challenge. Solutions are by no means limited to PostgreSQL, but it's there if you want an easy way to test your query!
In this challenge we'll explore the idea of grouping sets by rolling up data in several different ways.
The question for today is:
Given supermarket sales history, can you display sales not only by location and category, but also at the month and yearly level?
Here's an example to give you a better idea of the output you're after:
As you can see above, sales are summed up at the month level, but each location/product combination also has a subtotal row for the year.
The day7 schema contains only the supermarket table. Here's a sample of that table:
I have a PostgreSQL database ready for you to play with.
The password is the same as the username! To query the **** table:
SELECT * FROM day7.supermarket;
This is the question we were trying to answer with yesterday's SQL challenge:
Given supermarket sales history by location and category, can you produce a report without gaps? In other words, if the Mandalay location had no sales in the home and lifestyle category on a certain day, we'd still like to see a row with zero.
If you've done data analysis for a while, you've probably had this requirement come up. Understandably, users would rather see a row with a default zero value than a missing time range on a report.
My solution is to generate all of the possible combinations first, and then join to the actual sales data to display that when it's available.
In this case, we have locations, categories, and dates. There are 3 stores and 6 categories, so that should produce 18 rows. Generating the dates is probably the trickiest part of this, but PostgreSQL provides a handy function that makes life easier in that regard.
First, let's take a look at the solution and then we'll work through it.
SELECT keys.city, keys.product_line, coalesce(total, 0) AS total, keys.sale_date FROM ( WITH date_range AS ( SELECT min(sale_date) AS min_date, max(sale_date) AS max_date FROM day6.supermarket ) SELECT * FROM ( SELECT distinct city FROM day6.supermarket ) s1 CROSS JOIN ( SELECT distinct product_line FROM day6.supermarket ) AS s2 CROSS JOIN ( SELECT generate_series(min_date, max_date, INTERVAL '1 day') AS sale_date FROM date_range ) AS s3 ) AS keys LEFT JOIN day6.supermarket s ON keys.city = s.city AND keys.product_line = s.product_line AND keys.sale_date = s.sale_date;
The final select uses coalesce to turn NULL into zero where there was no actual sales data. I then use a common table expression to get the first and last day of sales, which is fed into generate_series to produce every day between those dates.
That gives us every day, but we still need to pair that up with store locations and categories. This is where the reclusive, rarely seen CROSS JOIN comes into play. If you've never seen one, it's equivalent to writing a JOIN with an ON clause of 1=1 or true, which gives us every possible combination.
Now that we have every combination, we can LEFT JOIN to the sales data. I'm using a LEFT JOIN because I want a row even where there was no matching sale.
Have fun, and I can't wait to see what you come up with! I'll be back tomorrow with a solution to this problem and a new challenge.