image created by Margaux Peltat for the Chilled Cow YouTube channel
Time for #DevDiscuss β right here on DEV π
Inspired by @cocoandrew's Top 7 post, tonightβs topic is...uses of WebAssembly!
Questions:
- What are the best uses for WebAssembly, in your experience?
- When should you avoid using WebAssembly?
- Do you have any stories of WebAssembly triumphs and/or fails?
Top comments (13)
I think in a lot of ways, WebAssembly to me is the web's transition from being "documents that we hacked a lot of stuff on top of" to more of a true open-ended computing platform.
With that being said, I feel like the best use cases for WebAssembly these days are types of applications which have existed in other forms, can leverage the strengths of the web (convenience, ubiquity), and generally have utility.
I think games, and graphically intense "experiences" win out as some of the best directions to go in for useful WebAssembly applications, IMO.
Plus the ability to code for the web in languages other than JS/TS - I think that might at some point be or become a pretty broad use case ...
Indeed
I totally agree with you
I would say Wasm Is the future because it provides a faster and more secure tech space for developers. Wasm is creating standards to make it more powerful with the new emerging technologies
WebAssembly looks like the best way to migrate large legacy applications to the web sandbox, which can provide us with safer apps using modern features. However, if you're starting from scratch it seems like a real pain to do all the extra programming and UI work.
Yes, it can really be a pain in the neck at first, but later on, it gets simpler
I think "Web" in "WebAssembly" is somewhat misleading. WebAssembly is a general purpose platform-independent compilation target. All kinds of dynamically loadable code - plugins, modules, etc. etc. will benefit from that. No need to limit user to one language anymore (and even no need to implement language) while still providing ability to customize/extend application via plugins/modules. Of course, web-based apps will remain, but I think they will not be a main use case.
One of (perhaps somewhat unexpected) uses of WebAssembly - implementation of new smart contract programming language in future version of Radix Network: Scrypto. I believe it will be a huge triumph of WebAssembly.
Wanted to share that if you enjoyed this topic, you might like the Wasm Builders Community:
Wasm Builders π§±
Learn, connect, and showcase everything to do with WebAssembly; an emerging technology powering web, cloud, IOT, and more!
Thank you βΊοΈ
I had used Emscripten since 2015 , i used it for porting ffmpeg to web , to encode audio and video and convert to different format on the fly. Later it was ported to WASM .
Porting C/C++ libs is very good usecase , other than that , i don't use because when it comes to software development , performance is second priority , productivity always wins over performance and JS can cover all what WASM does.
A lot of processing can be handled with webassembly and with wasi and rust it gets better on the backend.
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.