DEV Community

Cover image for How to make Dynamic Text Overlays on Images

How to make Dynamic Text Overlays on Images

Sarthak Sharma on February 07, 2019

If you've ever made a webapp, you must be familiar with this scenario. So many times, you find yourself in a situation where you have to put some t...
Collapse
 
link2twenty profile image
Andrew Bone

There are hacky CSS ways to do this, though I'd never suggest using them.

Collapse
 
shayd16 profile image
Shayne Darren

I'm really not familiar with CSS, what exactly is hacky about it?

Collapse
 
link2twenty profile image
Andrew Bone

It's these 3 lines that I don't like.

{
  background-clip: text;
  color: transparent;
  filter: invert(1) grayscale(1) contrast(9);
}

What we're doing is

  • removing bits of the span not covered by text
  • making the text invisible
  • applying filters to the span
    • inverting the colour
    • setting it to grayscale
    • setting the contrast high so we just get black and white.

But it doesn't know where the text is over the image, so it gets the colours from the top left corner.

Thread Thread
 
link2twenty profile image
Andrew Bone • Edited

There is a slightly less hacky option in the works but, currently, it doesn't work with background-clip. It's called background-filter

example

webdesign.tutsplus.com/tutorials/c...

Thread Thread
 
sarthology profile image
Sarthak Sharma

That’s cool

Thread Thread
 
kenbellows profile image
Ken Bellows

@link2twenty As I read your "why's it hacky" explanation, my thoughts were:

Nah, that's not hacky, that's brilliant.
Still not hacky.
Still loving it.
Grayscale? Such a cool idea.
And contrast to finish. Perfect. Why is any of this hacky?

"But it doesn't know where the text is over the image, so it gets the colours from the top left corner." -- Ahhhhh.... and that's where the hack hits the fan.

So close!

Collapse
 
jonrandy profile image
Jon Randy 🎖️ • Edited

Far from perfect. The isDark function is extremely naive. For example - if the image has a patch of light or dark that lines up with the text, and the rest of the image is of the opposite 'lightness', you are going to end up with unreadable text again.

What you need to do is test the part of the image that is actually underneath the text

Collapse
 
sarthology profile image
Sarthak Sharma

That's also doable, using the same concept and some more work in canvas.

Collapse
 
lysofdev profile image
Esteban Hernández

Would it be possible to identify the subset of pixels that represent the area under the text from the image data? Then we could reapply the algorithm to a smaller size making it significantly less complex. My main concern with the original implementation would be the cost of scanning a high-resolution image. The profiling algorithm could probably be best applied after the upload on the upload service itself and store the profiling data with the image then we can just fetch the image and it's profiling data and don't have to scan it on client's device.

Thread Thread
 
sarthology profile image
Sarthak Sharma

I think it can be. But it might take a lot of werid calculations to do something like that. But I’m up for the challenge. 😎

Thread Thread
 
kenbellows profile image
Ken Bellows • Edited

It's not too bad as long as you know (or can get) three things:

  • the size the image will be when rendered
  • the pixel position of the text relative to the top-left corner of the image
  • the approximate height and width of the text when rendered

That last bit is the hard part, especially if there's any line breaks involved. But after you have those, it's basically this:

const start = { x: img left + text rel left, y: img top + text rel top }
const end = { x: img left + text rel left + text width, y: img top + text rel top + text height }
for (const x = start.x; x < end.x; x++) {
  for (const y = start.y; y < end.y; y++) {
    const p = (canvas.width * y + x) * 4
    const [r, g, b] =[].slice.call(data, p, p+3)
    // fancy logic of choice
  }
}
Collapse
 
qm3ster profile image
Mihail Malo

I'd suggest a shadow/outline for most practical uses.
For one thing, you are calculating the average of the whole image.
But imagine if most of the image is white, while exactly where the text goes is a black rectangle?
Then you have to calculate that exact position.
But what if that area is striped?

@link2twenty 's "hacky" CSS solutions will probably be more performant AND more effective, being able to invert the image color with the text.

Collapse
 
bassemibrahim profile image
Bassem

Totally awesome! I faced this issue quite alot, always fixed it using a darker overlay on the image ( the easy way ). Would totally like to join on the npm package. But i am wondering what would happen if its a high res image. Would it take a while to go through all the pixels ?

Collapse
 
sarthology profile image
Sarthak Sharma

Well, in current example both images used are of huge resolutions.So they take approximately same amount of time as browser take to render it.

Collapse
 
dechamp profile image
DeChamp

This is amazing!!!! How fun. I really enjoyed the entire turorial and learned a lot. Very well explained and made perfect sense. Thank you!

Collapse
 
sarthology profile image
Sarthak Sharma

Thanks Dechamp !!

Collapse
 
trjones1 profile image
Tramel Jones

Great article. Thanks - I learned a lot.

Collapse
 
sarthology profile image
Sarthak Sharma

😊

Collapse
 
vintharas profile image
Jaime González García

Fun hack!! Thanks for writing 😄👍

Collapse
 
sarthology profile image
Sarthak Sharma

😊

Collapse
 
jackharner profile image
Jack Harner 🚀

I'd never really thought about the fact that averaging the R G & B values of a color would get the lightness. It makes sense, it's just never something I'd thought about. Great write up.

Collapse
 
sarthology profile image
Sarthak Sharma

Thanks Jack

Collapse
 
sarthology profile image
Sarthak Sharma

Great post, thanks for sharing it man. 👍

Collapse
 
vikasyadav72 profile image
Vikas Yadav

Any way to do this using CSS filter?

Collapse
 
sarthology profile image
Sarthak Sharma

Check comment from andrew. It’s good one.