DEV Community

Rohit Bhandari
Rohit Bhandari

Posted on • Originally published at quordle.us

5 Reasons to Go for AI Automation Testing

Image description
Testing software manually can be tedious as well as time-consuming. With artificial intelligence (AI) along with machine learning advancing rapidly, AI automation testing is becoming a popular choice for streamlining the testing process. Here are 5 compelling reasons why companies should leverage AI for test automation:

Faster Test Cycles

Manual testing is extremely time consuming as testers need to manually develop test cases, set up data, execute tests, and verify results. Exhaustively testing an entire application via manual testing can stretch on for days or even weeks. With AI test automation, test execution is lightning fast. AI algorithms can rapidly process through multiple test scenarios by automatically generating optimized test data and executing tests in parallel. Unlike human testers limited to 8-hour work days, AI testing tools can run 24/7 to provide rapid feedback. Bugs that may take weeks to surface during manual testing are quickly identified and flagged for resolution during AI test cycles measured in hours rather than days.

Greater Test Coverage

Manual testing is limited by human blindspots. Testers design test cases based on their subjective knowledge, which provides only selective test coverage. However, AI testing tools systematically explore thousands of test scenarios, including many that human testers would never conceive of. AI algorithms intelligently generate randomized test data to cover edge cases. They mutate and combine inputs to create new and unexpected data combinations for greater test coverage. Unlike manual testers restricted to happy path testing, AI can automatically generate negative tests to account for bad data. With exhaustive scenario testing, AI tools stimulate parts of an application that human testing would never reach.

Reduced Effort and Costs

AI testing eliminates the need for manual test case creation, execution, and reporting. Automated testing also reduces the number of human testers required. With automated AI tools continuously testing overnight and on weekends, testing can be scaled while freeing up valuable human time. Ultimately, AI automation leads to lower QA costs and maximizes utilization of skilled testing resources.

Adaptive Testing

Unlike manual testing with predefined scenarios, AI testing is adaptive in nature. AI algorithms can analyze test results to detect new defects or problematic areas of an application to optimize future tests. Bugs that go undetected by humans can be learned by AI models for smarter test creation and execution. This adaptability leads to improved test coverage over time.

Objective Result Analysis

Humans can introduce biases when assessing test results. An AI algorithm objectively analyzes test data without any biases. This ensures any faults are accurately identified for resolution. When integrated with DevOps pipelines, unbiased AI-powered testing provides objective quality gates to prevent flawed code from being released.

Conclusion
Testing remains a bottleneck in the software development lifecycle. With the right approach, AI test automation can help test faster, cheaper, and more effectively. Companies need to invest in building AI testing competency to stay competitive. As AI capabilities continue to evolve, AI will become indispensable for delivering quality software at speed. Forward-thinking organizations are already realizing the benefits of AI test automation today through real-world deployments. The future has arrived, and AI promises to be a game-changer for software testing.

Opkey is a revolutionary test automation platform that utilizes artificial intelligence to streamline the testing process. Through AI-based change impact assessment and automatic identification of broken scripts, it ensures teams only run necessary test cases to maximize coverage while minimizing time spent. By autonomously healing scripts without human effort, Opkey solves the historically tedious problem of test maintenance. With features like effortless change assessment and recommendation of relevant tests, it saves QA teams substantial time and resources.

Top comments (0)