DEV Community

Cover image for Should you reply to all LinkedIn messages from recruiters?
Dan Newton
Dan Newton

Posted on

Should you reply to all LinkedIn messages from recruiters?

This is something that I used to be good at but recently I have been falling behind. When I say this, I mean that I haven't replied to a LinkedIn message for a few months now.

There are so many now that I can't even bring myself to start clearing out the backlog.

Really I am just being lazy. But, in doing so, am I annoying or hurting the feelings of the recruiter messaging me. Furthermore, am I doing damage to myself if I ever need to find a new position and might need help from some recruiters.

What are your opinions?

Do you answer every message sent your way?

Do you do it straight away?

If you are a recruiter, it would be interesting to hear your opinion since you're also affected by this.

Top comments (16)

Collapse
 
dmfay profile image
Dian Fay • Edited

You aren't hurting anybody's feelings when you leave a recruiter on read. They're not feverishly checking back, hoping against hope for a response from you in particular; they're messaging as many people as they can trying to get as many responses as they can in general. One more or less doesn't make a difference.

You aren't hurting your own prospects by ignoring recruiters. They provide a service, and if you don't need their service engaging with them is pointless (it arguably wastes a minute of their time and gets their hopes up, too!). If you do need them, they won't care how many solicitations you've previously ignored, because they're focused on filling this role in the here and now. Establishing a relationship with a recruiter you know has good leads can be useful, but there's no need to do that ahead of time.

Talk to recruiters on your terms, not theirs.

Collapse
 
willemwijnans profile image
Willem Wijnans • Edited

they're messaging as many people as they can trying to get as many responses as they can in general.

Not all of us are like that Dian ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿš€

I think it comes down to this: Agency recruiters are playing the numbers game, and have zero knowledge about the field they are hiring for -- avoid them ๐Ÿ”ด

In-house recruiters, who own the hiring at their company, probably are worth replying to as they less often send out a mass email and did their job researching you a bit.

Collapse
 
dmfay profile image
Dian Fay

I've worked with good recruiters! I'm glad you all are out there! I'm still not going to waste both of our time if I already know I don't want to change jobs at present :)

Thread Thread
 
willemwijnans profile image
Willem Wijnans

Hahahahaha :)

Collapse
 
willemwijnans profile image
Willem Wijnans • Edited

Hi Dan, ๐Ÿ‘‹

I am responsible for tech hiring at Aula.Education. I only send out highly personal and relevant messages to our prospects and think I have a 70% reply rate. I spend quite a lot of time researching and crafting a message.

I won't lie, that if I don't hear back, I am not disappointed. But most of the time they come back to me 3 months later in the end when they are clearing out their backlog ๐Ÿคฃ

The way I see it: if you only send highly relevant outreach, you will stand out most of the times and I see the PM's / Devs I reach out to most of the time take the time go get back.

FYI: Recruiters get recruited as well, mostly by automated Linkedin scattergun approaches -- and I delete those on sight.

Cheers, Willem

Collapse
 
erikwhiting88 profile image
Erik

you're a rarity. most messages I get from recruiters are like "you look like a great fit for this position working with insert technology I've never used before" so thanks for being one of the good ones

Collapse
 
theaccordance profile image
Joe Mainwaring • Edited

I ignore 99% of recruiters who find their way to my inbox. Most who attempt to contact me haven't done basic due diligence, asking me to take a demotion & pay cut to fill a role I would have been excited for 5+ years ago.

Then there are the terrible ones - those who never take you off their contact lists after you've politely asked, and the ones who send Java roles to JavaScript developers ๐Ÿ™„

Collapse
 
dianawebdev profile image
Diana

I get a lot of copy-paste ABAP-related messages because I worked in an SAP-environment some time ago (and never will do it again). I'm only answering to the messages that are clearly written to me as a person and not to "someone" who is matching a search pattern.
Which is good, because I got my current job like this.

Collapse
 
erikwhiting88 profile image
Erik • Edited

I always reply, but most of the time I don't want to.

I always think "what if it's that guy's first day?" I know it's highly highly unlikely but I know I've sent messages before that might be interpreted as spam, and I always feel just a tiny bit sad when they're ignored so I always at least thank them and then decline.

Collapse
 
lankydandev profile image
Dan Newton

I always wondered if I should try those responses but felt that they were a bit rude. Although, as you said, probably better than not responding like me...

Collapse
 
molly profile image
Molly Struve (she/her)

I only respond to the pesky persistent ones. I have found that if I respond with a polite no they will leave me alone. I have not had anyone ignore a polite no yet, but then again, I am only 6 years in so there is still time!

Collapse
 
nickytonline profile image
Nick Taylor

I only reply to a recruiter on LinkedIn or elsewhere, if it's very clear that they took at least a few seconds to personalize the message. If it's a generic one I ignore it.

Collapse
 
matthewdunbar1 profile image
Matthew Dunbar

I try to respond, even if to just say I'm not interested. I know that recruiters get some sort of return credit for the message if you respond, even if you respond negatively.

Collapse
 
sebastiangperez profile image
Sebastiangperez

I say no, this HHRR companies are trying to fill up a database with you.