DEV Community

Cover image for Improve TypeScript Omit type
Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Przemyslaw Jan Beigert

Posted on • Updated on

Improve TypeScript Omit type

Introduction

Builded Omit type can be very useful

e.g.:

interface Obj {
  key1: string;
  key2: number;
}

type R1 = Omit<Obj, 'key1'>; // { key2: number }
type R2 = Omit<Obj, 'key2'>; // { key1: string }
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

However there's one disadvantage.

interface Obj {
  key1: string;
  key2: number;
}

type R1 = Omit<Obj, 'kye1'>; // { key1: string; key2: number }
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Omitting a key that doesn't exist is pointless, so I'll expect some error.

Implementation

Omit type looks like this:

type Omit<T, K extends keyof any> = Pick<T, Exclude<keyof T, K>>;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Problem is that K is not key of anything, it's a key of this object. So let's change it:

// type.utils.ts
export type Omit2<T extends {}, K extends keyof T> = Pick<T, Exclude<keyof T, K>>;

interface Obj {
  key1: string;
  key2: number;
}

type R1 = Omit2<Obj, 'kye1'>; // Type '"kye1"' does not satisfy the constraint 'keyof Obj'.(2344)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Installation

Now we have to ensure that Omit2 will be used instead of Omit. I've no idea how to overwrite something from es5.d.ts, however we can ban Omit using eslint.

// eslintrc.js

module.exports = {
  parser: '@typescript-eslint/parser',
  plugins: ['@typescript-eslint'],
  rules: {
    "@typescript-eslint/ban-types": [
      "error",
      {
        "types": {
          "Omit": "Use Omit2 from type.utils instead",
        },
        "extendDefaults": true
      }
    ]
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Then if someone forgot about the presence of Omit2 eslint will throw an error with a proper message.

Summary

It's not a big improvement but maybe it will catch a bug or two.

Read more

Checkout discussion about strict-ness of Omit. https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/30825

Oldest comments (4)

Collapse
 
skyjur profile image
Ski

Or just don't use Omit dev.to/skyjur/your-code-probably-d...

Collapse
 
przemyslawjanbeigert profile image
Przemyslaw Jan Beigert

If you decide to abandon Omit, you can use ban-types rule from last snippet to enforce that. However I don't recommend that.

Collapse
 
skyjur profile image
Ski • Edited

Interesting idea, didn't think about it but indeed in many projects it could be profitable to add Omit - to banned types by default - since my observation is that it's been misused more often than it improved anything. Something developers need to understand is that as time passes languages acquire more and more features. Not all features is necessary in every project. It is smart to select small subset of features and techniques that you'll use in your project instead of opt in for everything that community has ever invented.

Thread Thread
 
przemyslawjanbeigert profile image
Przemyslaw Jan Beigert

Oh, complexity of TypeScript is a topic for another conversation :D