It is a common misconception about "serverless". Of course you are right: You don't actually host a website without a server.
Quote from Wikipedia:
Serverless computing is a cloud-computing execution model in which the cloud provider runs the server, and dynamically manages the allocation of machine resources.
It is about some provider manages the server and it's allocations. In "serverless" you don't have a fixed server with a fixed IP but a dynamically managed server.
In my opinion "serverless" therefore is a misleading description.
EDIT: Think about you being "serveless" rather than the application.
Sorry for being slow, but I don't understand how that makes them serverless. Is "serverless" being used as a synonym for "headless", i.e. it has no user interface?
Serverless basic means that you don't care about the server. You write a function (Azure), or a lambda (aws), and the provider handle the server for you.
It just means that the templates are not being rendered on the server but rather on the front end by doing an Ajax call to the server and then fill in the data with JS.
So it's serverless ... with a server :)
And of course the website still has to be hosted on a server as well.
The serverless name makes no sense at all.
Even if you host it on aws or firebase it still acts as a server.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I am very confused by "serverless". How do you host a website without a server? Where does the content come from if it's not served from somewhere?
It is a common misconception about "serverless". Of course you are right: You don't actually host a website without a server.
Quote from Wikipedia:
It is about some provider manages the server and it's allocations. In "serverless" you don't have a fixed server with a fixed IP but a dynamically managed server.
In my opinion "serverless" therefore is a misleading description.
EDIT: Think about you being "serveless" rather than the application.
Ah! OK, thank you. So it's not about not having a server, but about not caring about the server. Got it.
You got it :)
Btw: I was thinking exactly the same for a time...
There is some that can be installed in lambda services like aws or firebase. Some cannot like strapi.
Sorry for being slow, but I don't understand how that makes them serverless. Is "serverless" being used as a synonym for "headless", i.e. it has no user interface?
Serverless basic means that you don't care about the server. You write a function (Azure), or a lambda (aws), and the provider handle the server for you.
It just means that the templates are not being rendered on the server but rather on the front end by doing an Ajax call to the server and then fill in the data with JS.
So it's serverless ... with a server :)
And of course the website still has to be hosted on a server as well.
The serverless name makes no sense at all.
Even if you host it on aws or firebase it still acts as a server.