DEV Community

Cover image for The Advantages of Bun: When to Choose it Over Node.js πŸ”₯
Leslie Gyamfi
Leslie Gyamfi

Posted on

The Advantages of Bun: When to Choose it Over Node.js πŸ”₯

Node has long been the dominant force in server-side JavaScript runtime environments. However, a new contender has emerged: Bun. Bun promises significant performance improvements and a streamlined developer experience, making it a compelling choice for certain projects. This article explores Bun's advantages and the situations where it might be a better fit than Node.js.

In this article, we will learn about Bun and Node.js, their characteristics, and some instances where Bun is a better substitute for Node.js - have a read!

What are Nodejs and Bun?

Node.js is the most popular JavaScript runtime for server-side development. It’s supported by a vast ecosystem of npm packages and a vast community. It has been around for much longer and has a well-developed ecosystem of libraries, frameworks, and tools. This makes finding solutions for various project tasks easier: APIs, backends, etc.

Bun, on the other hand, is a new JavaScript runtime environment that offers built-in support for TypeScript without needing extra configuration. It directly integrates a package manager, bundler, and transpiler, streamlining the development process and reducing complexity. One thing about Bun is that it starts up applications significantly faster and executes code efficiently. Thanks to its use of the JavaScriptCore engine.

Bun vs Nodejs: The Good and the Bad ➰

Here's a breakdown of the individual strengths and weaknesses of Bun and Nodejs to help you decide which one is better for your project. Time to learn!

The GoodπŸ”₯:

  • Blazing Speed: Bun shines in performance. It boasts significantly faster startup times thanks to the Zig language and faster execution speeds due to the JavaScriptCore engine.

  • Native TypeScript Support: Bun offers built-in support for TypeScript, allowing for type-safe code without extra configuration.

  • Faster Package Management: Bun's package manager, bun install, is much faster than npm, reducing development iteration times.

The BadπŸ‘ŽπŸ½:

  • Stability: As a newer technology, Bun might have some stability concerns compared to the battle-tested Node.js. All Node versions except v22.0 have LTS (long-term support) release. This means that these versions of Node have been taken through several tests to ensure their performance and stability. Bun lacks this.

  • Miniature Ecosystem: Bun's ecosystem is still growing. You might not find solutions for every niche task compared to Node.js.

The GoodπŸ”₯:

  • Large Community: With a long history, Node.js has a massive user base and a wealth of online resources and support communities.

  • Fully-developed Ecosystem: Node.js has an established ecosystem of libraries, frameworks, and tools. You'll likely find pre-built solutions for almost any task you can imagine.

The BadπŸ‘ŽπŸ½:

  • Limited Native TypeScript Support: While TypeScript can be used with Node.js, it requires additional configuration and dependencies.

  • Managing dependencies and bundling code often requires additional tools like npm and webpack, which can add complexity.

Bun's Performance Edge 🦾

  • Bun leverages the Zig programming language for its core, resulting in significantly faster process startup compared to Node.js.

  • Bun utilizes the JavaScriptCore engine from WebKit, known for its efficiency. Benchmarks indicate Bun can outperform Node.js in raw JavaScript execution speed.

  • Bun integrates a package manager, bundler, and transpiler, eliminating the need for external dependencies like Webpack or Babel. This reduces complexity and improves build times.

  • Bun demonstrates faster file access and manipulation compared to Node.js. This can be beneficial for applications that handle large amounts of data or perform frequent disk operations.

When and Why to Choose Bun over Nodejs? πŸ€”

  • When your application demands top-notch performance:
    Because Zig (the programming language behind Bun) offers fine-grained control over code execution, creators of Bun can optimize the speed at a fundamental level.

  • You're working with TypeScript and appreciate native support:
    Bun offers built-in support for TypeScript, a superset of JavaScript that adds type safety. This means you can write type-safe code without needing additional configuration steps compared to Node.js, where TypeScript requires extra tools and configuration. This can lead to fewer errors and a more maintainable codebase.

  • When You Need a Built-In Database:
    SQLite is a widely used serverless, zero-configuration, self-contained SQL database engine. This makes it a great option for an internal database because it is embeddable. It eliminates the complexity of conventional databases is eliminated, allowing you to handle organized data.

Bun is a wonderful choice if you're developing a web application that needs an internal database and you want to minimize the number of external dependencies. Included with it is the bun:sqlite module, which is a high-performance SQLite3 driver implementation. Bun:sqlite promises three to six times greater performance than better-sqlite3, but its API was influenced by the latter.


Bun's emergence as a JavaScript runtime environment offers exciting possibilities for developers seeking top-notch performance and a smooth development experience. While Node.js remains a powerful choice with its established ecosystem, Bun's strengths in speed and developer experience make it a strong contender for the future of JavaScript development. As Bun continues to mature, it will be interesting to see how it shapes the landscape of JavaScript runtime environments.

Feel free to add contributions or drop questions in the comment box and until next time! Let's connect on Github and on Twitter

Top comments (0)