So you have this test that is already spitting out something big and complex to DOM and it's failing to find the expected element. You see the usual error message
TestingLibraryElementError: Unable to find an element with the text: ... and absolutely have no idea where things might have gone wrong. Inline errors are nice, however, you can't see the problem. 🙈
🍀 To solve this we will leverage snapshot testing! 🍀
Modify your test to get the
container out of render, then make a snapshot with
expect(container).toMatchSnapshot() 🪄. Notice, this trick can be applied regardless of the complexity of your test.
Re-run your test you'll see the snapshot file 🎉 (
App.test.tsx.snap), which is now totally under your control.
You can easily spot the problem and search your way through. It's pretty printed and already formatted as your IDE knows this stuff. Feel free to look around and close/open tags to see what is the actual DOM content at this point of the test.
Okay, we've found the problem, we missed some additional characters inside. Now we can fix our test. We can rerun and see it's all green 💚.
🚨 Also, make sure you remove the
*.snap file and the related
toMatchSnapshot line to avoid having unexpected snapshot tests later.
💡 This technique is especially useful when your component is rendering a huge markup (maybe a composite component already) and you can't find out why your test is not finding an element.
💡 Also useful to apply this technique if you just want to know the DOM state at a given step. If you are testing a loader with async data, you'll be able to make a snapshot before and after the async data have been loaded.
Let me know if you find this useful 😊
Hungry for more RTL tips 🍽️ ? See my previous post ➡️ Top 3 React Testing Library mistakes I should have spotted earlier 🚀
Latest comments (4)
This is terrible if you have junior developers in your team. "Oh, the test(s) didn't pass. I will just run them with
-u. All fixed."
Thanks for the constructive feedback 🙏.
This is how I am debugging bigger/complex components because I like to leverage my IDE's features like folding/syntax highlighting, etc. However one have to realise there at least 3 different methods for debugging.
Beside that I wrote the warning in red, if you try this out never forget to delete your snap files.
From here its the readers decision to try this out (or not) or
screen.debug()as mentioned below, which is also a very valid method.
Have a nice day!
you can just use
Yes, also pretty valid. I just don't like grepping in console output.