Jordan Finneran

Posted on Dec 23, 2020 • Edited on Mar 13, 2021 • Originally published at jordanfinners.dev

Creating a collapsible section with nothing but HTML

#webdev #javascript #html #beginners

Intro
Details
Examples
Summary

Intro

I love creating User Interfaces (UI) and often times well need a section to expand and collapse for example in a FAQ section.

I used to reach for NPM and install a library to help, until I discovered that you can do this with pure HTML elements!

They aren't perhaps the most obviously named:

They have pretty great browser support.

Details

The details element is the element to contain the content we want to show and hide.
The summary element is caption to describe what is hidden, in an FAQ section this might be the question and the answer is hidden in the details element until it is expanded.

You can toggle the details element open and closed with JavaScript if needed in your use case by setting the open attribute on it.

It is also pretty straightforward to style the arrow, you can see this in the example below where I've used an emoji instead but this can be anything you want.

Examples

Shut up and show me the code.

Summary

In summary, you can use what browsers give you to create an expanding and collapsing section.
It will be accessible for all users as its semantic HTML.
It will be super quick to load as there is only HTML and a few lines of CSS.
It will be responsive to any screen size.

Happy building!

What else would you like to see in this Web Dev series?

Top comments (20)

Madza • Dec 23 '20

proof that if you know the basic tech to the core, you don't always need frameworks, libraries, and all the other 'shiny' things 😉

Jordan Finneran • Dec 23 '20

There so much you can do with HTML and CSS!
There is also a place for shiny things but I'd always advocate using what the browser gives you for free first! :D

Madza • Dec 28 '20

Yeah, reminds me of these two articles 😉👍
HTML can do that?
CSS can do that

Felix • Jul 13 '23

Love this succinct article - very helpful and it shows that sometimes implementing elements in CSS and JS is overkill!

Ismael Benitez • Aug 22 '23

Thank you!

Rebecca • Sep 10 '23

Hey - this is a little bit of a "hail Mary" since this post is 3 years old, but I've tried everything I can think of to get this to work and so maybe I should just ask!

I love this code - it's so simple and functions just as I wanted it to. However, when I implemented it on my site and wrapped a <li> tag around the <span class="icon">, the rotate animation stopped working. I assume this is because the code is not looking for a li span.icon, it's looking for a span.icon that's nested directly within a summary tag only. However, I can't seem to edit the code to tell it to expect the li tag and rotate anyway. I've tried all kinds of variations to indicate parent, child, descendant relationships and it still refuses to rotate. I must be missing something obvious but I can't think what it is. Does that make sense? Do you know what the answer might be?

Thank you so much!

Jordan Finneran • Sep 23 '23

Hey, I wouldn't recommend nesting the span in a li tag. As ifs not really indicating a list item.
I would look at wrapping the content you want in the li tag.

If you did want to do that however you could change the following in CSS.
Anywhere you see summary span.icon change it to summary li>span.icon

The arrow indicates the span is a child of the li element 😊
Hope that helps

Fang Jin • Dec 23 '20

The tricky part of this piece is always the height of the invisible elements as well as the potential height when it's not visible.

Jordan Finneran • Dec 27 '20

Yes, the times I've used it so far, its normally in a group of a few collapsible sections so I've never had to worry about the height too much as I use CSS flex :)

Jordan Finneran • Dec 27 '20

What tricks are you having with height? Maybe its something we could work through :D

Gift Opia • Dec 23 '20

Wow this is actually very handy.... Reduces the call for bootstrap or other frameworks classes

Jordan Finneran • Dec 23 '20

Thank you, this means alot!
I'm going to cover off plenty more in this series! 😀

Manuel Sommerhalder • Dec 24 '20

be aware, the summary/details element is not as accessible as a well implemented accordion pattern.

Jordan Finneran • Dec 27 '20

Do you have any links or anything to read up on this? :)
Its semantic HTML elements, so I couldn't see much being better.

Manuel Sommerhalder • Dec 27 '20 • Edited

the first point is that it is not even a semantic HTML element for an accordion, it's much more a disclose widget (also mentioned here accessibleculture.org/articles/201...).

You can compare them at the WAI-ARIA practices site:
w3.org/TR/wai-aria-practices-1.1/#...
w3.org/TR/wai-aria-practices-1.1/#...

The article above also states some accessibility problems the screen readers have with details/summary element. I quote:

If you must have one or more links nested in the summary, arrange them so that they are not the first things within the summary element. And even if you manage this, you should recognise that:

- these links still won't be in any way clearly identifiable to users of VoiceOver in Safari;
- these links still won't be available to JAWS in FF or Window-Eyes in both FF and IE when these screen readers are in Browse Mode; and,
- JAWS users with IE will have a less than ideal experience reading the summary's content.

and another article:
scottohara.me/blog/2018/09/03/deta...

Jordan Finneran • Dec 27 '20

Thank you! Thats a really good note! :)

Adam Crockett 🌀 • Dec 23 '20

Hmm, I knew about this but I didn't think it had styling potential. If it's cross browser for evergreens then this is worth knowing for sure. Symantec and accessibility 🦾