loading...

Friday Blast #76

horia141 profile image Horia Coman Originally published at horia141.com on ・2 min read

Algebraic geometry (2019) - John Carlos Baez is a physics and maths blogger I’ve been following for some time. Most of the stuff he writes about is way above my pay grade, including algebraic geometry. However this article is about the psychology and sociology of science, and of how to approach difficult subjects, rather than maths per se. And I found it really interesting. And perhaps you will come back to these thoughts when approaching the next hard academic challenge you’re facing.

How to evolve an engineering organisation (2019) - some rules for building organisations for companies of different sizes. I’ve begun reading a big more about management lately. It’s a heterogeneous endeavor, but it’s nice that some parts of it have more formal aspects.

Headcount goals, feature factories, and when to hire those mythical 10x people (2019) - in the same vein of formalising a previously fuzzy domain, we look at hiring and setting the hiring bar in a company, given several constraints - project type, work overhead etc. The result - companies with smaller projects or high work overhead don’t need or can’t hire 10x engineers (excuse the simplification) jives well with reality.

Graceful shutdown (2019) - I’ve linked to work on structured concurrency several times in the past. It’s one of those things which will be big in 5 years time I think, like async/await is now. In this post the author looks at graceful shutdown of services and how to nicely model this in a structured concurrency framework. What I found interesting was the focus on making the graceful shutdown primitive “composable” - so you can use it alongside other primitives or language constructs.

Lessons learned scaling PostgreSQL database to 1.2bn records/month (2019) - there’s a lot of nice war stories here and a lot of pushing of Postgres. But I feel like the problem could be solved from the root. The author said they wanted a centralised database for all their data, and they wanted to push as much of the processing down to the database. This meant a lot of load on a single DB, a lot of mixed OLTP/OLAP workloads, denormalised views, scripts, ad-hoc message queues, crons etc. Which make sense for smaller DBs, but for huge ones these things break down. They’d have had much better luck going the MySQL/services approach of pushing such logic in separate systems, separate databases etc.

Posted on by:

horia141 profile

Horia Coman

@horia141

Leading the Bolt teams in Bucharest. We're working on cool products like food delivery, and interesting and challenging platforms like geo, A/B testing, user accounts and route tracking.

Discussion

markdown guide