I performed the same sysbench and redis benchmarks on
in the GCP region/zones europe-west-1d and europe-west-1b (Belgium).
I couldn't see any significant difference between the E2 and N1 machine types in any of the benchmarks.
Here are some results from the sysbench-cpu benchmark (total time in seconds):
sysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=50000 --num-threads=4 run | grep "total time:" e2-standard-4: 27.3814 ; 29.0544; 28.9985; 27.3325; 29.2564; 27.2810; 29.1408 n1-standard-4: 27.7668 ; 27.6391; 27.3915; 27.3113; 27.3933; 27.6044; 27.3655
The few CPU benchmark tests are showing some slightly better values for N1.
Please be aware that you might get other results. I tested only on two days in one region.
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I performed the same sysbench and redis benchmarks on
in the GCP region/zones europe-west-1d and europe-west-1b (Belgium).
I couldn't see any significant difference between the E2 and N1 machine types in any of the benchmarks.
Here are some results from the sysbench-cpu benchmark (total time in seconds):
sysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=50000 --num-threads=4 run | grep "total time:"e2-standard-4: 27.3814 ; 29.0544; 28.9985; 27.3325; 29.2564; 27.2810; 29.1408
n1-standard-4: 27.7668 ; 27.6391; 27.3915; 27.3113; 27.3933; 27.6044; 27.3655
The few CPU benchmark tests are showing some slightly better values for N1.
Please be aware that you might get other results. I tested only on two days in one region.