Is the Vyper Language any Good for Smart Contracts?
Over the last few years, Blockchain technology has become a primary focus for a great number of industries. Much of its allure is attributable to the underlying capability to create smart contracts — self-executing contracts with the terms of agreement directly written into lines of code. Ethereum has significantly popularized smart contracts and developers have started to adopt Solidity, a contract-oriented programming language for Ethereum Decentralized Applications (DApps).
However, a fairly new language on the block, Vyper, is rivaling Solidity on the grounds of safety and simplicity. So, the question that arises is: Is Vyper any good for smart contracts? Let’s find out!
Brief Introduction to Vyper
Vyper is a contract-oriented, pythonic programming language that targets the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). It has been developed with the specific goals of simplicity, security, and auditability in mind.
In other words, Vyper departs from Solidity’s feature-richness (some might argue complexity) to present a more streamlined and manageable alternative to developers. It avoids many of the troublesome constructs found in other languages, which reduces vulnerability and unintended consequences.
Security in Vyper
Arguably, the most important feature of Vyper is its security.
Vyper language offers stronger guarantees about the behavior and applications of the smart contracts. It intentionally restricts some of the more advanced features available in other languages to ensure security and auditability.
Vyper’s security-centric approach is reflected in its lack of decorators such as ‘public’ and ‘private’, which in other languages open doors for external contract tampering. Things are different with Vyper, which treats every function as public by default unless expressly defined as internal. This results in smart contracts that are harder to misuse.
Simplicity and Readability
In addition to being secure, Vyper also emphasizes simplicity and readability.
Unlike Solidity, which is very JavaScript-like and hence may be hard for beginners to learn, Vyper’s syntax closely resembles Python, a language heralded for its straightforward syntax and readability. This makes Vyper a lot easier for new developers to comprehend and utilize effectively.
The developers of Vyper have also resisted including features that can potentially introduce bugs. For instance, there’re no class hierarchies or function overloading, which, while being powerful tools, can lead to confusion and errors in development.
Auditability
Vyper favors simplicity not just for its ease of use but also for its auditability. The reason behind this is the concept of ‘strong typing’. Vyper’s statically-typed nature means that errors are caught early in the development string, hence, making auditing easier.
Developers are also unable to write to storage without declaring the state change, a feature that makes the code easier to read and lowers the risk of unforeseen side effects in a complex blockchain.
Drawbacks of Vyper
While its simplicity and security measures make it an attractive choice for smart contracts, Vyper does also have its downsides. It can be a tad too simplistic for some developers. The exclusion of certain programming constructs means that smart contracts written in Vyper might lack some of the flexibility and efficiency that could be achieved with Solidity.
Vyper is also not yet as commonly adopted as Solidity, meaning resources, community support, and real-world examples can be more difficult to find. However, its growing popularity suggests this may soon change.
Vyper vs. Solidity: The Verdict
In comparison with Solidity, Vyper may come up short in terms of feature-richness, but, in the realms of security and simplicity, it certainly shines. Its creators’ decision to restrict certain aspects in favor of simplicity and security makes it an appealing option for developers in search of these qualities.
Therefore, in determining whether Vyper is good for smart contracts, it largely hinges on the personal preferences and requirements of the developer. Do they prioritize security and simplicity over flexibility and efficiency?
Overall, Vyper seems to be a compelling language for developers to craft more secure, readable, and auditable smart contracts for DApps on the Ethereum blockchain.
References:
The post Decoding Vyper: The Future of Smart Contracts? appeared first on CryptoLoom.
Top comments (0)