The introduction of the ChatGPT has resulted in a deluge of AI-generated content on the internet. Distinguishing between human-written and AI-generated content has become increasingly challenging for organizations of all sizes. So, we thought it was time to reveal the truth about Hix Bypass vs. Easy AI Fixer.
While ChatGPT-4 and other sophisticated AI models have been useful, they still lack the necessary experience to produce high-quality material. Establishing a connection with the reader by the incorporation of feelings, experiences, emotions, and a personal touch is akin to creating content. These are the building blocks of good content, yet AI just can't seem to put them together.
The need for effective AI content detectors that can distinguish between human and AI writers was driven by the explosion in the number of these writers accessible online. With only a few keystrokes, these AI writers can crank out thousands of words of content. Nevertheless, publishers must be informed about the value they receive for their money.
During the initial round, our acid test list includes two AI content humanizers: Easy AI Fixer and Hix Bypass. We will compare the two techniques by applying humanization to the identical AI-generated example text and seeing which one works better.
Using five well-known AI content detectors, the second phase will compare the humanized text and determine the winner.
Section One: Using Sample Text to Humanize Text
Sample Text for Hix Bypass: Humanizing
We humanized the same AI-generated Sample Text using Hix Bypass to maintain the experiments' openness. On the other hand, the humanized text is displayed on the right side and may now be evaluated for AI scores using well-known AI detectors.
Sample Text for Easy AI Fixer: Humanizing
In order to run the tests with Easy AI Fixer (EAIF), the identical text sample was humanized. Unlike Hix Bypass, Easy AI Fixer can do double duty. If you use it to detect AI text, it will inform you what percentage of the text is generated by AI and give you the choice to make it sound more human. The left side displays the EAIF-humanized text, while the right side displays the Sample AI-generated text.
Section Two: Checking Humanized Sample Text
Copyleaks Scores for Hix Bypass
You may see the outcomes. The results demonstrated that the sample text was entirely generated by AI when we humanized it and ran it through one of the most renowned AI content detectors. Easy AI Fixer is up next.
Copyleaks Scores for Easy AI Fixer
Copyleaks verified that the outcomes of humanizing the identical sample text using Easy AI Fixer were commendable. After running the test, the Easy AI Fixer's humanized text looked natural.
GPTZero Scores for Hix Bypass
It is essential to run the tests through many AI content detectors in order to reach a valid and reliable conclusion. The sample text was tested by GPTZero after being humanized using Hix Bypass. The outcome reveals that the artificial intelligence percentage within the rendered text is 1%. Plus, it has a medium classification score. According to the Probability Breakdown, 31% of the material is human, while 69% is a combination of human and AI. In our test of Easy AI Fixer, we will examine these statistics to delve into the disparities.
GPTZero Scores for Easy AI Fixer
The results are presented below based on testing the same sample text with Easy AI Fixer applied to it. There is zero percent AI-generated text. Since the Confidence is High metric clearly indicates that the humanized text was authored by a human, Easy AI Fixer fared considerably better in the Classification. In the same vein, the Probability Breakdown section features 95% human content and 5% mixed content for the humanized text. Such high levels of certainty rendered the AI patterns meaningless and gave the writing a human touch.
Scribbr Scores for Hix Bypass
The majority of educational institutions have faith in Scribbr as a writing tool. This application is used by many students to examine and prepare their assignments. Thus, this AI detector had to be in our text list. One of the top AI checks revealed that 3% of the Hix Bypass humanized text was actually generated by AI. The proportion is smaller. Nevertheless, there remains room for development.
Scribbr Scores for Easy AI Fixer
When comparing the outcomes of AI-generated text with Easy AI Fixer, the score is satisfactory. A perfect score to personalize your material would be an AI-generated score of zero. Once again, Easy AI Fixer demonstrated its worth as a top AI content fixer in the Scribbr test.
Content at Scale Scores for Hix Bypass
When this AI detector was used to analyze Hix Bypass's humanized text, the results for Content at Scale were difficult to discern. When it comes to Passes as Human, Hard to Tell, and AI Content Detected, Content at Scale has you covered. The majority of the text is highlighted as being generated by artificial intelligence, and it stands at the crossroads for Hix Bypass.
Content at Scale Scores for Easy AI Fixer
To our delight, Easy AI Fixer replicated its previous success in passing the Content at Scale AI Detector test. The example text that was made to look more human with Easy AI Fixer does a good job. The fact that no text was identified as being generated by artificial intelligence increases the likelihood that the material is entirely penned by a human.
Conclusion
We tested the identical sample text with the same word count to ensure transparency. According to the results for four of the top AI content detectors on the internet, Easy AI Fixer was better than Hix Bypass.
See for yourself why Easy AI Fixer is the most cost-effective AI content humanizer by giving it a go. On top of that, it serves as an AI content checker and successfully humanizes the AI-generated.
Easy AI Fixer does a decent job comparing the free trials. Before you buy a tool, make sure you can use it to your satisfaction. We were given 10,000 free words from EAIF to use for AI content identification and 1,000 free words to make the writing more human. In contrast, Hix Bypass's price tag is high, and the free trial is severely restricted, allowing users to only write 300 words per month.
Top comments (0)