Not sure what you mean. Indeed 100% code coverage is not achievable for many real world apps. A more reasonable target for code with a lot of UI is 60-80%. But this is only because (in my view) we don't have the toolset to do 100%. 60%-80% code coverage means that 40%-20% is tested manually which in turn means not very often or not at all.
Not sure what you mean. Indeed 100% code coverage is not achievable for many real world apps. A more reasonable target for code with a lot of UI is 60-80%. But this is only because (in my view) we don't have the toolset to do 100%. 60%-80% code coverage means that 40%-20% is tested manually which in turn means not very often or not at all.
We are on the same page, I agree.