“What we can agree on is 100% code coverage is the gold standard” I don’t trust 100% code code coverage on a business application. This project I have no issue with the concept but in the wild that’s almost a red flag to me.
Not sure what you mean. Indeed 100% code coverage is not achievable for many real world apps. A more reasonable target for code with a lot of UI is 60-80%. But this is only because (in my view) we don't have the toolset to do 100%. 60%-80% code coverage means that 40%-20% is tested manually which in turn means not very often or not at all.
“What we can agree on is 100% code coverage is the gold standard” I don’t trust 100% code code coverage on a business application. This project I have no issue with the concept but in the wild that’s almost a red flag to me.
Not sure what you mean. Indeed 100% code coverage is not achievable for many real world apps. A more reasonable target for code with a lot of UI is 60-80%. But this is only because (in my view) we don't have the toolset to do 100%. 60%-80% code coverage means that 40%-20% is tested manually which in turn means not very often or not at all.
We are on the same page, I agree.