1 - Good catch mate. I have updated the article.
2 - Yeah, you are correct. My intention was to tell the reader to make everything async than parallelise. Updated it accordingly :)
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Hello! I think there's 2 minor bugs:
Result
is a property, not a method. So you should be using.Result
to access the value, not.Result()
.2.
I think "parallelise" isn't the best word to be used here, since you've already stated above that "Tasks do not guarantee parallel execution" :P
Thanks for the feedback indeed.
1 - Good catch mate. I have updated the article.
2 - Yeah, you are correct. My intention was to tell the reader to make everything
async
than parallelise. Updated it accordingly :)