front end? reactJS? blazor? What to choose

Blazor WebAssembly: Bridging the Gap Between Web and .NET
Blazor WebAssembly is a game-changer for web development, allowing developers to build interactive web applications using C# and .NET. Here’s why it’s one of the best features in .NET 8:

1. Full-Stack C# Development for the Web
Blazor WebAssembly enables full-stack development using C# for both client-side and server-side code.
With Blazor, you can write your web application entirely in C# without relying on JavaScript or other front-end frameworks.
This seamless integration between client and server simplifies development and reduces context switching for developers.

2. WebAssembly Power
Blazor leverages WebAssembly (Wasm), a binary instruction format that runs directly in web browsers.
WebAssembly allows high-performance execution of code, making Blazor apps fast and efficient.
The compiled C# code runs directly in the browser, providing a native-like experience for users.

3. Component-Based Architecture
Blazor follows a component-based architecture, similar to popular front-end frameworks like React and Angular.
You create reusable components with their own logic, rendering, and event handling.
Components can be easily composed to build complex UIs, promoting code reusability and maintainability.

4. Razor Syntax
Blazor uses Razor syntax, which is familiar to ASP.NET developers.
Razor allows you to mix C# code with HTML seamlessly, making it easy to create dynamic web pages.
Intellisense support in Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code enhances productivity.

5. Rich Ecosystem and Libraries
Blazor benefits from the existing .NET ecosystem, including libraries, NuGet packages, and tools.
You can use popular libraries like Entity Framework, SignalR, and more within your Blazor app.
This integration accelerates development and ensures compatibility with other .NET projects.

6. Progressive Web Apps (PWAs)
Blazor WebAssembly supports building Progressive Web Apps (PWAs).
PWAs provide an app-like experience in the browser, including offline capabilities, push notifications, and installation on users’ devices.
With Blazor, you can create PWAs using familiar .NET tools and techniques.

7. Debugging and Tooling
Blazor WebAssembly benefits from robust debugging and tooling.
You can set breakpoints, inspect variables, and debug your C# code directly in the browser.
Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code offer excellent support for Blazor development.

Conclusion
Blazor WebAssembly brings the power of .NET to the web, allowing developers to build rich, interactive applications using C# and WebAssembly. Whether you’re creating a simple website or a complex enterprise app, Blazor is a feature that truly shines in .NET 8.

I also did some analysis on statistics regarding the popularity of Blazor and React:

Blazor:
Blazor is a relatively new framework that allows developers to build web applications using C# and .NET.
As of now, Blazor has gained traction and is rapidly growing in popularity.
It currently has around 28,000 stars on GitHub.
React:
React, on the other hand, has been around for quite some time and has a well-established community.
It remains one of the most loved JavaScript libraries, with over 188,000 stars on GitHub1.
However, recent statistics indicate that React’s dominance is being challenged.

Usage Statistics:
According to a survey conducted in 2023, Node.js overtook React.js to become the most used web framework among software developers worldwide.
Around 42.7% of respondents reported using Node.js, while 40.6% were using React.js.
Although React still holds a larger market share and community, Blazor is catching up and gaining popularity.

References

1. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1124699/worldwide-developer-survey-most-used-frameworks-web/
2. https://blog.logrocket.com/blazor-vs-react-minimize-javascript/

In summary, React has been a dominant player for a long time, but Blazor’s emergence as a full-stack C# web framework is noteworthy. Developers now have a viable alternative to React, and the choice between the two depends on specific project requirements and personal preferences