DEV Community

Cover image for Writing Async Tests for Vert.x using Kotlin
Selim Dincer
Selim Dincer

Posted on

Writing Async Tests for Vert.x using Kotlin

Testing asynchronous code can be a challenging task. Usually some tooling is required to make it work with testing frameworks like junit.

For Vert.x projects, there's an official junit module to help writing these tests.
The VertxTestContext in that module is comparable to a standard CountdownLatch. The testing framework waits for the latch to unlock and a callback does the unlocking.

Unfortunately this leads to a quite a bit of boilerplate code for simple unit tests. Luckily though, Kotlin's coroutines provide a clean solution to write tests in a more traditional-looking way.

In this article, we're going to explore how this can be achieved by migrating a simple example to use Kotlin's coroutines.

Here's a slightly modified version of the first test:

@Test
@Timeout(value = 5, timeUnit = TimeUnit.SECONDS)
void service_is_healthy(Vertx vertx, VertxTestContext testContext) {
  HttpClient httpClient = vertx.createHttpClient();

  httpClient.request(HttpMethod.GET, 8080, "localhost", "/health")
    .compose(HttpClientRequest::send)
    .compose(HttpClientResponse::body)
    .onComplete(testContext.succeeding(buffer -> {
      JsonObject responseJson = buffer.toJsonObject();

      Assertions.assertEquals("up", responseJson.getString("status"));
      testContext.completeNow();
    }));
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now, what are the problems with this code? Notice how the the test context clutters the test code. Wouldn't it be nicer if we didn't have to worry about it?

Let's rewrite this using Kotlin coroutines:

@Test
@Timeout(5, unit = TimeUnit.SECONDS)
fun `service is healthy`(vertx: Vertx): Unit = runBlocking(vertx.dispatcher()) {
  val httpClient = vertx.createHttpClient()

  val request = httpClient.request(HttpMethod.GET, 8080, "localhost", "/health").await()
  val response = request.send().await()
  val responseJson = response.body().await().toJsonObject()

  Assertions.assertEquals("up", responseJson.getString("status"))
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

As you can see, we got rid of almost everything that's unrelated to the actual test. This is the main benefit of using coroutines for tests with Vert.x.

Let's go over the changes that we introduced here. First, we wrapped the test body in runBlocking in order to be able to start coroutines inside the test.

Note: It's important that the coroutines run on the Vert.x threads. Luckily, Vert.x provides a #dispatcher function that we can use for runBlocking.

The #await calls make sure that exceptions make the tests fail. They also force junit to wait for our test, esentially making the VertxTestContext obsolete for our tests.

On top of that, we avoid callbacks and nesting. This makes our tests a little more readable.

Summary

In this short article, we saw that Kotlin's coroutines can vastly reduce the noise in asynchronous tests. Instead of fighting with the asynchronous nature of our code, we can focus on the tests themselves. In the next part, we will see how we can add some helpers to make writing tests even easier.

Source

A full project can be found in this GitHub repo.

Top comments (2)

Collapse
 
gonne profile image
gonne

Nice article, but I assume the java equivalent should look like this:

@ExtendWith(VertxExtension.class)
public class JavaHttpServerTest {
  @Test
  @io.vertx.junit5.Timeout(value = 5, timeUnit = TimeUnit.SECONDS)
  void start_http_server(Vertx vertx, VertxTestContext testContext) {
    vertx.createHttpServer()
      .requestHandler(req -> req.response().end())
      .listen(16969)
      .onComplete(testContext.succeedingThenComplete());
  }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
Collapse
 
wowselim profile image
Selim Dincer

Yep, you are correct. I took the code from this example and made it use the injected VertxTestContext: vertx.io/docs/vertx-junit5/java/#_...
I'll try to update the post with a more fitting example πŸ˜‰