The current specification for the JavaScript Math object (namespace), according to MDN, comprises of 8 properties and 35 methods.

The extensive range of methods include a variety of Logarithmic Trigonometric and utility functions. Yet there is, at least in my eyes, a glaringly obvious omission.

There is `min`

and `max`

that can both take numerous arguments and return a single value, but where is the `sum`

function?

Instead we have to resort to coding this function ourselves, which is far from efficient.

Examples include:

```
function sum(...nums) {
return nums.reduce((tot, num) => tot + num);
}
// or
const sum = (...nums) => nums.reduce((tot, num) => tot + num);
```

We could polyfill but extending standard objects like Math is seldom a good decision.

I really would like to know why this method is missing, any suggestions?

## Oldest comments (5)

Maybe because one can create one-liner for it, as you have demonstrated ðŸ¤”

You could also create a one-liner (now we have arrow functions, rest operators and reduce methods) for min, max, etc. but having it implemented inside the JS engine will always be faster.

Does your sentence mean that implementing arbitrary functions in code source is never fast as implemented in programming language, in this case EcmaScript (JavaScript engine) ?

Having the function built into the language will most often run faster than using the language to implement the function. If this were not the case the role of WebAssembly would be rather questionable.

The closer "to the metal" the function implementation the more performant it is likely to be. JavaScript is about as far from the metal as you can get (on the same box) so is less likely to be more performant than the same function implemented in other languages.

Also consider, the functions I gave above can be called with Numbers, BigInts, Strings and even Arrays (not necessarily with desirable results).

Thanks for an answer !