Just noticed that the entity 'Zones' has an attribute 'ActID', which shouldn't be there if I am correct. A one-to-many relationship should only have a foreign key on the 'many'-side, as having one on the other side does not make sense. Having 'BossID' there would make more sense ;-).
Nice article!
Just noticed that the entity 'Zones' has an attribute 'ActID', which shouldn't be there if I am correct. A one-to-many relationship should only have a foreign key on the 'many'-side, as having one on the other side does not make sense. Having 'BossID' there would make more sense ;-).
Nice catch, now edited :)