DEV Community

Discussion on: How do you feel about regex?

Collapse
thumbone profile image
Bernd Wechner

Indeed. The very point. That REs shine for small ad hoc jobs. Grammars and parsers are from a different context altogether. To epitomise the role of REs consider a job I example that simply wants detect all lines that contain one word somewhere before the other. This is trivially simple in an RE and preciously whence their definition stems (as in I can write that on the command line for a grep or find) and the niche in which their ubiquity reigns. That small need right now for a mildly complex pattern test or field extraction.

Thread Thread
citizen428 profile image
Michael Kohl

Yes, I think we fully agree here, my original response was maybe not clear enough. For the things regex were made for, there's IMO no better solution. But I've also seen too many people implement what effectively become super brittle parsers with them, which is also not the right thing to do.

The main reason I mentioned Raku is that Larry Wall deserves a lot of the credit for modern regex implementations, after all they generally try to be Perl compatible. So it's interesting to see which shortcomings he perceived (Raku regexes are quite different from PCRE) and also that he decided that there is a space for grammars on the language level.