DEV Community

Funda
Funda

Posted on • Edited on

Git Branching, Step-by-Step

git

"Stop.
Collaborate and Listen." ~ V. Ice
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode



It is highly recommended that you install some kind of decorator for your shell (bash or zsh.) It will help you always know what branch you're in, and it's easier on the eyes. Many use iTerm. I install oh-my-zsh with curl: Visit zsh

STEP 1

If you have collaborator permissions for the shared repo, do this:

In your terminal, type:

git status

As often as you want to. It will give you clues about your next steps in any type of git workflow. git status, early and often.

STEP 2

I make sure I am in the master branch of my team's shared repository & that I have the LATEST VERSION:

git checkout master

git pull origin master

STEP 3

I make my very own branch. You can make one from the Github site (or Bitbucket or Azure DevOps Repos) but I prefer to do it in Terminal/bash. I name it a name with no spaces, like: "mybranchname". It's best to name it after a feature or fix you're working on.

git checkout -b myNEWbranchname

Now I am in my branch, not the master, so it is safe to make changes.

STEP 4

I code away in my code editor, tappity-tap.

STEP 5

I add my changes:

git add path/to/file-name-here *

*hint: find the paths to names of changed files by running git status

or as a shortcut, to add all files:

git add .

STEP 6

Then I commit the changes:

git commit -m 'my awesome improvements to our app'

STEP 7

If I only want to push changes to the local copy of my branch (see step 8 below, for how you connect it the first time)

git push

STEP 8

First time pushing to the branch? I want the changes to be saved locally on my machine but I also want the remote reference to my branch to reflect them too, so commits are being tracked every time.

This is a common error - branches can get out of sync. Remember git versioning is in your machine but what matters most is the shared repo that lives on another server. The remote branch and the local branch need to reflect each other at all times.

git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/mybranchname mybranchname

STEP 9

If you ran git status you would know now to:

git push

STEP 10: Collaborate

But hold up. I think someone was working on a feature just now. I don't think I had the latest master code after all. I want to resolve conflicts with the master branch ahead of time, before I make a Pull Request.

So I:

git pull origin master - yes from right inside my branch!

This will both fetch my parent branch (in this case master, but it could be some other parent development branch, too) and merge it with my current branch! Remember to fix any merge conflicts now.

STEP 11

If you ran git status again, you would know to:

git push to push the merged changes to your local branch.

If I get a prompt that I need a commit message to explain the merge, I can exit the editor with

Shift Z Z

STEP 12

I go to my remote repository github.com (ot Bitbucket or Azure DevOps Repos)

Once there, I see "Pull Requests", so I click to go to that page.

STEP 13

I click on my pull request to open it up, and then I click the confirmation (or Approval) button, and click again, until I have satisfied all of the options to confirm the merge*. If there are conflicts, I resolve them before confirming everything and/or completing the merge.

*if you are deploying pipelines with automations connected to your PR (pull request) there may be more steps. That is outside the scope of this document.

STEP 14

You will be asked to delete the branch. This is a best practice, though many people avoid it. Use your discretion. If you keep your branch make sure you are always up-to-date with master before beginning any new work. It's a best-practice to use new, descriptively named branches for bugfixes and features, then delete them after merging.

STEP 15

In my terminal (or git bash,) I bring the remote master code (and all references to commit histories and other branches) into my local branch & push again. My local branch should always be in sync with what's happening in the remote repo. From inside my branch:

git pull origin master
git push (to my branch)

STEP 16

If I had deleted my branch on the site after the PR, in my terminal, I delete the local version of the branch.

git branch -d mybranchname

STEP 17

I want to make a new branch and start this cycle all over again from STEP 1.

Rinse. Repeat.

Top comments (27)

Collapse
 
ben profile image
Ben Halpern

Nice post Funda.

For STEP 4, I'd also suggest git add -p as a means of deciding which files to include. It lets you step through all your changes and give a y or n to decide what to stage.

Collapse
 
thadevelyouknow profile image
Funda

I love that. I am trying to be absolutely minimal (MVP) here, since this was written for the classroom & there is always a lot of confusion when students first encounter this. Perhaps I will add links to handle more shortcuts, best practices, and features.

Collapse
 
ben profile image
Ben Halpern

👌

Collapse
 
rolgalan profile image
Roldán Galán

This is a nice article, however steps 9 and 10 should be swapped.

First you pull the updated master and then you remove the feature branch. Otherwise you will need to force branch delete (git branch -D) because your local repo doesn't know yet that the branch is already merged. And forcing is not nice ;).

Cheers!

Collapse
 
thadevelyouknow profile image
Funda • Edited

yes this is right --- I will edit! And you are correct that forcing anything isn't nice at all.
Thank you for the improvement!

Collapse
 
jpgoldberg profile image
Jeffrey Goldberg

Should there be a git merge master between steps 6 and 7? I try to resolve conflicts, if any, before I submit the PR.

Collapse
 
marioestradarosa profile image
Mario Estrada • Edited

Jeffrey,

Your question is valid 100%. after git checkout mybranchname we should perform a git merge master. It is at this stage that conflicts may appear and you have a chance to fix them. This way you make sure your branch won't conflict with the remote master branch.

Even more, when several developers are working release updates constantly to the master branch, we advise them to perform this sync process often to see how your changes operates in the whole application.

Collapse
 
thadevelyouknow profile image
Funda

the merge happens on the website not from the terminal. This is for students to be able to visualize it in the GUI.

Collapse
 
jrock2004 profile image
John Costanzo

So are you saying that git pull origin master is not required? Why would I pull master locally then just push my branch up?

Thread Thread
 
thadevelyouknow profile image
Funda

git pull origin master is being executed again at step 5. when you push to your branch it creates the pull request on the github website.

Collapse
 
thadevelyouknow profile image
Funda

Updated with changes!

Collapse
 
_shahroznawaz profile image
Shahroz Nawaz

Hey Funda nice effort you've put in the article. I've also written an article on Manage Branches and Resolve Conflicts. Your Feedback would be welcome :)

cloudways.com/blog/manage-branches...

Collapse
 
chiangs profile image
Stephen Chiang

Hi Funda,

Shouldn't one pull from the master after committing changes to your branch so that you are up to date and can resolve and merge conflicts before doing the PR?

Collapse
 
thadevelyouknow profile image
Funda

you mean switch to master, 'git checkout master', then switch back to branch and 'git push origin branch'? Yes...this is what I do, but I found with students too much switching caused confusion. It's either extra switching or extra merge conflicts.

Collapse
 
chiangs profile image
Stephen Chiang • Edited

Maybe I'm confused, but I thought that if others have been working on their own branch and in the process of working on mine, a few PRs have been merged...so before I push to my remote and initiate a PR, I should git pull from the current master to my branch?

Kind of like this:

$ git add .
$ git commit -m "comments"
$ git pull origin master
$ git push origin myBranchName

Then open a PR.

Thread Thread
 
sergiopicciau profile image
Sergio Picciau

You can so you will eventually get conflicts on your feature branch and solve them before pushing to remote.

Thread Thread
 
thadevelyouknow profile image
Funda

that's in the steps now, edited ;-)

Thread Thread
 
chiangs profile image
Stephen Chiang

I see that in Step 5 you switch back to master to pull to your local copy of master, but how does that update your local branch without pulling master to your local branch?

I guess I still don't really understand why you would switch back to master and then back to branch. Thanks!

Thread Thread
 
leahein profile image
Leah Einhorn

Valid question. Just doing git pull origin master in Step 5 will NOT update your local branch. This tutorial is missing a step between 6 and 7. Essentially after you git pull origin master in Step 5, and git checkout mybranchname in step 6, you will run git merge master to combine the master branch changes into your feature branch, named mybranchname. Hope that helps!

Collapse
 
idanarye profile image
Idan Arye

You skipped a step between 4 and 5 - you forgot to create the pull request.

Collapse
 
thadevelyouknow profile image
Funda • Edited

It’s implied in the ‘keep clicking green buttons’ part after you go to the Github site. I have edited this now to assume reader has collaborator permissions. You are right that if this were an open source project, the user would have to create a pull request. But these steps are for students who are just learning to become team collaborators, and for them, the pull request is created when you push origin mybranchname in terminal. Thank you!

Collapse
 
chiangs profile image
Stephen Chiang

I really like using the following to flip back and forth between the two most recent branches. Saves time and having to remember some complicated branch name!

git checkout -
Collapse
 
itachiuchiha profile image
Itachi Uchiha

Thanks, Funda. This is a nice post. Some developer who started to git as a beginner should read this post. I'll share.

Collapse
 
thinkhuang profile image
Third_Thinker

I love this post with that style,especially the beginning of group pictures! HaHa