DEV Community

Cover image for Tutorial: What is a good directory structure for a monorepo with a Node.js back end and React front end?
Simon Plenderleith
Simon Plenderleith

Posted on • Originally published at simonplend.com on

Tutorial: What is a good directory structure for a monorepo with a Node.js back end and React front end?

Do you want to keep your Node.js back end and React front end in the same git repository, but aren’t really sure how to structure it? Perhaps you’ve heard about monorepos as a solution to this, but you aren’t really sure where to start. It’s often decisions like these which feel like they should be simple, but quickly turn into a confusing problem!

Setting up your project repository as a monorepo typically requires learning how to use a tool like Yarn or Lerna, as well as managing multiple package.json files with different dependencies. It’s also going to require a bunch more configuration if you want to use a continuous integration service with your monorepo, and you’ll also need to think about even more configuration to get everything deployed. The good news is that for most projects you probably don’t need to set them up as a monorepo, as there’s a much simpler way to organise your front end and back end code in the same repository, while still keeping the code cleanly separated.

Let’s dive straight in with an example directory and file structure for a project with a Node.js back end and a React front end. It might look like this:

├── src
│ │
│   ├── client <- Front end code
│   │   ├── components
│   │   │   └── ExampleComponent.js
│   │   └── index.js <- The main entrypoint for your front end React application
│ │
│   └── server <- Back end code
│   └── app.js <- The main entrypoint for your Node.js back end server
│
├── package.json <- Specifies front end and back end dependencies
├── package-lock.json
├── README.md
└── webpack.config.js <- Configuration for compiling front end assets
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In most cases it is simpler to have a single package.json in the root of your repository which defines the dependencies for both your front end and back end. The front end and back end code is neatly organised into separate directories, and the standard npm install command will be able to install the dependencies for both. This is a lot simpler than having to learn, add and configure a tool to your project just to perform basic development tasks. It will also be compatible with pretty much any continuous integration or deployment service that you might choose to use.

Here is an example package.json which specifies all the dependencies which the front end and back end require, as well as some npm scripts that help with building the front end assets and running the Node.js back end server:

{
  "name": "example-app",
  "scripts": {
    "build": "webpack --mode development --entry ./src/client/index.js --output ./static/bundle.js",
    "start": "node src/server/app.js"
  },
  "dependencies": {
    "express": "^4.17.1"
  },
  "devDependencies": {
    "@sucrase/webpack-loader": "^2.0.0",
    "react": "^16.13.1",
    "react-dom": "^16.13.1",
    "sucrase": "^3.15.0",
    "webpack": "^4.43.0",
    "webpack-cli": "^3.3.12"
  }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

You might have noticed that the dependencies for the React front end are specified under devDependencies. This is because after the front end assets (normally CSS and JavaScript) have been built they are not needed for deployment, and most sensible deployment systems will remove any installed devDependencies to reduce the size of what they’re deploying.

The dependencies for the Node.js back end are specified under dependencies as they need to be deployed for the Node.js server to be able to run.

To help you understand how this structure can work for your React and Node.js project I’ve created an example project on GitHub which you can clone and explore.

The nice thing about this approach is that you’re not locked in to any extra tooling. If you do find that your project becomes more complex in future, and you decide that you do need to organise it as a monorepo, there’s nothing about this simplified structure which will get in the way of you changing things around.

Do you want to learn more about developing with Node.js?

Sign up to my newsletter and I’ll let you know whenever I publish a new blog post.

I’ll never spam you or sell your information, and you can use the unsubscribe link in the e-mails I send to opt out at any time.

Top comments (0)