10x engineer idea was based on bad science. It was purely subjective impression. The people surveyed claimed that some of their devs seemed to have 10x more output. There was no scientific definition of what that meant. It's rubbish we should forget about.
Please edit your article to reference the the basis for this discussion. That would be very helpful for people reading it. Otherwise, nice commentary article.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
10x engineer idea was based on bad science. It was purely subjective impression. The people surveyed claimed that some of their devs seemed to have 10x more output. There was no scientific definition of what that meant. It's rubbish we should forget about.
Yeah I found that paper later after I published the article
Please edit your article to reference the the basis for this discussion. That would be very helpful for people reading it. Otherwise, nice commentary article.