Those who are actually dedicated to the sciences often have a lot of respect for the arts and humanities, in my experience.
Here's something most people don't know: "liberal arts" actually encompasses non-applied sciences like math and physics. Even computer science is at its core a liberal arts field which is why the Department of Computer Science at my alma mater, Pitt, had been administered under the same school as the departments of linguistics and history.
The term "liberal arts" comes from the Middle Ages when serfdom and slavery still existed, and the Latin-derived word "arts" was roughly equivalent to the Germanic "skill." These "arts" – originally arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, music theory, grammar, logic, and rhetoric – were seen in the Roman era as essential to participating in civic life as a free (i.e. liberated) person. In the Medieval era, they were understood as "liberating" man from peasantry. That connotation of "socioeconomic uplift" has of course continued into the present-day.
The funny thing is that there are parallels between the anti-intellectualism of today and the beginnings of the "Dark Ages." Something that a lot of people misunderstand is that the Dark Ages weren't really imposed by barbarian invasions. In fact, these trends had started within the Roman, and later Western Roman and Byzantine, Empire as a result of the Church denouncing liberal education (in the classical sense) as heresy. The Dark Ages were a choice, not an imposition.
The point of my history lesson is that liberal arts and non-STEM work and education form the foundation of all we do in the modern world. These disciplines underpin STEM fields and guide them. They aren't somehow discrete and separate. If we reject and devalue them, we risk falling into the same spiral of ignorance; this time an ignorance of democracy, liberty, justice, our history, things we take for granted.
One of the mainstays of the modern tech industry is open source software. Open source has its philosophical underpinnings in the free software movement which applied enlightenment political philosophies and futures studies to the world of computers. Early proponents of open-source (including Tim O'Reilly, the author of the article I linked to on anti-intellectualism) saw its power in enabling innovation and applied it to software outside of the realm of GNU and similar projects.
Proprietary software has its place to be sure, but some use-cases just don't make practical sense. Take electronic medical records, for example. One of the worst aspects of modern EMR systems is the lack of interoperability which causes untold amounts of headache for doctors and hospitals and can result in serious physician errors. It also results in software lock-in which removes competition, the main pricing mechanism of a market system, and drives up the costs of the healthcare.
All of this came about because an applied science was examined through a lens of sociology, economics, and political science. Not to mention, linguistics and logic underpin computer science and led to the development of the programming languages we know and love today.
The arts and humanities are valuable tools to direct the implementation of technology. Even if you eschew and ridicule them, they still underpin your worldview and your craft.