You’re right, (++) is not an efficient operation for a single-linked-list, and so one could make a (good, in my oppinion) argument for it’s removal.
Thing is, Haskell’s List also has (++), and Elm hasn’t had a stable Array implementation (it gets one in 0.19).
List
Array
If my proposal is accepted, it would make sense to remove bad operations from List.
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
You’re right, (++) is not an efficient operation for a single-linked-list, and so one could make a (good, in my oppinion) argument for it’s removal.
Thing is, Haskell’s
List
also has (++), and Elm hasn’t had a stableArray
implementation (it gets one in 0.19).If my proposal is accepted, it would make sense to remove bad operations from
List
.