Ruben

Posted on Mar 19, 2019 • Edited on Dec 1, 2020

5 reasons to go with CSS in JS for your next application

#javascript #css #discuss

CSS is awesome, and it’s easy to get started with.

But front-end applications have been scaling at a massive, and complex rate that I don’t believe the current CSS architecture is designed for the job.

I still believe that the current CSS architecture has a place in this crazy world for small sites, and even small applications.

I’m going to list a set of problems that I’ve come across with CSS over the 9 years of developing for the web.

And I believe CSS in JS solves these problems.

I will be demonstrating how CSS in JS solves these issues by using 2 libraries Styled Components and React.

CSS problem #1: Global namespace

I created a style sheet that contains CSS code for a container element.

The container style will increase in size if it also contains the class name home.

Now I have created the home page HTML, imported the stylesheet, and have added the class names to the HTML elements.

But wait, I need an about page! Let’s create that now.

I’ve now created the about HTML page, imported the style sheet, and created a new container element.

Great, right?

Not exactly. The style sheet that I imported contains styles from the home page.

And there is nothing to stop me from using class names that was designed for the home page.

Over time this simple site will grow to have thousands of lines of CSS, and HTML code.

And CSS rules that have been defined in the past will be re-used across the site. The problem lies when a engineer attempts to change a class rule.

It has a very high potential of breaking or changing other parts of the site that were not meant to be modified.

CSS in JS allows us to keep styles encapsulated to a React element.

I’ve created 2 components here.

The first component is named, Title.

Title is responsible only for styling., The second component is Greet.

Greet is responsible using the styled component that I created and displaying the greet message to the user.

Title been defined as a local style. No other React component or HTML element will be able to access these styles. Safe!

CSS problem #2: Implicit dependencies

This is called style of writing SASS/CSS is called BEM. Ever heard of it?

Probably not.

BEM is one of many CSS methodologies. And the objective with a CSS methodology is to reduce the lack of built-in scoping mechanism.

OOCSS is a method to separate containers and content with CSS “objects”.

We also have:

SMACSS
SUITCSS
Atomic

Nonetheless, each of these solutions are just a quick patch solution.

CSS problem #3: Dead code elimination

Why download CSS code that isn’t going to be used?

CSS in JS can dynamically clean up CSS code that is not being used.

CSS problem #4: Minification

CSS out of the box doesn’t have a feature to minify code.

For big applications unminified CSS code can get fairly big, especially with crazy amount of white space (indentation) we add to the stylesheet.

To minify CSS code you’ll have to use a third party service online or setup dev task to minify your code.

Which just creates another dependency your CSS.

CSS problem #5: Sharing constants

CSS supports a sharing constants with their built-in function called var().

But it does not support IE. And it barely supports Edge 15.

We can say, “Microsoft stop support of these browsers.”

But according to W3Schools, which they get 50 million visits per month.

They say 4% comes from IE and Edge.

That’s a total of 2 million users using IE and Edge. Not really numbers that we can ignore.

And with a recent project with Verizon Media, the application needed to support IE 9 still.

So var(), goes right out the door. For the moment.

Another con is that CSS variables cannot be accessed on the server side either.

Let’s take the React example above and modify it a bit to see how we can use constants across our application.

I created a new file named constants.js, and inside that file it contains a value for the primary text color, FireBrick.

I than updated the Greet component to use the new constant I created.

First I imported the new constant into the Greet.js file. Then I use a technique called interpolation inside the Title component.

The hard-coded color value was swapped for the constant.

While I’m at it, I’ll create a new component called Button, and it will use the same constant.

The only difference is that primaryTextColor is now being used in 2 css properties for the Button component.

The components will stay consistent now.

CSS in JS benefits

Besides solving those 5 issues above, it comes with some additional benefits.

Generates minimum CSS requires
Good runtime performance
Supports dynamic styling
Easy to pre-render important CSS

Conclusion

At the end of the day we’re not getting rid of CSS. We’re just adding JavaScript to enhance CSS.

The old CSS architecture is perfectly fine for small sites, and small applications.

But it may not be appropriate choice for medium to big size applications in 2019.

Sure, we can add SASS, methodologies, and even CSS modules into the mix, but again, those are small patches that require strict rules, and tooling.

Those are not solutions for the future.

I would say that CSS in JS is not the ultimate solution, but it’s the best one we have so far.

Let me know your thoughts and comments on Twitter.

Top comments (12)

Anton Korzunov • Mar 20 '19

1. CSS problem #1: Global namespace

And there is nothing to stop me from using class names that was designed for the home page.

CSSModules or BEM, as just a "more safe way to name things" could save the day. But CSSModules would be enough.

Is there anything, that CSS-in-js could improve? No.

2. CSS problem #2: Implicit dependencies

BEM, SMACSS, SUITCSS, Atomic, Nonetheless, each of these solutions are just a quick patch solution.

In short - you are wrong. This is not quick patch solutions, and BEM/Atomic approach(even if there is no similarity between then) could be used with "CSS-in-JS". You just don't get the point - they are about "structuring" the rules, not writing/naming them

Is there anything, that CSS-in-js could improve? No. The problem is perpendicular.

3. CSS problem #3: Dead code elimination

CSS in JS can dynamically clean up CSS code that is not being used.

How? Probably you might just delete it?
What if you have a one style file per component? - You probably might just delete it. Or not import it if you didn't use component.

Is there anything, that CSS-in-js could improve? No. It's the same.

4. CSS problem #4: Minification

For big applications unminified CSS code can get fairly big, especially with crazy amount of white space (indentation) we add to the stylesheet. Which just creates another dependency your CSS.

Miniwhatthing? How you think CSS-in-JS "minifies" their code? It does NOT do it. Instead of it you have to download some(a huge amount) of JS to parse, prefix and apply your styles in runtime.

CSS-in-JS usually consumes more space.

Is there anything, that CSS-in-js could improve? No. They even much worse.

5. CSS problem #5: Sharing constants

CSS supports a sharing constants with their built-in function called var().

constants are supported by SASS or LESS. Supported perfectly, and you can build bridges between JS and CSS using webpack loaders.
The problem is with variables, which you might not need.

Is there anything, that CSS-in-js could improve? Yes. The only thing CSS-in-JS can rule.

Total

Generates minimum CSS requires? NO.
Good runtime performance? RUNTIME? CSS does not require any runtime, and vanilla CSS parsers are much faster than js parsers. Keep CSS as CSS if you need "speed".
Supports dynamic styling? Yes, but do you need it really?
Easy to pre-render important CSS? And inline it into HTML? What are you doing?

Zero-runtime

If you like "CSS-in-JS" - use "zero-runtime" CSS-in-JS libraries. They produce CSS, while being "JS" for you

Styled-Components? All the reasons you listed - are falsy. Believe the old pirate.

Ruben • Mar 20 '19

Those are nice libraries that I've never seen until now. I'll have to do a deep dive on them.

Overall, I don't believe traditional CSS architecture belongs in a 2019 (mid to big size) application.

We're moving towards a componentize architecture and traditional CSS structure doesn't work because of the problems I've mentioned above.

With that said, CSS modules I have heard of and I think it's great but it adds more dependencies to an application and more knowledge about Webpack configuration that an engineer needs to know.

I don't think there is a good enough reason to why need to add all that complexity or even know it.

Writing CSS in a JS file does solve the problems above, and you honestly don't need a library to do so. You can inject it inline.

Now you might say, INLINE CODE IS THE WORST!

It was horrible before because you had to write it manually, but now you can just have a style object and inject into the style attribute. You may also move the style object to it's own file for "separation of concerns".

You're still writing CSS, but just doing it through JavaScript.

Anton Korzunov • Mar 20 '19

We're moving towards a componentize architecture and traditional CSS structure doesn't work because of the problems I've mentioned above.

Probably the problem is with traditional CSS structure.

With that said, CSS modules I have heard of and I think it's great but it adds more dependencies to an application and more knowledge about Webpack configuration that an engineer needs to know.

It's one line. And even CRA supports it. So - there is no complexity.

Writing CSS in a JS file does solve the problems above

The problems are solved by a specialized library, not CSS-in-JS as technology itself

you honestly don't need a library to do so. You can inject it inline. Now you might say, INLINE CODE IS THE WORST!

I would say - INLINE CODE IS THE WORST!!! You got me :P

There is one, a single one reason not to use inline css - meta selectors.

Meta selectors give you the ability to:

target :hover, :focused, :active states, which you still could emulate with a pure js, but better dont
target different medias, which enables responsive and fluid designs. You still can use window.matchMedia, and produce the right styles for a current media, but it's not quite maintainable (and SSR/cache friendly)
use pseudo selectors, like :before or :after, which could simplify your html and make code cleaner. It's still possible to just add mode nodes to the markup, and joggling everything with javascript. But there are situations, when you have to use all features listed above simultaneously, like add :after element for :hover state on some @media, and CSS code shall be preferred.

And every time, when you are writing MORE CSS code than JS code, and that could be a thing, if you really use all possibilities of CSS - you might prefer CSS-in-CSS, not in JS.

It seems to me - you are underusing CSS features. And, actually, shall not have any issues in this case - CSS problems are problems of a scale.

Bohdan Kostrytskyi • Mar 21 '19

Agree. CSS module system is the best

import styles from './App.module.scss';

which can be use after as

<div className={styles.App}> ... </div>

mkenzo_8 • Mar 20 '19

var() is actually very useful when you only have to focus on one browser, in this case Chrome. When will that happen? ElectronJS.

ElectronJS uses chromium so it supports the lastest CSS features as var() and you can actually build apps on it.

Ruben • Mar 20 '19

That’s true. Most modern browsers support var().

I currently have the misfortune of working on applications that need to support IE 9

Bohdan Kostrytskyi • Mar 21 '19

The main issue with CSS in JS libs like Styled Component in that it reloads the whole app on every change. While CSS module system works perfect atm for me.

Vladislav Guleaev • Feb 1 '20

I would never put my css into components so they grow as hell. Why should i do it?
Also zero linting and intelesence. Who invented this and why?

Ruben • Feb 1 '20

You don't get linting or intellisense in traditional CSS anyways, so... By the way, why not? If it works it works...

Matthias • Feb 10 '20 • Edited

Well IntelliJ Idea checks your csss.

.myClass {
  display: blocks; <-- error is shown
}

whereas

<style jsx>{`
  .myClass {
    display: blocks; <-- no error shown (cause it is just a 'string')
  }
`}</style

Petr Kučera • Mar 20 '19

And what about CSP?
Does it inclide nonce?
Or must be unsafe-inline enabled?

Ruben • Mar 20 '19

This might help

Resource link

View full discussion (12 comments)

DEV Community

5 reasons to go with CSS in JS for your next application

CSS problem #1: Global namespace

CSS problem #2: Implicit dependencies

CSS problem #3: Dead code elimination

CSS problem #4: Minification

CSS problem #5: Sharing constants

CSS in JS benefits

Conclusion

Top comments (12)

1. CSS problem #1: Global namespace

2. CSS problem #2: Implicit dependencies

3. CSS problem #3: Dead code elimination

4. CSS problem #4: Minification

5. CSS problem #5: Sharing constants

Total

Zero-runtime

Read next

Your coding year in review

How to Uncheck All Your Twitter (X) Interests in Bulk with Developer Tools (Quick Method)

Dirty Code: Simple Rules to Avoid It

Angular vs Next.js: A Detailed Comparison