If you are managing multiple React applications and want consistency across your user interfaces, sooner or later you'll find that you need a component library.
When I first wanted to create a React component library, it took me a lot of time to find a setup that met all my requirements and wasn't too complicated.
A guide like this would've spared me a great amount of energy wrestling with this stuff myself. I hope it can help you as much as it would have helped me.
This post covers setting up and publishing a React component library, including configuring your build process and publishing your package to npm so you and/or others can use it.
I've done my best to keep all configurations simple and concise, using default settings whenever possible.
When you are done, you can install your library like any other npm package:
npm install @username/my-component-library
And use it like:
import { Button } from `@username/my-component-library`;
function MyComponent() {
return <Button>Click me!</Button>
}
Before we start
Before we dig into the implementation details, I would like to elaborate on some technical details regarding the setup of the library.
🌳Fully tree shakeable
For me it was particularly important that only necessary code ends up in the final application. When you import a component, it only includes the necessary JS and CSS styles. Pretty cool, right?
🦑Compiled CSS modules
The components are styled with CSS modules. When building the library, these styles will get transformed to normal CSS style sheets. This means that the consuming application will not even be required to support CSS modules.
As a bonus compiling the CSS modules avoids a compatibility issue and the package can be consumed in both, environments that support named imports for CSS modules, and environments that don't.
(In the future I want to extend this tutorial to use vanilla-extract instead.)
😎TypeScript
While the library is written in TypeScript, it can be consumed in any "normal" JavaScript project as well. If you never used TypeScript before, give it a try. It not only forces you to write cleaner code, but also helps your AI coding assistant make better suggestions 😉
OK enough reading, now let's have some fun!
1. Setup a new Vite project
If you have never worked with Vite, think of it as a replacement for Create React App. Just a few commands and you are ready to go.
npm create vite@latest
? Project name: › my-component-library
? Select a framework: › React
? Select a variant: › TypeScript
cd my-component-library
npm i
That's it, your new Vite/React project is ready to go.
Here are two things I recommend you to do right after installing Vite.
2. Basic build setup
You can now run npm run dev
and browse to the url provided by Vite. While working on your library, this is a place where you can easily import your library and actually see your components. Think of all code inside the src
folder as your demo page.
The actual library code will reside in another folder. Let's create this folder and name it lib
. You could also name it differently, but lib
is a solid choice.
The main entry point of your library will be a file named main.ts
inside of lib
. When installing the library you can import everything that is exported from this file.
📂my-component-library
+┣ 📂lib
+┃ ┗ 📜main.ts
┣ 📂public
┣ 📂src
…
Vite Library Mode
At this time, if you build the project with npm run build
Vite will transpile the code inside src
to the dist
folder. This is default Vite behavior.
For now you will use the demo page for development purposes only. So there is no need to transpile this part of the project yet. Instead you want to transpile and ship the code inside of lib
.
This is where Vite's Library Mode comes into play. It was designed specifically for building/transpiling libraries. To activate this mode, simply specify your library entry point in vite.config.ts.
Like so:
import { defineConfig } from 'vite'
+ import { resolve } from 'path'
import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react'
export default defineConfig({
plugins: [react()],
+ build: {
+ lib: {
+ entry: resolve(__dirname, 'lib/main.ts'),
+ formats: ['es']
+ }
}
})
💡 The default formats are
'es'
and'umd'
. For your component library 'es' is all you need. This also removes the necessity for adding thename
property.💡 If your Typescript linter complains about
'path'
and__dirname
just install the types for node:npm i @types/node -D
Typescript and library mode
The tsconfig.json
created by Vite only includes the folder src
. To enable Typescript for your newly created lib
folder as well you just need to add it to the Typescript configuration file like this:
- "include": ["src"],
+ "include": ["src", "lib"],
Later you will import components directly from the dist
folder to test your library on the demo page. And because typescript will spill an error if you import a component that has not yet been built, you need to be exclude the src
folder when building the library.
One way to do this is to create a separate configuration file for building and extend tsconfig.json
:
📂my-component-library
┣ …
┣ 📜tsconfig.json
+┣ 📜tsconfig-build.json
…
The only difference between the default configuration and the build configuration is that for building you only have lib
included instead of lib
and src
.
📜tsconfig-build.json
{
"extends": "./tsconfig.json",
"include": ["lib"]
}
To use tsconfig-build.json
for building you need to pass the configuration file to tsc
in the build script in your package.json:
"scripts": {
…
- "build": "tsc && vite build",
+ "build": "tsc --p ./tsconfig-build.json && vite build",
Finally you will also need to copy the file vite-env.d.ts
from src
to lib
. Without this file Typescript will miss some types definitions provided by Vite when building (because we don't include src
anymore).
You can now execute npm run build
once more and this is what you will see in your dist folder:
📂dist
┣ 📜my-component-library.js
┗ 📜vite.svg
💡 The name of the output file is identical with the
name
property in your package.json per default. This can be changed in the Vite config (build.lib.fileName
) but we will do something else about this later.
The file vite.svg
is in your dist
folder because Vite copies all files from the public
directory to the output folder. Let's disable this behavior:
build: {
+ copyPublicDir: false,
…
}
You can read a more detailed explanation here: Why is the file vite.svg in the dist folder?
Building the types
As this is a Typescript library you also want to ship type definitions with your package. Fortunately there is a Vite plugin that does exactly this: vite-plugin-dts
npm i vite-plugin-dts -D
Per default dts
will generate types for both src
and lib
because both folders are included in the project's .tsconfig
. This is why we need to pass one configuration parameter: include: ['lib']
.
// vite.config.ts
+import dts from 'vite-plugin-dts'
…
plugins: [
react(),
+ dts({ include: ['lib'] })
],
…
💡 It would also work to
exclude: ['src']
or use a different Typescript config file for building.
To test things out, let's add some actual code to your library. Open lib/main.ts
and export something, for example:
lib/main.ts
export function helloAnything(thing: string): string {
return `Hello ${thing}!`
}
Then run npm run build
to transpile your code. If the content of your dist
folder looks like below you should be all set 🥳:
📂dist
┣ 📜main.d.ts
┗ 📜my-component-library.js
💡 Don't be shy, open the files and see what the program did for you!
3. What is a React component library without components?
We didn't do all of this just to export a helloAnything
function. So let's add some meat 🍖 (or tofu 🌱 or both) to our library.
Let's go with three very common basic components: A button, a label, and a text input.
📂my-component-library
┣ 📂lib
+┃ ┣ 📂components
+┃ ┃ ┣ 📂Button
+┃ ┃ ┃ ┗ 📜index.tsx
+┃ ┃ ┣ 📂Input
+┃ ┃ ┃ ┗ 📜index.tsx
+┃ ┃ ┗ 📂Label
+┃ ┃ ┗ 📜index.tsx
┃ ┗ 📜main.ts
…
And a very basic implementation for these components:
// lib/components/Button/index.tsx
export function Button(props: React.ButtonHTMLAttributes<HTMLButtonElement>) {
return <button {...props} />
}
// lib/components/Input/index.tsx
export function Input(props: React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement>) {
return <input {...props} />
}
// lib/components/Label/index.tsx
export function Label(props: React.LabelHTMLAttributes<HTMLLabelElement>) {
return <label {...props} />
}
Finally export the components from the library's main file:
// lib/main.ts
export { Button } from './components/Button'
export { Input } from './components/Input'
export { Label } from './components/Label'
If you npm run build
again you will notice that the transpiled file my-component-library.js
now has 78kb 😮
The implementation of the components above contains React JSX code and therefore react
(and react/jsx-runtime
) gets bundled as well.
As this library will be used in projects that have React installed anyways, you can externalize this dependencies to remove the code from bundle:
//vite.config.ts
build: {
…
+ rollupOptions: {
+ external: ['react', 'react/jsx-runtime'],
+ }
}
4. Add some styles
As mentioned in the beginning, this library will use CSS modules to style the components.
CSS modules are supported by Vite per default. All you have to do is to create CSS files that end with .module.css
.
📂my-component-library
┣ 📂lib
┃ ┣ 📂components
┃ ┃ ┣ 📂Button
┃ ┃ ┃ ┣ 📜index.tsx
+ ┃ ┃ ┃ ┗ 📜styles.module.css
┃ ┃ ┣ 📂Input
┃ ┃ ┃ ┣ 📜index.tsx
+ ┃ ┃ ┃ ┗ 📜styles.module.css
┃ ┃ ┗ 📂Label
┃ ┃ ┣ 📜index.tsx
+ ┃ ┃ ┗ 📜styles.module.css
┃ ┗ 📜main.ts
…
And add some basic CSS classes:
/* lib/components/Button/styles.module.css */
.button {
padding: 1rem;
}
/* lib/components/Input/styles.module.css */
.input {
padding: 1rem;
}
/* lib/components/Label/styles.module.css */
.label {
font-weight: bold;
}
And import/use them inside your components eg:
import styles from './styles.module.css'
export function Button(props: React.ButtonHTMLAttributes<HTMLButtonElement>) {
const { className, ...restProps } = props
return <button className={`${className} ${styles.button}`} {...restProps} />
}
⛴️ Ship your style
After transpiling your library you will notice that there is a new file in your distribution folder:
📂dist
┣ …
┣ 📜my-component-library.js
+ ┗ 📜style.css
But there are two issues with this file:
- You need to manually import the file in the consuming application.
- It is one file that contains all styles for all components.
Import the CSS
CSS files just can't easily be imported in JavaScript. Therefore, the CSS file is generated separately, allowing the library user to decide how to handle the file.
But what if we were to assume that the application using the library has a bundler configuration that can handle CSS imports?
For this to work, the transpiled JavaScript bundle must contain an import statement for the CSS file. We are going to use yet another Vite plugin (vite-plugin-lib-inject-css) that does exactly what we need with zero configuration.
npm i vite-plugin-lib-inject-css -D
// vite.config.ts
+import { libInjectCss } from 'vite-plugin-lib-inject-css'
…
plugins: [
react(),
+ libInjectCss(),
dts({ include: ['lib'] })
],
…
Build the library and take a look at the top of your bundled JavaScript file (dist/my-component-library.js
):
// dist/my-component-library.js
import "./main.css";
…
💡 You may notice that the CSS filename has changed from style.css to main.css. This change occurs because the plugin generates a separate CSS file for each chunk, and in this case the name of the chunk comes from the filename of the entry file.
Split up the CSS
But there's still the second problem: when you import something from your library, main.css
is also imported and all the CSS styles end up in your application bundle. Even if you only import the button.
The libInjectCSS
plugin generates a separate CSS file for each chunk and includes an import statement at the beginning of each chunk's output file.
So if you split up the JavaScript code, you end up having separate CSS files that only get imported when the according JavaScript files are imported.
One way of doing this would be to turn every file into an Rollup entry point. And, it couldn't be better, there is a recommended way of doing this right in the Rollup documentation:
📘 If you want to convert a set of files to another format while maintaining the file structure and export signatures, the recommended way—instead of using output.preserveModules that may tree-shake exports as well as emit virtual files created by plugins—is to turn every file into an entry point.
So let's add this to your configuration.
First install glob
as it will be required:
npm i glob -D
Then change your Vite config to this:
// vite.config.ts
-import { resolve } from 'path'
+import { extname, relative, resolve } from 'path'
+import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url'
+import { glob } from 'glob'
…
rollupOptions: {
external: ['react', 'react/jsx-runtime'],
+ input: Object.fromEntries(
+ glob.sync('lib/**/*.{ts,tsx}').map(file => [
+ // The name of the entry point
+ // lib/nested/foo.ts becomes nested/foo
+ relative(
+ 'lib',
+ file.slice(0, file.length - extname(file).length)
+ ),
+ // The absolute path to the entry file
+ // lib/nested/foo.ts becomes /project/lib/nested/foo.ts
+ fileURLToPath(new URL(file, import.meta.url))
+ ])
+ )
}
…
💡 The glob library helps you to specify a set of filenames. In this case it selects all files ending with
.ts
or.tsx
Glob Wikipedia
Now you end up with a bunch of JavaScript and CSS files in the root of your dist
folder. It works, but it doesn't look particularly pretty, does it?
// vite.config.ts
rollupOptions: {
…
+ output: {
+ assetFileNames: 'assets/[name][extname]',
+ entryFileNames: '[name].js',
+ }
}
…
Transpile the library again and all JavaScript files should now be in the same organized folder structure you have created in lib
alongside with their type definitions. And the CSS files are inside a new folder called assets.
Transpile the library again and all JavaScript files should now be in the same organized folder structure that you created in lib
along with their types. And the CSS files are in a new folder called "assets". 🙌
Notice that the name of the main file has changed from "my-component-library.js" to "main.js". That's great!
4. A few last steps before you can publish the package
Your build setup is now ready, there are just a few things to consider before releasing your package.
The package.json
file will get published along with your package files. And you need to make sure it contains all important information about the package.
Main file
Every npm package has a primary entry point, per default this file is index.js
in the root of the package.
Your library's primary entry point is now located at dist/main.js
, so this needs to be set in your package.json
. The same applies to the type's entry point: dist/main.d.ts
// package.json
{
"name": "my-component-library",
"private": true,
"version": "0.0.0",
"type": "module",
+ "main": "dist/main.js",
+ "types": "dist/main.d.ts",
…
Define the files to publish
You should also define which files should be packed into your distributed package.
// package.json
…
"main": "dist/main.js",
"types": "dist/main.d.ts",
+ "files": [
+ "dist"
+ ],
…
💡 Certain files like
package.json
orREADME
are always included, regardless of settings: Read the docs
Dependencies
Now take a look at your dependencies
: right now there should be only two react
and react-dom
and a couple of devDependencies
.
You can move those two to the devDepedencies
as well. And additionally add them as peerDependencies
so the consuming application is aware that it must have React installed to use this package.
// package.json
- "dependencies": {
+ "peerDependencies": {
"react": "^18.2.0",
"react-dom": "^18.2.0"
},
"devDependencies": {
+ "react": "^18.2.0",
+ "react-dom": "^18.2.0",
…
}
💡 See this StackOverflow answer to learn more about the different types of dependencies: Link
Side effects
To prevent the CSS files from being accidentally removed by the consumer's tree-shaking efforts, you should also specify the generated CSS as side effects:
// package.json
+ "sideEffects": [
+ "**/*.css"
+ ],
Ensure that the package is built
You can use the special lifecycle script prepublishOnly
to guarantee that your changes are always built before the package is published:
// package.json
"scripts": {
"dev": "vite",
"build": "tsc && vite build",
…
+ "prepublishOnly": "npm run build"
},
5. Demo page and deployment
To just play around with your components on the demo page, you can simply import the components directly from the root of your project. This works because your package.json
points to the transpiled main file dist/main.ts
.
src/App.tsx
…
import { Button, Label, Input } from '../';
…
To publish your package, you just need to run npm publish
. If you want to release your package to the public, you have to set private: false
in your package.json
.
You can read more about publishing your package, including installing it in a local project (without publishing) in this article of mine: Publish/install your package
FAQs
Can I remove the CSS imports from the output?
Yes, you can easily remove the vite-plugin-lib-inject-css
plugin (and subsequential the sideEffects
from your package.json
)
Having done that you will get one compiled stylesheet containing all required classes in dist/assets/style.css
. Import/use this stylesheet in your application and you should be good to go.
You will of course loose the CSS treeshaking feature which is made possible by importing only the required CSS inside each component.
I published a branch demonstrating this change here: https://github.com/receter/my-component-library/tree/no-css-injection
Does this work with Next.js?
Importing CSS from external npm packages works since Next.js 13.4:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/27953#discussioncomment-5831478
If you use an older version of Next.js you can install next-transpile-modules
Here is a Next.js demo repo: https://github.com/receter/my-nextjs-component-library-consumer
How to use Storybook for my library?
To install Storybook run npx storybook@latest init
and start adding your stories.
To be able to build Storybook you need to disable the libInjectCss
plugin. Otherwise you will run into an TypeError: Cannot convert undefined or null to object
error when running npm run build-storybook
This plugin is not needed to build Storybook so you can remove it from the config when building Storybook.
Add this to .storybook/main.ts
:
+ import { withoutVitePlugins } from "@storybook/builder-vite";
const config: StorybookConfig = {
…
+ viteFinal: async (config) => {
+ return {
+ ...config,
+ plugins: await withoutVitePlugins(config.plugins, [
+ "vite:lib-inject-css",
+ ]),
+ };
+ },
};
If you add stories inside the lib
folder you also need to make sure to exclude all .stories.tsx
files from the glob pattern so the stories don't end up in your bundle.
glob.sync('lib/**/*.{ts,tsx}', { ignore: 'lib/**/*.stories.tsx'})
Thanks @codalf for figuring that out!
I published a branch with Storybook set up here:
https://github.com/receter/my-component-library/tree/storybook
Thanks for reading!
If you did not follow along or something wasn't that clear, you can find the full source code with working examples on my GitHub Profile:
- https://github.com/receter/my-component-library
- https://github.com/receter/my-component-library-consumer
- https://www.npmjs.com/package/@receter/my-component-library
Fingers crossed you found it helpful, and I'm all ears for any thoughts you'd like to share.
Top comments (54)
Please note that this will not work with Next.js. You cannot provide CSS import in JS for SSR.
This is the issue you will face: nextjs.org/docs/messages/css-npm
For Next.js the solution would be to import the CSS on Next's side so that it can be loaded in an appropriate location. So you would need to make boilerplate file for every entry in a Next app so that the CSS would be only loaded when the component is going to be used to get the benefit of only loading what is needed.
Hi Vesa,
this is very interesting, thank you! I did not yet try to use this approach within a Next.js project.
You can also remove the inject-css plugin (and the
sideEffects
from thepackage.json
)Having done that you should be able to just import the generated css file (
dist/assets/style.css
) inside your Next.js project. But of course you will not have the css treeshaking advantages with this approach.I published a branch with this approach here: github.com/receter/my-component-li...
Generally there are answers for the quetions raised in the linked issue:
As Global CSS.
The order of the individual files is determined by the order they are imported inside the libraries main file.
And the order in the consuming application should not matter.Maybe it would be possible to write a Next.js plugin enabling this.
What do you think?
You are incorrect about the order in consuming application not mattering. Because people tend to write overrides. Or they may use things from multiple sources and mix their use together. And then loading order, or order of the styles as they exist in the document, does matter.
For an example, in my past experience Styled Components was notorious for becoming a true troublemaker with style issues. Because if you had multiple different components from different libraries + your own local Styled Components + SC was primarily designed for the React SPA world, but we entered the "SSR is a better idea" era, and then you would just end up having awfully hard to debug style issues. CJS to ESM transition also caused it's own share of issues.
And Styled Components is all about style injection. I think they've now got it somewhat in order with their v6 release, but we're of course on our way away from Styled Components as runtime CSS-in-JS is fundamentally bad for performance.
Then there are even issues with CSS Modules in Vite. Vite does not keep the modules on their own but instead mashes
composes
into the consuming output file. So this means the same class name definition can be loaded again later, and if you do any property overrides then BOOM now you have issues that flicker depending on which order the CSS is loaded. So you just have to know not to ever write property overrides when using CSS Modules.Anyway, I think doing any sort of
import './style.css'
orinjectStyles
will always be fundamentally wrong. You must be able to control the loading order of the CSS and the only thing that can reliably do that is the consuming app / framework.Yes you are absolutely right about overrides. If you assign classes to the exported components it makes a difference if these classes come before or after the classes provided by the component library.
In this case the component library styles have to be imported before to have a lower specificity. And this is only guaranteed if the library is imported before any other styles.
As you correctly mention, the consuming application is responsible for ensuring the correct order of css.
You should be able to ensure this if:
Do you have more info like a github issue on this?
Can you ellaborate on this?
I guess the issue answers the latter question: github.com/vitejs/vite/issues/7504
Thanks for the link!
The reason I am working on this topic and wrote the article is that I am trying to find the best solution to build a component library. I don't like CSS in JS that much and I am convinced that a stylesheet based approach is the way I want to go. I will think about the style ordering and might publish another article on this soon.
I wrote you on LinkedIn, if you are interested in having a discussion about this topic I would be more then happy to speak/write to you.
The advantage of handling the style imports inside the library is (obviously) that you don't need to manually import styles. This is not a big issue if it is just one stylesheet for a library. But if you only want to import the styles for components you actually use I see no other really satisfying solution.
I do have some rough ideas though…
Yeah, the more you want to provide benefits to the user (= well splitting code, tree shaking, only styles you need) the nastier the management comes for the component library consumer.
We are in transition to CSS Modules based component library at work and the design of that is basically a bunch of
createXYZ()
functions with the sole role of passing in the CSS Modules as loaded by the consuming app. It could be a little better by instead just creating the components and making them use a hook that would provide the styles from context, and then have a context provider. Although I guess then you'd end up with the issue that all the CSS would be loaded at once.One reason for doing things like that is we also use some of the very same CSS Modules directly. It does provide benefits as you can choose to work without a component just using the styles to classes, use composes to extend in a local module, get unified breakpoints for both CSS and JS, or use the convenient components when you don't need that much power (although our main layout component and text component are both very versatile).
The problem I have is that only our team really needs the full intelligent splitting. Other teams work on what are more like in-house SPAs, so for them there is a friction in moving from Styled Components to CSS Modules. They don't like the boilerplate and they don't need to consider app boot times. So this is one reason I found your article.
I have the feeling that a fundamental problem is that the order of CSS is defined by the order it is imported in javascript. Which is kind of by chance because sometimes a component is imported earlier and sometimes later.
There are also not so easy to fix problems with dynamic importing github.com/vitejs/vite/issues/3924
I created a branch with a very simple example that demonstrates the order issue if anyone is interested in an example: github.com/receter/my-component-li...
What I did not expect: When importing ANY component from the library, all other imported CSS, even for components imported later on, will be at the same position.
Looks like it works since Next.js 13.4:
github.com/vercel/next.js/discussi...
github.com/vercel/next.js/discussi...
I just created a new nextjs project and it seems to work quite fine.
Here is the my repo: github.com/receter/my-nextjs-compo...
What version of nextjs were you using? I would like to reproduce.
Also can you try if this works for you:
In
next.config.js
:Hi, Vesa,
I'm not having this problem with Next. The doc you provided says that this issue occurs when the source files are consumed instead of the build files. Are there other circumstances that produce this problem that we should watch out for?
My steps, in a monorepo with NPM workspaces:
packages
).apps
).page.tsx
. This file doesn't contain the 'use client' directive, so I believe it's SSR.Results:
Question:
Are there cases in which we would consume the build files and still encounter this issue?
dev.to/receter/comment/2ag7m
I added a faq section about using Storybook: dev.to/receter/how-to-create-a-rea...
I don't have experience of having a library as a part of a monorepo setup, but I would guess it will be handled more like a part of the local project, not as an external dependency.
The problem exists when you release the built library as a npm package and then try to import it, so it will be within
node_modules
.The guide discusses essential technical details, such as TypeScript integration, CSS modules, tree shaking, and peer dependencies. It covers these aspects while keeping the content concise and understandable.
Great article really helpfull! 🥳
Keep up the awesome work 💪!
But my .stories files gets included in the bundle.
I tried to exluded them by extending the glob.sync:
glob.sync('stories/**/*{!(*.stories).ts,!(*.stories).tsx,!(*.stories).js,!(*.stories).jsx}')
But it did not work.. 🤔
Any idea why this is happening?
Thx!
Edit:
Fixed it, I was stupid and included the * in the begining:
glob.sync('stories/**/{!(*.stories).ts,!(*.stories).tsx,!(*.stories).js,!(*.stories).jsx}')
But it still includes the stories.d.ts... 😞
Edit 2:
Sorry I'm asking to fast 😅, working glob that exclude stories files:
'stories/**/{!(*.stories|*.stories.d).ts,!(*.stories).tsx,!(*.stories).js,!(*.stories).jsx}'
Edit 3:
I initially thought it worked. But stories.d.ts still included.. :/
I was successful with this:
glob.sync('lib/**/*.{ts,tsx}', { ignore: 'lib/**/*.stories.tsx'})
Thx man!
That worked great 🤩!
I have added a FAQ section about using Storybook: dev.to/receter/how-to-create-a-rea...
Hi Js4,
why do you have your stories in the library? I think it would be better to place them outside the
lib
folder. Then you shouldn't have to exclude them.Really great tutorial! Thanks!
I'd like to add StoryBook to the component library. Is this straight-forward or is there anything special I have to consider?
I used
npx storybook@latest init
to install Storybook, which seemed to work fine. I can start Storybook in dev mode withnpm run storybook
, howevernpm run build-storybook fails with an error:
`=> Failed to build the preview
TypeError: Cannot convert undefined or null to object
at Function.values (<anonymous>)
at configResolved (file:///C:/prj/react/cp-web-react-components/node_modules/vite-plugin-dts/dist/index.mjs:582:100)
I looks like it has to do with the modified vite setup...
Hi Peter,
The issue comes from using the plugin
libInjectCss
with Storybook. You should not need this plugin to build Storybook. You can remove it from the config when building Storybook.Add this to
.storybook/main.ts
add this:Hi Andreas,
that did it! Thanks a lot!
This is really a nice setup for our company component library!
Here is the branch with Storybook: github.com/receter/my-component-li...
Hi Peter, thanks for your comment. I will try to find some time over the weekend and create a branch with storybook.
So 3 questions.
Hi Bica,
Thanks for you comment!
copyDtsFiles
and all your d.ts files will get copied to the output.I also noticed that for each d.ts file an empty d.js file is created. This is not wanted and you can fix it by changing the glob to
lib/**/!(*.d).{ts,tsx}
:Here is a branch that uses global types: github.com/receter/my-component-li...
You need to export all components that you want to expose to the outside. If you have a component that is only used internally you don't have to include it in
main.ts
.But not all components will end up in you final application bundle, only the components that you import will.
To use SASS you need to first install it
And then you can just rename files to for example
styles.module.sass
and everything should compile fine.If you need a global stylesheet you can create a
lib/global.sass
and import it inmain.ts
:Here is a branch that uses global sass for the Button and a global stylesheet: github.com/receter/my-component-li...
Does this answer your questions sufficiently?
I had noticed my index.d.ts becoming converted to index.d.js and being empty.
On the export question, our setup differs a bit from the standard react component folder structure....i.e how I'm doing it is basically..
So in main.ts I guess I have to do
Yes? I get an error if I don't specify as default because I don't have my components as index.tsx files.
Then we are using Bootstrap. They haven't updated their sass to support @use and @forward, they still use @import so I have to be careful when pulling it in due to increased file size and duplication. What I was doing was running the sass command on build so a css was compiling and added to dist so the end developer could pull it in if they chose (from a theme perspective). However I want to play around with your solution inside the main.ts
Per the above I have to be careful adding a sass import to the top of individual components because if an input is used multiple times per page, I fear the reference to the styles will be repeated....I am not sure if that is valid in react. But if that file has to reference our bootstrap sass for their utility methods (i.e. color or fontsize) I think it will try to pull in bootstrap again due to the import issue I mentioned.
I want to have a playground locally to test the package but I don't want my local testing to be a part of our commit, just the package library.
For exporting your components you should be able to:
But inside of toggleWhatever.tsx you need to have a named export like:
If you for some reason need to export the components as default you can also do it like this which is easier to read in my opinion:
Not 100% sure what you mean with the SASS, but if you import a button multiple times the styles will be included just once.
CSS duplication issues can also be handled downstream by your bundler.
If you use a global CSS library you should be fine by just adding an import in
main.tsx
In this case the CSS library will end up in your application as soon as one component of the library is used. You could also add an import for the library to every component that needs the library, so the CSS library is only bundled if one of these components is imported.Yes it does! I'll check out your fixes and if they will work with my changes.
Thank you very much for this tutorial. I am using this to build a production app in my workplace, The issue I am going through is something like this.
Think that a button components is using types which are coming from icon component also.
So in the button component there will be a import like
import iconProps from "../icons/types"
but after building the project all the t.ds files are in root level but still the button.js build file has a import import iconProps from "../icons/types" which is not resolving since there is no icon folder inside the dist folder now. Seems like even I managed to add all the d.ts files in root level the js files using them are not resolving the path properly.
I am using multiple entry points for dts plugin as well.
So I managed to add d.ts files of some components on the relevant folder without ading them to root, which is not the ideal way I guess
Hi Lanka,
Thanks, glad you like the article. Could you create a repo with a minimal example to reproduce this? Can you ellaborate on why you need this config for dts? Why don't you exclude the story files in the rollup config?
And here is a branch on how I would recommend to setup storybook: github.com/receter/my-component-li...
Andreas, thank you for sharing such a well thought out and detailed explanation of how to set up a component library. This subject isn't easy, but you did a great job explaining everything. I took inspiration from your setup and expanded it to include support for
esm
andcjs
bundles in addition to subpath exports setup for explicit import references for anyone interested. You can find it here.I have problem that the generated main.js has imports to 3rd party libs.
Generated main.js:
import { Button as i } from "./components/Button/Button.js";
import "react/jsx-runtime";
import "tailwind-variants";
import "@nextui-org/react";
export {
i as Button
};
But my main.ts looks like this:
export {Button} from './components/Button/Button'
I have all three of them in the exclude block:
external: ['react','react/jsx-runtime',"tailwind-variants","framer-motion",RegExp("^(@nextui-org/).+")],
Why do Vite add them to the final build?!
I had removed this plugin in the Vite.config:
import {libInjectCss} from 'vite-plugin-lib-inject-css'
Because I dont use css files I use Tailwind classes.
But when I add this lib back the imports are not added.. 🤯
I have no idea why.. but at least it works....
Interesting, I will investigate this. Do you have a public repo to reproduce?
Hi man!
I do not have a repo, this package is for internal use only.
But I created a sandbox for you to test with :). I tested and when you remove the libInjectCss from vite.config main.js gets the imports.. you run
pnpm build-sb
to build it andpnpm sb
to start the project.Sandbox Project
Hy thank you so much for the guide. I do have a question though.
if in my library i'd like to achieve an import like: d
how can i do it.
do i have to pass an array of entries like?
my structors is
lib/assest
lib/hooks
etc
So sorry for the dumb question
Hi Federico,
You should be able to do that with subpath exports.
First create a file
assets.ts
alongsidemain.ts
and export what you want:Then in
package.json
you can define the exports like so:You can read more about this here: nodejs.org/api/packages.html
Let me know if this works for you.
thanks for excellent article and sample code. The import CSS does not get transpiled to JS script. Thus I get run time error (when I use the library in another project).
For eg. Button/index.js has the following:
import "../../assets/index4.css";
Obvisiouly, this will not work in the brower. Should'nt this get transpiled as CSS Module ?
If the consuming environment does not have a bundler setup that supports CSS imports please see this answer: dev.to/receter/comment/2a198
You can disable these CSS imports and generate a CSS file that you can import sepparately.
thank you. Got it!
One question I have:
If my component depends on another npm module (say lodash), when I run vite...the dependency would be bundled into my index.js file....
So do I have lodash listed as a dependency in package.json? If so, wouldn't that mean consumers would transitively install lodash unnecessarily?
So seems like I should either:
external
Hello!
Thanks for the tutorial! It is great! Unfortunately I was not able fully finish it. After I added glob config to my vite.config.ts, the "npm run build" started to return an error:
failed to load config from ..../vite.config.ts
error during build:
file:///..../vite.config.ts.timestamp-1694619764411-22e8f4327550d.mjs:7
import glob from "file:///..../node_modules/glob/dist/mjs/index.js";
^^^^
SyntaxError: The requested module 'file:///..../node_modules/glob/dist/mjs/index.js' does not provide an export named 'default'
at ModuleJob._instantiate (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:122:21)
at async ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:188:5)
at async DefaultModuleLoader.import (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:228:24)
at async loadConfigFromBundledFile (file:///..../node_modules/vite/dist/node/chunks/dep-df561101.js:66235:21)
at async loadConfigFromFile (file:///..../node_modules/vite/dist/node/chunks/dep-df561101.js:66086:28)
at async resolveConfig (file:///..../node_modules/vite/dist/node/chunks/dep-df561101.js:65682:28)
at async build (file:///..../node_modules/vite/dist/node/chunks/dep-df561101.js:47852:20)
at async CAC. (file:///..../node_modules/vite/dist/node/cli.js:822:9)
I use npm version 9.8.0, nvm version 20.5.1, vite version
Best Regards,
Andrei
Hi Andrei,
thanks for your comment, I am glad you like the tutorial!
I guess you need to do a named import:
It was a "typo" in the article, I have updated it accordingly, thanks for your feedback!
Hello Andreas! Thanks a lot for the update! now everything works just perfectly!
I would need more detailed information to give you an helpful answer. Do you have a repo were this happens? Does it also happen when you install my demo npm library? (link at the bottom of the article) What bundler setup are you using?
@receter , thanks so much for this. Fantastic walkthrough!
Thank you