DEV Community

Cover image for Kotlin/Swift vs. React Native vs. Flutter – Which One Should You Choose?
Raji moshood
Raji moshood

Posted on

2

Kotlin/Swift vs. React Native vs. Flutter – Which One Should You Choose?

Native vs. Cross-Platform: The Ultimate Mobile App Development Battle

Kotlin/Swift vs. React Native vs. Flutter – Which One Should You Choose?

When building a mobile app, one of the biggest decisions is choosing between native development (Kotlin for Android, Swift for iOS) and cross-platform frameworks (React Native or Flutter).

Do you prioritize performance or cost? Developer availability or ease of maintenance?

Let’s break down the key differences to help you decide.

  1. Native Development (Kotlin & Swift) 🚀

Native development means building separate apps for Android (Kotlin) and iOS (Swift). This approach ensures the best performance and full access to device features.

Pros:

✅ Best Performance – Apps run natively, making them fast and responsive.
✅ Full Access to Device Features – No limitations when integrating with hardware.
✅ Smooth UI/UX – Designed for each platform’s guidelines.

Cons:

❌ Higher Development Cost – Requires two separate codebases.
❌ Longer Time to Market – Each platform needs independent development.
❌ More Maintenance Effort – Any update must be done twice.

💡 Best for: Performance-critical apps (e.g., games, AR/VR, fintech apps).

  1. React Native (Cross-Platform) ⚛️

Developed by Facebook, React Native allows you to build one codebase that works on both iOS and Android.

Pros:

✅ Faster Development – One codebase for both platforms.
✅ Cost-Effective – Reduces developer workload and expenses.
✅ Large Developer Community – Easy to find experienced engineers.

Cons:

⚠️ Slightly Lower Performance – Uses a JavaScript bridge, which can slow down complex apps.
⚠️ Limited Native Features – Some device APIs require extra work or native modules.
⚠️ UI Consistency Issues – Some platform-specific elements need extra customization.

💡 Best for: General business apps, social media platforms, and MVPs.

  1. Flutter (Cross-Platform) 🦋

Created by Google, Flutter uses the Dart language and renders UI with its own high-performance engine.

Pros:

✅ High Performance – Almost as fast as native apps.
✅ Beautiful, Customizable UI – Uses widgets for a consistent look across platforms.
✅ Single Codebase – One app for both iOS and Android.

Cons:

⚠️ Fewer Experienced Developers – Dart is less popular than JavaScript.
⚠️ Large App Size – Flutter apps are heavier than native or React Native apps.
⚠️ Limited Native Support – Requires additional work for some platform-specific features.

💡 Best for: Visually rich apps (e.g., e-commerce, media streaming, fintech).

Which One Should You Choose?

Go Native (Kotlin/Swift) if: You need the best performance and full device access.

Choose React Native if: You want faster development, lower costs, and strong JavaScript support.

Pick Flutter if: You need high performance with a customizable UI and don't mind learning Dart.

Final Thoughts:

There’s no one-size-fits-all solution. If you’re building an MVP or business app, React Native is a great choice. If performance is crucial, go native. If you love custom UI and animations, try Flutter.

📢 Which framework do you prefer? Let’s discuss in the comments!

MobileAppDevelopment #NativeVsCrossPlatform #Kotlin #Swift #ReactNative #Flutter #SoftwareEngineering #AppDevelopment

Quadratic AI

Quadratic AI – The Spreadsheet with AI, Code, and Connections

  • AI-Powered Insights: Ask questions in plain English and get instant visualizations
  • Multi-Language Support: Seamlessly switch between Python, SQL, and JavaScript in one workspace
  • Zero Setup Required: Connect to databases or drag-and-drop files straight from your browser
  • Live Collaboration: Work together in real-time, no matter where your team is located
  • Beyond Formulas: Tackle complex analysis that traditional spreadsheets can't handle

Get started for free.

Watch The Demo 📊✨

Top comments (4)

Collapse
 
yuliand profile image
Yulian David

I have a question, isn't it supposed that with the latest RN update that bridge was removed to move to a native integration with C++?

Collapse
 
raji_moshood_ee3a4c2638f6 profile image
Raji moshood • Edited

Not exactly. The traditional bridge is being phased out, but there’s still a communication layer, just a more efficient, C++-powered one. The new architecture reduces latency, improves threading, and enhances native integration, bringing it closer to native performance. I believe this will help! Cheers 🍻

Collapse
 
yuliand profile image
Yulian David

Thanks for the reply.

Thread Thread
 
raji_moshood_ee3a4c2638f6 profile image
Raji moshood

My pleasure

Image of PulumiUP 2025

Explore What’s Next in DevOps, IaC, and Security

Join us for demos, and learn trends, best practices, and lessons learned in Platform Engineering & DevOps, Cloud and IaC, and Security.

Save Your Spot

👋 Kindness is contagious

Value this insightful article and join the thriving DEV Community. Developers of every skill level are encouraged to contribute and expand our collective knowledge.

A simple “thank you” can uplift someone’s spirits. Leave your appreciation in the comments!

On DEV, exchanging expertise lightens our path and reinforces our bonds. Enjoyed the read? A quick note of thanks to the author means a lot.

Okay