jsperf.com/loop-vs-map-vs-foreach/22
So, map and classical for loop. But it is usually more semantically to use forEach rather than map, albeit slow.
map
forEach
for loop isn't so bad, but it depends on the use case.
for loop
Why is it more semantical to write "arr.forEach(...)" instead of "for (... of arr)" ? Seems merely a matter of syntax and taste to me ...
I would absolutely consider this to be a matter of taste
I meant arr.forEach() vs arr.map().
arr.forEach()
arr.map()
for of and for in are another species, and is whether you want it to be functional or procedural. Neither is better than the others.
for of
for in
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
jsperf.com/loop-vs-map-vs-foreach/22
So,
mapand classical for loop. But it is usually more semantically to useforEachrather thanmap, albeit slow.for loopisn't so bad, but it depends on the use case.Why is it more semantical to write "arr.forEach(...)" instead of "for (... of arr)" ? Seems merely a matter of syntax and taste to me ...
I would absolutely consider this to be a matter of taste
I meant
arr.forEach()vsarr.map().for ofandfor inare another species, and is whether you want it to be functional or procedural. Neither is better than the others.