Passionate generalist conquering the web one project at a time. Whether authoring libraries for node, JS, PHP, or Rust, I am always on the lookout for better solutions to common problems.
Location
USA
Work
Lead Developer & Co-founder at corpscrypt, CTO at REtech
It was, but in any case you have to have server to deliver your code. hqjs.org is the server that avoid bundling and ensure that you browser get as little code as possible to run your app. It might not suite if you want to serve your app let's say from github, but can do the trick in m any other cases.
Looks interesting. In the past, I used Stencil.js, though. Might be replaceable with hqjs, (with jsx-to-html converter, just to avoid long html strings).
Passionate generalist conquering the web one project at a time. Whether authoring libraries for node, JS, PHP, or Rust, I am always on the lookout for better solutions to common problems.
Location
USA
Work
Lead Developer & Co-founder at corpscrypt, CTO at REtech
HTML/CSS & JS will all survive for the time being. But yes, WebAssembly will make the same path I outlined here. Right now it's a little "clunky" to use, but that will change and will surely expand the web in a way never seen possible. What Google started with ChromeOS might progress into the next logical step: PCs will become simple "Internet terminals" and everything will be available through what we call a browser today.
As for the framework question: As mentioned, I like it simple and small. Since I personally work a lot backend, lit-html and axios is all I need to fulfill my needs.
Online since 1990 Yes! I started with Gopher. I do modern Web Component Development with technologies supported by **all** WHATWG partners (Apple, Google, Microsoft & Mozilla)
What is the best framework to use with Web Components? Perhaps even something like SnowPack? Or perhaps, Webpack or Parcel.js?
Actually, I hope that HTML/CSS/JS will all die. Only backend compilation to WebAssembly remains.
But in reality, at least HTML will probably survive.
You can try hqjs.org server. It works with web components as well as with different frameworks and metalanguages as typescript and scss
Thanks. But I run these with neoan3 as this
Gives me the possibility to generate the skeleton of a new custom element via cli
Allows me to use server side variables with ease
Provides me with a unified system when developing API/backend
Serve/use without building process or development server
Edit: sorry. I now realize that your suggestion is targeted at somebody else.
It was, but in any case you have to have server to deliver your code. hqjs.org is the server that avoid bundling and ensure that you browser get as little code as possible to run your app. It might not suite if you want to serve your app let's say from github, but can do the trick in m any other cases.
Looks interesting. In the past, I used Stencil.js, though. Might be replaceable with hqjs, (with jsx-to-html converter, just to avoid long html strings).
aloud-comments.web.app/
HTML/CSS & JS will all survive for the time being. But yes, WebAssembly will make the same path I outlined here. Right now it's a little "clunky" to use, but that will change and will surely expand the web in a way never seen possible. What Google started with ChromeOS might progress into the next logical step: PCs will become simple "Internet terminals" and everything will be available through what we call a browser today.
As for the framework question: As mentioned, I like it simple and small. Since I personally work a lot backend, lit-html and axios is all I need to fulfill my needs.
I started with Z80 assembly in 1979
If assembly languages were better we would never have had BASIC, Turbo-Pascal, Delphi, ActionScript, PHP, Go, Python, and name them all
The best Web Components learning track is to start with native.
Learn what food is, learn what paint is, learn what Web Components are
Frameworks and Libraries like Lit, are tools to help you produce faster, not better,