ParadeTo
/
video-filter
Video filter realized by JS, WASM, WebGL
video-filter
Video filter realized by JS, WASM, WebGL
I set a flag previously, which is to implement video filter effect in real time by Rust WebAssembly. Now let's complete it.
Firstly, we can setup the development environment according to Rust and WebAssembly.
After reading wasm-bindgen document, we found the CanvasRenderingContext2d object can be passed from JS to WASM:
import('./pkg')
.then((wasm) => {
...
const ctx = canvas.getContext('2d')
...
wasm.draw(ctx, 600, 600, -0.15, 0.65)
})
.catch(console.error)
use web_sys::{CanvasRenderingContext2d, ImageData};
#[wasm_bindgen]
pub fn draw(
ctx: &CanvasRenderingContext2d,
width: u32,
height: u32,
real: f64,
imaginary: f64,
) -> Result<(), JsValue> {
// The real workhorse of this algorithm, generating pixel data
let c = Complex { real, imaginary };
let data = get_julia_set(width, height, c);
let data = ImageData::new_with_u8_clamped_array_and_sh(Clamped(&data), width, height)?;
ctx.put_image_data(&data, 0.0, 0.0)
}
So, the implementation is very similar to JS:
#[wasm_bindgen]
pub fn filter(
ctx_hidden: &CanvasRenderingContext2d,
ctx: &CanvasRenderingContext2d,
width: u32,
height: u32,
kernel: Vec<f32>,
) {
set_panic_hook();
// Like const imageData = ctx.getImageData(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height) in JS
let image_data = ctx_hidden
.get_image_data(0.0, 0.0, width as f64, height as f64)
.unwrap();
// Like imageData.data in JS
let mut data = image_data.data();
let data_ref = data.deref_mut();
let h = (kernel.len() as f64).sqrt() as u32;
let half = h / 2;
// Image convolution
for y in half..(height - half) {
for x in half..(width - half) {
let px = ((y * width + x) * 4) as usize;
let mut r = 0_f32;
let mut g = 0_f32;
let mut b = 0_f32;
for cy in 0..h {
for cx in 0..h {
let cpx = (((y + cy - half) * width + (x + cx - half)) * 4) as usize;
let k = kernel[(cy * h + cx) as usize];
r += (data_ref[cpx + 0] as f32) * k;
g += (data_ref[cpx + 1] as f32) * k;
b += (data_ref[cpx + 2] as f32) * k;
}
}
data_ref[px + 0] = r as u8;
data_ref[px + 1] = g as u8;
data_ref[px + 2] = b as u8;
}
}
// Create new imageData using modified data
let image_data =
ImageData::new_with_u8_clamped_array_and_sh(Clamped(data_ref), width, height).unwrap();
// Like ctx.putImageData(imageData, 0, 0) in JS
ctx.put_image_data(&image_data, 0.0, 0.0)
.expect("put image data panic")
}
Comparing the JS and Rust WASM, we found that Rust WASM performs better:
Of course, we can still refer to the previous Golang approach by sharing memory between JS and WASM. We can find an example:
use std::ptr;
use wasm_bindgen::prelude::*;
#[wasm_bindgen]
pub fn take_pointer_by_value(x: *mut u8) {}
#[wasm_bindgen]
pub fn return_pointer() -> *mut u8 {
ptr::null_mut()
}
import {
take_pointer_by_value,
return_pointer,
} from './guide_supported_types_examples'
import {memory} from './guide_supported_types_examples_bg'
let ptr = return_pointer()
let buf = new Uint8Array(memory.buffer)
let value = buf[ptr]
console.log(`The byte at the ${ptr} address is ${value}`)
take_pointer_by_value(ptr)
The following figure explains the code above:
In WASM, you can access or modify the shared memory through the pointer offset. But in JS, as memory.buffer is ArrayBuffer type, you cannot directly manipulate the contents of it. Instead, you need to create one of the "typed array objects" like Uint8Array to read and write the contents of the buffer. In addition to Uint8Array, there are other types such as Uint16Array. Refer to MDN for more information. They differ mainly in the range of array elements' value and the number of bytes every element takes up. For example, if we replace the type by 'Uint16Array', the figure will be like this:
So, by shared memory, we can synchronize image data from JS to WASM, then modify the shared memory value in WASM, and finally read the updated result from the shared memory. The code will be like this:
#[wasm_bindgen]
pub fn filter_shared_mem(ptr: *mut u8, width: u32, height: u32, kernel: Vec<f32>) {
unsafe {
let h = (kernel.len() as f64).sqrt() as u32;
let half = h / 2;
for y in half..(height - half) {
for x in half..(width - half) {
let px = ((y * width + x) * 4) as usize;
let mut r = 0_f32;
let mut g = 0_f32;
let mut b = 0_f32;
for cy in 0..h {
for cx in 0..h {
let cpx = (((y + cy - half) * width + (x + cx - half)) * 4) as usize;
let k = kernel[(cy * h + cx) as usize];
r += (*ptr.wrapping_add(cpx + 0) as f32) * k;
g += (*ptr.wrapping_add(cpx + 1) as f32) * k;
b += (*ptr.wrapping_add(cpx + 2) as f32) * k;
}
}
*ptr.wrapping_add(px + 0) = r as u8;
*ptr.wrapping_add(px + 1) = g as u8;
*ptr.wrapping_add(px + 2) = b as u8;
}
}
}
}
import {return_pointer, filter_shared_mem} from 'rust-filter/rust_filter'
import {memory} from 'rust-filter/rust_filter_bg.wasm'
const ptr = return_pointer()
const uint8ClampedArray = new Uint8ClampedArray(memory.buffer)
// Sync imageData to shared memory
const imageData = ctx.getImageData(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height)
uint8ClampedArray.set(imageData)
// Update shared memory
filter_shared_mem(
ptr,
canvas.width,
canvas.height,
new Float32Array([].concat(...kernel))
)
// Update imageData using modified memory.buffer, as the memory.buffer's size is larger than our image's data, we need to slice.
pixels.data.set(
new Uint8ClampedArray(memory.buffer).slice(
0,
canvas.width * canvas.height * 4
)
)
// Render to canvas
ctx.putImageData(imageData, 0, 0)
It turns out that shared memory approach performs better:
Top comments (0)