Yep, that's the headache I've been trying to avoid. It seems that with Typescript it's generally possible to avoid DRY violations between types and expressions, but it's pretty hard to avoid with JSDoc.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Nope, looks like the JSDoc types parser doesn't know about
as constat all, you'd need to re-type it inside an@typesto get the literal typesYep, that's the headache I've been trying to avoid. It seems that with Typescript it's generally possible to avoid DRY violations between types and expressions, but it's pretty hard to avoid with JSDoc.