Are there functions similar to Ruby's `dig` in other languages?

It's known as optional chaining / null propagation.
In Javascript it's described as ECMAScript proposal

instead of writing:

const phone = orders && orders[0] && orders[0].customer && orders[0].customer.phone

it could be like:

const phone = orders?[0]?.customer?.phone

For now, there are libraries like lodash/get, where we can use function:

import { get } from 'lodash'
const phone = get(orders[0], 'customer.phone', 'optional default value')

For Python, glom is a great package for this sort of nested data access. The happy path from the intro docs looks like this:

from glom import glom

target = {'a': {'b': {'c': 'd'}}}
glom(target, 'a.b.c')  # returns 'd'

That 'a.b.c' bit is a simple glom specifier, but it can get much wilder! Glom provides more advanced specifiers for features like:

• Null coalescing behavior
• Validation
• Debugging/inspection

And you can always plug in your own code or extend glom even further. Simple to get started, but a long fun road to travel from there!

PHP7 introduced the null coalesce operator (??) which will suppress errors for the missing intermediate keys. So, this will work without errors/warnings:

$phone = $orders[0]['customer']['phone'] ?? null;

The Laravel framework in PHP also has array helpers which allow you to access values using "dot" notation:

$phone = array_get($orders, '0.customer.phone');

You can pass a third value to use as the default if it doesn't exist, but the default is null without it.

This helper function is a shortcut to access the Arr::get() method mentioned by Suhayb Alghutaymil.

I'm currently doing Rust, and I have a little trouble answering this question.

A couple points:

• Rust does not have anything like dig built-in.
• It wouldn't make sense, as there is no nil/null/whatever in Rust - if it's a String, it's there, no strings attached (pun intended).
• To represent a value that might not be there, there is a concept of an Option enum, which can be either Some(value) or None (the concept is not new - Haskell has Maybe, and languages like Swift or Kotlin have nullable types)
• A macro can probably do something like that for nested Options.

I came up with this:

macro_rules! dig {
   ( $root:ident, $($step:ident),+ $(,)? ) => {
      {
         let leaf = $root;
         $(
            let leaf = leaf.and_then(|inner| inner.$step);
         )+
         leaf
      }
   }
}

Looks a bit funky, but does the job:

let c = Some(C {                                   
    b: Some(B {                                    
        a: Some(A { data: 5 }),                    
    }),                                            
});                                                
assert_eq!(Some(5), dig!(c, b, a).map(|a| a.data));

let c = Some(C { b: None });                    
assert_eq!(None, dig!(c, b, a).map(|a| a.data));

EDIT: I completely forgot about a cool language feature in Rust - ? operator.

Synopsis:

Result<T, E> is very similar to Option<T>, but it instead can be either Ok(T) (all good, T is the value) or Err(E) (something went wrong, E is the error type - String for a message, etc.)

result? basically means .if it's Ok, get the inner value and continue execution. If it's an Err, return it".

It allows for code like this:

fn etl(data: ...) -> Result<..., Error> {
    data.extract()?.transform()?.load()
}

C# 6.0 and onwards gives you the Null Propagating Operator MSDN Guide — like many of the other languages here, you would use it something like:

var customerName = orders[0]?.customer?.name;

This can be combined with the null coalescing operator, to give a default value:

var customerName = orders[0]?.customer?.name ?? "No value found.";

In Laravel you could use this with Arr::get helper method.

use Illuminate\Support\Arr;

$array = ['products' => ['desk' => ['price' => 100]]];

$price = Arr::get($array, 'products.desk.price');

// 100

In Java (version 8 and onward) this can be done using Optional

String phoneNumber = Optional.ofNullable(list.get(0))
                             .map(Order::getCustomer)
                             .map(Customer::getPhone)
                             .orElse(null);

Haskell and other functional languages have Lenses, which are roughly equivalent to focusing on a value or path and either getting or setting it. Imagine dig with a related bury function and you get close.

I'd mentioned it in this particular Storybook post in Part Four, though it may make more sense to start at Part One for continuity

In Elixir use Kernel.get_in/2 for maps

iex(1)> m = %{foo: %{bar: %{baz: 1}}}
%{foo: %{bar: %{baz: 1}}}
iex(2)> get_in m, [:foo, :bar, :baz]
1
iex(3)> get_in m, [:foo, :zot]
nil

Kotlin

orders.firstOrNull()?.customer?.phone