DEV Community

Cover image for "Exploring the Art of Code Refactoring: Best Practices and Real-World Experiences"
nigamtarun018
nigamtarun018

Posted on

"Exploring the Art of Code Refactoring: Best Practices and Real-World Experiences"

Code refactoring is a crucial aspect of software development, but it often gets overlooked or delayed due to time constraints and prioritization of new features. However, taking the time to regularly refactor code can improve its maintainability, performance, and scalability, and make it easier for new team members to understand and work with.

The question is, when is the right time to refactor code? Should it be done incrementally as new features are added or should it be set aside as a dedicated project? What are the best practices for successful code refactoring? And how do we strike a balance between the immediate benefits of new features and the long-term benefits of a clean codebase?

Let's start a discussion on the topic of code refactoring and share our experiences, tips, and best practices. Let's see how we can all improve the quality of our code for the better.

Oldest comments (2)

Collapse
 
akshaynigam10 profile image
Akshay Nigam

Indeed need to think on balance between the immediate benefits of new features and the long-term benefits of a clean codebase....

Collapse
 
theaccordance profile image
Joe Mainwaring • Edited

The question is, when is the right time to refactor code?

The right time to refactor code is when it becomes necessary. Pre-optimization contributes to many failures with software projects.

What are the best practices for successful code refactoring?

  • Clarity on the primary objective (ex: Delivering a feature)
  • Having a solid understanding of how the existing code is used - you don't want your refactor creating a ton of bugs because you weren't aware of a certain use-case.
  • Avoid scope-creep: Get your original refactor done and then revisit if you identified something else that should be refactored.
  • Read all the F*cking Manuals. A LOT of pattern opinions exist in regards to programming, and most of them are valid - in specific contexts. I prefer to lay down code in a way that requires the least amount of documentation on my part - which typically means following the patterns documented by the libraries I use.
  • DON'T RECREATE THE WHEEL. You may think you're clever writing implementing your own pattern instead of using what comes out-of-the-box but you're likely adding tech debt that someone will bitch about long after you've departed.

how do we strike a balance between the immediate benefits of new features and the long-term benefits of a clean codebase?

Accept that perfection is a vision, not a destination. If you care about your work, you'll always set out to create clean code that doesn't need to be refactored, but you can't predict the future. For example: I wrote very clean AngularJS for several years in the 2010s, but all of that code became tech debt once Angular shifted to TypeScript.