Talent is talent, regardless of age, gender, etc. Though to be fair I don't think the OP was intentionally compartmentalising based on gender.
IMO, the misguided point of view in the article is the notion that there is some magic threshold or time-period where one suddenly loses one's classification as a "junior" dev
I’d just like to add that there are very talented non-male tech people out there. (Your article only uses he/him).
Talent is talent, regardless of age, gender, etc. Though to be fair I don't think the OP was intentionally compartmentalising based on gender.
IMO, the misguided point of view in the article is the notion that there is some magic threshold or time-period where one suddenly loses one's classification as a "junior" dev
This was completely unintentional. Thanks anyway. Updated here more :
Figure out: how 'junior' a junior developer is!!! ( Now Answers)
manish srivastava ・ Nov 5 ・ 13 min read
I didn't think it was done on purpose 🙏 Just something to be aware of.
I often catch myself thinking, talking or writing about "a male developer" because I'm a male developer.
No Niel this was not the case as I said earlier. But I have noted a valid point from you. Thanks