Thanks for your feedback. I understand your point. On-demand feedback would be the miminum to provide.
Now think about the parallel with deployment. Deployment is hard, hence people tend to avoid it. Whereas it's counter-intuitive, but you should actually deploy more often.
I believe this is the same with feedback. If you change your selection process to be feedback-centric, it would be a no-brainer, and "free".
I've had at least one experience when notes from the program committee members were sent to me, without me asking. It was not a commercial conference.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Thanks for your feedback. I understand your point. On-demand feedback would be the miminum to provide.
Now think about the parallel with deployment. Deployment is hard, hence people tend to avoid it. Whereas it's counter-intuitive, but you should actually deploy more often.
I believe this is the same with feedback. If you change your selection process to be feedback-centric, it would be a no-brainer, and "free".
I've had at least one experience when notes from the program committee members were sent to me, without me asking. It was not a commercial conference.