I moved my blog from WordPress to GitLab Pages in... 2016. I'm happy with the solution. However, I used GitHub Pages when I was teaching for both the courses and the exercises, e.g., Java EE. At the time, there was no GitHub Actions: I used Travis CI to build and deploy.
Recently, I had to use GitHub Pages to publish my Apache APISIX workshop. Travis is no longer free. GitHub Actions are a thing. I used the now nominal path and faced a few hurdles; here are my findings.
GitHub Pages, at the time
The previous usage of GitHub Pages was pretty straightforward. You pushed to a specific branch, gh-pages
. GitHub Pages rendered the root of the branch as a website.
Travis works by watching a .travis.yml
build file at the repository root. When it detects a change, it runs it. I designed the script to build HTML from Asciidoc sources and push it to the branch. Here's the significant bit:
after_success:
# - ...
- git push --force --quiet "https://${GH_TOKEN}@${GH_REF}" master:gh-pages > /dev/null 2>&1
GitHub Pages now
When you enable GitHub Pages, you can choose its source: GitHub Actions or Deploy from a branch. I used a workflow to generate HTML from Asciidoctor, and my mistake was selecting the first choice.
GitHub Pages from a branch
If you choose Deploy from a branch, you can select the branch name and the source root folder. Apart from that, the behavior is similar to the pre-GitHub Action behavior. A vast difference, however, is that GitHub runs a GitHub Action after each push to the branch, whether the push happens via an Action or not.
While you can see the workflow executions, you cannot access its YAML source. By default, the build
job in the workflow runs the following phases:
- Set up job
- Pull the Jekyll build page Action
- Checkout
- Build with Jekyll
- Upload artifact
- Post Checkout
- Complete job
Indeed, whether you want it or not, GitHub Pages builds for Jekyll! I don't want it because I generate HTML from Asciidoc. To prevent Jekyll build, you can put a .nojekyll
file at the root of the Pages branch. With it, the phases are:
- Set up job
- Checkout
- Upload artifact
- Post Checkout
- Complete job
No more Jekyll!
GitHub Pages from Actions
The pages-build-deployment
Action above creates a tar.gz
archive and uploads it to the Pages site. The alternative is to deploy yourself using a custom GitHub workflow. The GitHub Marketplace offers Actions to help you with it:
- configure-github-pages: extracts various metadata about a site so that later actions can use them;
- upload-pages-artifact: packages and uploads the GitHub Page artifact
- deploy-pages: deploys a Pages site previously uploaded as an artifact
The documentation does an excellent job of explaining how to use them across your custom workflow.
Conclusion
Deploying to GitHub Pages offers two options: either from a branch or from a custom workflow. In the first case, you only have to push to the configured branch; GitHub will handle the internal mechanics to make it work via a provided workflow. You don't need to pay attention to the logs. The alternative is to create your custom workflow and assemble the provided GitHub Actions.
Once I understood the options, I made the first one work. It's good enough for me, and I don't need to care about GitHub Pages' internal workings.
To go further:
- GitHub Pages
- Using custom workflows with GitHub Pages
- configure-github-pages Marketplace Action
- upload-pages-artifact Marketplace Action
- deploy-pages Marketplace Action
Originally published at A Java Geek on June 16th, 2024
Top comments (2)
Hello everyone, I've developed an action package to easily deploy your Vite applications to GitHub Pages via Actions, it is pretty straightforward and utilizes the latest techniques mentioned on this article. As long as you use Vite, you can deploy any frontend app you wish: React, Vue, Svelte... Go ahead and check it out:
Nice article by the way, concise yet contains all the necessary details.
Great write-up, we have a bunch of articles on Github Actions in our Newsletter, check it out - packagemain.tech/p/github-actions-...