If you're a JavaScript developer and want to improve your coding, then you should be familiar with the most commonly used ES5 and ES6+ array methods.
These methods make coding a lot easier and also make your code look clean and easy to understand.
So in this article, we will explore some of the most popular and widely used array methods. So let's get started.
The Array.forEach Method
The Array.forEach
method has the following syntax:
Array.forEach(callback(currentValue [, index [, array]])[, thisArg]);
The forEach
method executes a provided function once for every element in the array.
Take a look at the below code:
const months = ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April'];
months.forEach(function(month) {
console.log(month);
});
/* output
January
February
March
April
*/
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Here, inside the forEach
loop callback function, each element of the array is automatically passed as the first parameter of the function.
The equivalent for loop code for the above example looks like this:
const months = ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April'];
for(let i = 0; i < months.length; i++) {
console.log(months[i]);
}
/* output
January
February
March
April
*/
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
The thing you need to keep in mind is that the forEach
method does not return any value.
Take a look at the below code:
const months = ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April'];
const returnedValue = months.forEach(function (month) {
return month;
});
console.log('returnedValue: ', returnedValue); // undefined
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Note that
forEach
is only used to loop through the array and perform some processing or logging. It does not return any value, even if you explicitly return a value from the callback function (this means that the returned value comes asundefined
in the above example).
In all the above examples, we have used only the first parameter of the callback function. But the callback function also receives two additional parameters, which are:
- index - the index of the element which is currently being iterated
- array - original array which we're looping over
const months = ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April'];
months.forEach(function(month, index, array) {
console.log(month, index, array);
});
/* output
January 0 ["January", "February", "March", "April"]
February 1 ["January", "February", "March", "April"]
March 2 ["January", "February", "March", "April"]
April 3 ["January", "February", "March", "April"]
*/
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Depending on the requirement, you may find it useful to use the index
and array
parameters.
Advantages of using forEach instead of a for loop
- Using a
forEach
loop makes your code shorter and easier to understand - When using a
forEach
loop, we don't need to keep track of how many elements are available in the array. So it avoids the creation of an extra counter variable. - Using a
forEach
loop makes code easy to debug because there are no extra variables for looping through the array - The
forEach
loop automatically stops when all the elements of the array are finished iterating.
Browser Support
- All modern browsers and Internet Explorer (IE) version 9 and above
- Microsoft Edge version 12 and above
The Array.map Method
The Array map method is the most useful and widely used array method among all other methods.
The Array.map
method has the following syntax:
Array.map(function callback(currentValue[, index[, array]]) {
// Return element for new_array
}[, thisArg])
The map
method executes a provided function once for every element in the array and it returns a new transformed array.
Take a look at the below code:
const months = ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April'];
const transformedArray = months.map(function (month) {
return month.toUpperCase();
});
console.log(transformedArray); // ["JANUARY", "FEBRUARY", "MARCH", "APRIL"]
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
In the above code, inside the callback function, we’re converting each element to uppercase and returning it.
The equivalent for loop code for the above example looks like this:
const months = ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April'];
const converted = [];
for(let i = 0; i < months.length; i++) {
converted.push(months[i].toUpperCase());
};
console.log(converted); // ["JANUARY", "FEBRUARY", "MARCH", "APRIL"]
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Using map
helps to avoid creating a separate converted
array beforehand for storing the converted elements. So it saves memory space and also the code looks much cleaner using array map
, like this:
const months = ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April'];
console.log(months.map(function (month) {
return month.toUpperCase();
})); // ["JANUARY", "FEBRUARY", "MARCH", "APRIL"]
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Note that the map
method returns a new array that is of the exact same length as the original array.
The difference between the forEach
and map
methods is that forEach
is only used for looping and does not return anything back. On the other hand, the map
method returns a new array that is of the exact same length as the original array.
Also, note that map
does not change the original array but returns a new array.
Take a look at the below code:
const users = [
{
first_name: 'Mike',
last_name: 'Sheridan'
},
{
first_name: 'Tim',
last_name: 'Lee'
},
{
first_name: 'John',
last_name: 'Carte'
}
];
const usersList = users.map(function (user) {
return user.first_name + ' ' + user.last_name;
});
console.log(usersList); // ["Mike Sheridan", "Tim Lee", "John Carte"]
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Here, by using the array of objects and map
methods, we're easily generating a single array with first and last name concatenated.
In the above code, we're using the +
operator to concatenate two values. But it's much more common to use ES6 template literal syntax as shown below:
const users = [
{
first_name: 'Mike',
last_name: 'Sheridan'
},
{
first_name: 'Tim',
last_name: 'Lee'
},
{
first_name: 'John',
last_name: 'Carte'
}
];
const usersList = users.map(function (user) {
return `${user.first_name} ${user.last_name}`;
});
console.log(usersList); // ["Mike Sheridan", "Tim Lee", "John Carte"]
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
The array map
method is also useful, if you want to extract only specific data from the array like this:
const users = [
{
first_name: 'Mike',
last_name: 'Sheridan',
age: 30
},
{
first_name: 'Tim',
last_name: 'Lee',
age: 45
},
{
first_name: 'John',
last_name: 'Carte',
age: 25
}
];
const surnames = users.map(function (user) {
return user.last_name;
});
console.log(surnames); // ["Sheridan", "Lee", "Carte"]
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
In the above code, we're extracting only the last names of each user and storing them in an array.
We can even use map
to generate an array with dynamic content as shown below:
const users = [
{
first_name: 'Mike',
location: 'London'
},
{
first_name: 'Tim',
location: 'US'
},
{
first_name: 'John',
location: 'Australia'
}
];
const usersList = users.map(function (user) {
return `${user.first_name} lives in ${user.location}`;
});
console.log(usersList); // ["Mike lives in London", "Tim lives in US", "John lives in Australia"]
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Note that in the above code, we're not changing the original users
array. We're creating a new array with dynamic content because map
always returns a new array.
Advantages of using the map method
- It helps quickly generate a new array without changing the original array
- It helps generate an array with dynamic content based on each element
- It allows us to quickly extract any element of the array
- It generates an array with the exact same length as the original array
Browser Support:
- All modern browsers and Internet Explorer (IE) version 9 and above
- Microsoft Edge version 12 and above
The Array.find Method
The Array.find
method has the following syntax:
Array.find(callback(element[, index[, array]])[, thisArg])
The
find
method returns thevalue
of thefirst element
in the array that satisfies the provided test condition.
The find
method takes a callback function as the first argument and executes the callback function for every element of the array. Each array element value is passed as the first parameter to the callback function.
Suppose, we have a list of employees like this:
const employees = [
{ name: "David Carlson", age: 30 },
{ name: "John Cena", age: 34 },
{ name: "Mike Sheridan", age: 25 },
{ name: "John Carte", age: 50 }
];
and we want to get the record for the employee whose name is John
. In this case, we can use the find
method as shown below:
const employee = employees.find(function (employee) {
return employee.name.indexOf('John') > -1;
});
console.log(employee); // { name: "John Cena", age: 34 }
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Even though there is "John Carte"
in the list, the find
method will stop when it finds the first match. So it will not return the object with the name "John Carte"
.
The equivalent for loop code for the above example looks like this:
const employees = [
{ name: "David Carlson", age: 30 },
{ name: "John Cena", age: 34 },
{ name: "Mike Sheridan", age: 25 },
{ name: "John Carte", age: 50 }
];
let user;
for(let i = 0; i < employees.length; i++) {
if(employees[i].name.indexOf('John') > -1) {
user = employees[i];
break;
}
}
console.log(user); // { name: "John Cena", age: 34 }
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
As you can see, using normal for loop makes the code much larger and harder to understand. But using the find
method, we can write the same code in an easy to understand way.
Advantages of using the find method
- It allows us to quickly find any element without writing a lot of code
- It stops looping as soon as it finds a match so there is no need for an extra break statement
Browser Support:
- All modern browsers except Internet Explorer (IE)
- Microsoft Edge version 12 and above
The Array.findIndex Method
The Array.findIndex
method has the following syntax:
Array.findIndex(callback(element[, index[, array]])[, thisArg])
The findIndex
method returns the index
of the first element in the array that satisfies the provided test condition
. Otherwise, it returns -1
, indicating that no element passed the test.
const employees = [
{ name: 'David Carlson', age: 30 },
{ name: 'John Cena', age: 34 },
{ name: 'Mike Sheridan', age: 25 },
{ name: 'John Carte', age: 50 }
];
const index = employees.findIndex(function (employee) {
return employee.name.indexOf('John') > -1;
});
console.log(index); // 1
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Here we get the output as 1
which is the index of the first object with the name John
. Note that the index starts with zero.
The equivalent for loop code for the above example looks like this:
const employees = [
{ name: 'David Carlson', age: 30 },
{ name: 'John Cena', age: 34 },
{ name: 'Mike Sheridan', age: 25 },
{ name: 'John Carte', age: 50 }
];
let index = -1;
for(let i = 0; i < employees.length; i++) {
if(employees[i].name.indexOf('John') > -1) {
index = i;
break;
}
}
console.log(index); // 1
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Advantages of using the findIndex method
- It allows us to quickly find the index of an element without writing a lot of code
- It stops looping as soon as it finds a match so there is no need for an extra break statement
- We can find the index using the array
find
method also, but using findIndex makes it easy and avoids creating extra variables to store the index
Browser Support:
- All modern browsers except Internet Explorer (IE)
- Microsoft Edge version 12 and above
The Array.filter Method
The Array.filter
method has the following syntax:
Array.filter(callback(element[, index[, array]])[, thisArg])
The filter
method returns a new array
with all the elements that satisfy the provided test condition.
The filter
method takes a callback function as the first argument and executes the callback function for every element of the array. Each array element value is passed as the first parameter to the callback function.
const employees = [
{ name: 'David Carlson', age: 30 },
{ name: 'John Cena', age: 34 },
{ name: 'Mike Sheridan', age: 25 },
{ name: 'John Carte', age: 50 }
];
const employee = employees.filter(function (employee) {
return employee.name.indexOf('John') > -1;
});
console.log(employee); // [ { name: "John Cena", age: 34 }, { name: "John Carte", age: 50 }]
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
As can be seen in the above code, using filter
helps to find all the elements from the array that match the specified test condition.
So using filter
does not stop when it finds a particular match but keeps checking for other elements in the array that match the condition. Then it returns all the matching elements from the array.
The main difference between
find
andfilter
is that find only returns the first matching element of the array, but usingfilter
returns all the matching elements from the array.
Note that the filter
method always returns an array. If no element passes the test condition, an empty array will be returned.
The equivalent for loop code for the above example looks like this:
const employees = [
{ name: 'David Carlson', age: 30 },
{ name: 'John Cena', age: 34 },
{ name: 'Mike Sheridan', age: 25 },
{ name: 'John Carte', age: 50 }
];
let filtered = [];
for(let i = 0; i < employees.length; i++) {
if(employees[i].name.indexOf('John') > -1) {
filtered.push(employees[i]);
}
}
console.log(filtered); // [ { name: "John Cena", age: 34 }, { name: "John Carte", age: 50 }]
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Advantages of using the filter method
- It allows us to quickly find all the matching elements from the array
- It always returns an array even if there is no match, so it avoids writing extra
if
conditions - It avoids the need of creating an extra variable to store the filtered elements
Browser Support:
- All modern browsers and Internet Explorer (IE) version 9 and above
- Microsoft Edge version 12 and above
The Array.every Method
The Array.every
method has the following syntax:
Array.every(callback(element[, index[, array]])[, thisArg])
The every
method tests whether all elements in the array pass the provided test conditions and returns a boolean true
or false
value.
Suppose we have an array of numbers and we want to check if every element of the array is a positive number. We can use the every
method to achieve it.
let numbers = [10, -30, 20, 50];
let allPositive = numbers.every(function (number) {
return number > 0;
});
console.log(allPositive); // false
numbers = [10, 30, 20, 50];
allPositive = numbers.every(function (number) {
return number > 0;
});
console.log(allPositive); // true
Imagine you have a registration form, and you want to check if all of the required fields are entered or not before submitting the form. You can use every
method to check for each field value easily.
window.onload = function () {
const form = document.getElementById('registration_form');
form.addEventListener('submit', function (event) {
event.preventDefault();
const fields = ['first_name', 'last_name', 'email', 'city'];
const allFieldsEntered = fields.every(function (fieldId) {
return document.getElementById(fieldId).value.trim() !== '';
});
if (allFieldsEntered) {
console.log('All the fields are entered');
// All the field values are entered, submit the form
} else {
alert('Please, fill out all the field values.');
}
});
};
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Here, inside the callback function of the every
method, we’re checking if each field value is not empty and returning a boolean value.
In the above code, the every
method returns true
if, for all the elements in the fields
array, the callback function returns a true
value.
If the callback function returns a false
value for any of the elements in the fields
array, then the every
method will return false
as the result.
Advantage of using the every
method
- It allows us to quickly check if all the elements match certain criteria without writing a lot of code
Browser Support:
- All modern browsers and Internet Explorer (IE) version 9 and above
- Microsoft Edge version 12 and above
The Array.some Method
The Array.some
method has the following syntax:
Array.some(callback(element[, index[, array]])[, thisArg]
The some
method tests whether at least one element in the array passes the test condition given by the provided function and returns a boolean true
or false
value.
It returns true
once it finds the first match and returns false
if there is no match.
Suppose we have an array of numbers and we want to check if the array contains at least one positive element. We can use the some
method to achieve it.
let numbers = [-30, 40, 20, 50];
let containsPositive = numbers.some(function (number) {
return number > 0;
});
console.log(containsPositive); // true
numbers = [-10, -30, -20, -50];
containsPositive = numbers.every(function (number) {
return number > 0;
});
console.log(containsPositive); // false
There are some useful scenarios for using the some
method.
Some
method example 1:
Let's say we have a list of employees and we want to check if a particular employee is present in that array or not. We also want to get the index position of that employee if the employee is found.
So instead of using the find
and findIndex
methods separately, we can use the some
method to do both of these.
const employees = [
{ name: 'David Carlson', age: 30 },
{ name: 'John Cena', age: 34 },
{ name: 'Mike Sheridon', age: 25 },
{ name: 'John Carte', age: 50 }
];
let indexValue = -1;
const employee = employees.some(function (employee, index) {
const isFound = employee.name.indexOf('John') > -1;
if (isFound) {
indexValue = index;
}
return isFound;
});
console.log(employee, indexValue); // true 1
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Some
method example 2:
The array forEach
, map
, and filter
methods run from start to finish until all of the elements of the array are processed. There is no way of stopping of breaking out of the loop, once a particular element is found.
In such cases, we can use the array some
method. The map
, forEach
and some
method takes the same parameters in the callback function:
- The first parameter is the actual value
- The second parameter is the index
- The third parameter is the original array
The some
method stops looping through the array once it finds a particular match as can be seen in the above example 1.
Advantages of using the some method
- It allows us to quickly check if some of the elements match certain criteria without writing a lot of code
- It allows us to quickly break out of the loop, which was not possible with other looping methods seen above
Browser Support:
- All modern browsers and Internet Explorer (IE) version 9 and above
- Microsoft Edge version 12 and above
The Array.reduce Method
The Array.reduce
method has the following syntax:
Array.reduce(callback(accumulator, currentValue[, index[, array]])[, initialValue])
The reduce
method executes a reducer
function (that you provide) on each element of the array, resulting in a single output value.
Note that the output of the
reduce
method is always a single value. It can be an object, a number, a string, an array, and so on. It depends on what you want the output of thereduce
method to generate but it's always a single value.
Suppose that you want to find the sum of all the numbers in the array. You can use the reduce
method for that.
const numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
const sum = numbers.reduce(function(accumulator, number) {
return accumulator + number;
}, 0);
console.log(sum); // 15
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
The reduce
method accepts a callback function that receives accumulator
, number
, index
and array
as the values. In the above code, we’re using only accumulator
and number
.
The accumulator
will contain the initialValue to be used for the array. The initialValue
decides the return type of the data returned by the reduce
method.
The number
is the second parameter to the callback function that will contain the array element during each iteration of the loop.
In the above code, we have provided 0
as the initialValue
for the accumulator
. So the first time the callback function executes, the accumulator + number
will be 0 + 1 = 1
and we're returning back the value 1
.
The next time the callback function runs, accumulator + number
will be 1 + 2 = 3
(1
here is the previous value returned in the last iteration and 2
is the next element from the array).
Then, the next time the callback function runs, accumulator + number
will be
3 + 3 = 6
(the first 3
here is the previous value returned in the last iteration and the next 3
is the next element from the array) and it will continue this way until all the elements in the numbers array are not iterated.
So the accumulator
will retain the value of the last operation just like a static variable.
In the above code, initialValue
of 0
is not required because all the elements of the array are integers.
So the below code will also work:
const numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
const sum = numbers.reduce(function (accumulator, number) {
return accumulator + number;
});
console.log(sum); // 15
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Here, the accumulator
will contain the first element of the array and number
will contain the next element of the array ( 1 + 2 = 3
during the first iteration and then 3 + 3 = 6
during the next iteration, and so on).
But it’s always good to specify the initialValue
of accumulator
as it makes it easy to understand the return type of the reduce
method and get the correct type of data back.
Take a look at the below code:
const numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
const doublesSum = numbers.reduce(function (accumulator, number) {
return accumulator + number * 2;
}, 10);
console.log(doublesSum); // 40
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Here, we’re multiplying each element of the array by 2. We have provided an initialValue
of 10 to the accumulator so 10
will be added to the final result of the sum like this:
[1 * 2, 2 * 2, 3 * 2, 4 * 2, 5 * 2] = [2, 4, 6, 8, 10] = 30 + 10 = 40
Suppose, you have an array of objects with x and y coordinates and you want to get the sum of x coordinates. You can use the reduce
method for that.
const coordinates = [
{ x: 1, y: 2 },
{ x: 2, y: 3 },
{ x: 3, y: 4 }
];
const sum = coordinates.reduce(function (accumulator, currentValue) {
return accumulator + currentValue.x;
}, 0);
console.log(sum); // 6
Here's a Code Pen Demo.
Advantages of using the reduce method
- Using
reduce
allows us to generate any type of simple or complex data based on the array - It remembers the previously returns data from the loop so helps us avoid creating a global variable to store the previous value
Browser Support:
- All modern browsers and Internet Explorer (IE) version 9 and above
- Microsoft Edge version 12 and above
Thanks for reading!
Want to learn all ES6+ features in detail including let and const, promises, various promise methods, array and object destructuring, arrow functions, async/await, import and export and a whole lot more?
Check out my Mastering Modern JavaScript book. This book covers all the pre-requisites for learning React and helps you to become better at JavaScript and React.
Also, check out my free Introduction to React Router course to learn React Router from scratch.
Want to stay up to date with regular content regarding JavaScript, React, Node.js? Follow me on LinkedIn.
Top comments (9)
There is another syntax that let you iterate over the elements of an array :
I like the functional programming style but sometime it is good to be able to break the loop earlier.
That's true but
for...of
loop is very slow compared to normal for loop and forEach loop. So it should not be used when the performance matters.It's true that
for...of
loop are slower, but not very slow compared tofor
loop. I think this cost is due to the fact thatfor...of
loop work not only for arrays but for iterators.Yeah, maybe. Here is a detailed analysis of the performance for all of them which is worth checking out
Interesting performance comparison. It's unfortunate that in the traditional for loop they did not include assigning arr[i] to a variable since that's inherently part of the other two cases.
I think these may be a bit off. I did a quick test using jsbench.me, with for...i as the baseline fastest: for...of 5% slower, forEach being 35% slower, and map being 45% slower. Note that run to run one may perform faster depending on what the compiler decides to optimize, which means you need to measure many runs and aggregate.
These results also make sense given the difference in how many memory allocations and references have to be made. For...i requires very little in the way of allocations, for of requires an allocation of the value variable, both forEach and map require the allocation of the function reference and the variable. If map or forEach are ever faster than for...i or for...of then it is a specific optimization on that version of the compiler and will likely fall behind once the compiler devs optimize for...i and for...of again.
I agree with you, It may depend on compiler optimization. Thanks for the detailed analysis👍
I almost never want to unconditionally visit every item in an array. forEach() takes away
break
,continue
, andreturn
. I almost always want to use these inside the loop. They're 10x more useful than forEach(). In fact I avoid forEach() even when I don't needbreak
,continue
, andreturn
, just in case I need them later. I'll stick withfor
, butmap
,reduce
,find
,filter
are all extremely useful. I wish they were inSet
too.That's true. except
forEach
, all other methods are really useful.forEach
is not used much but knowing how to use all of them is good to know.Thanks for your point of view regarding it 🙂