Yes, I already have a series of abi_ types, so abi_byte makes sense. But C-integration is only part of the story, there are still some low-level cases that require the same concept as a byte. Those are quite low level though, so still ABI relevant. Perhaps just an abi_byte isn't a bad compromise.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Yes, I already have a series of
abi_types, soabi_bytemakes sense. But C-integration is only part of the story, there are still some low-level cases that require the same concept as abyte. Those are quite low level though, so still ABI relevant. Perhaps just anabi_byteisn't a bad compromise.