Problem statement
A bracket is considered to be any one of the following characters: (
, )
, {
, }
, [
, or ]
.
Two brackets are considered to be a matched pair if the an opening bracket (i.e., (
, [
, or {
) occurs to the left of a closing bracket (i.e., )
, ]
, or }
) of the exact same type. There are three types of matched pairs of brackets: []
, {}
, and ()
.
A matching pair of brackets is not balanced if the set of brackets it encloses are not matched. For example, {[(])}
is not balanced because the contents in between {
and }
are not balanced. The pair of square brackets encloses a single, unbalanced opening bracket, (
, and the pair of parentheses encloses a single, unbalanced closing square bracket, ]
.
By this logic, we say a sequence of brackets is balanced if the following conditions are met:
- It contains no unmatched brackets.
- The subset of brackets enclosed within the confines of a matched pair of brackets is also a matched pair of brackets.
Given n strings of brackets, determine whether each sequence of brackets is balanced. If a string is balanced, return YES
. Otherwise, return NO
.
Function Description
Complete the function isBalanced in the editor below.
isBalanced has the following parameter(s):
- string s: a string of brackets
Returns
- string: either
YES
orNO
Input Format
The first line contains a single integer n, the number of strings.
Each of the next n lines contains a single string s, a sequence of brackets.
Constraints
- 1 ≤ n ≤ 10³
- 1 ≤ |s| ≤ 10³
- All chracters in the sequences ∈ { {, }, (, ), [, ] }.
Output Format
For each string, return YES
or NO
.
Sample Input
STDIN Function
----- --------
3 n = 3
{[()]} first s = '{[()]}'
{[(])} second s = '{[(])}'
{{[[(())]]}} third s ='{{[[(())]]}}'
Sample Output
YES
NO
YES
Explanation
- The string
{[()]}
meets both criteria for being a balanced string. - The string
{[(])}
is not balanced because the brackets enclosed by the matched pair{
and}
are not balanced:[(])
. - The string
{{[[(())]]}}
meets both criteria for being a balanced string.
Solution
This is a quite popular problem in data structures. Considering the closing bracket should match the last opened bracket, we always need to know the last added opening bracket. Thus, we can use stack! However, C does not provide one, unlike C++. Instead, we can simulate it with an array and pointer (or index) at the top of the stack. Notice: the stack pointer points to the top element, not the next "empty" slot, thus, we start at -1, as there are no items in the stack initially.
char* isBalanced(char* s) {
char *stack = calloc(strlen(s), sizeof(char));
int top = -1; // index of the top of the "stack"
...
}
So, we just need to store opening brackets, and pop them (or move the stack pointer) when the relative closing bracket comes as the next symbol:
char* isBalanced(char* s) {
char *stack = calloc(strlen(s), sizeof(char));
int top = -1; // index of the top of the "stack"
while(*s)
{
if (*s == '(' || *s == '{' || *s == '[') // opening bracket, just add to stack
stack[++top] = *s++; // move stack pointer and get next string character
}
...
}
Now, we just need to pop items from the stack if a matching closing bracket is spotted. Also, we need to consider if a closing bracket comes when the stack is empty:
char* isBalanced(char* s) {
char *stack = calloc(strlen(s), sizeof(char));
int top = -1; // index of the top of the "stack"
while(*s)
{
if (*s == '(' || *s == '{' || *s == '[') // opening bracket, just add to stack
stack[++top] = *s++; // move stack pointer and get next string character
else // it is a closing bracket
if (top != -1 && ((*s == ')' && stack[top] == '(') ||
(*s == '}' && stack[top] == '{') ||
(*s == ']' && stack[top] == '[')))
--top, ++s; // "pop" element
else
break;
}
...
}
Instead of having that many "and"s and "or"s, we can use a little "magic". If we look at ascii table (numbers are in decimal):
-
(
is 40,)
is 41 -
[
is 91,]
is 93 -
{
is 123,}
is 125
The difference between these closing brackets is either 1 or 2! So, we can do simple if:
char* isBalanced(char* s) {
char *stack = calloc(strlen(s), sizeof(char));
int top = -1; // index of the top of the "stack"
while(*s)
{
if (*s == '(' || *s == '{' || *s == '[') // opening bracket, just add to stack
stack[++top] = *s++; // move stack pointer and get next string character
else // it is a closing bracket
if (top != -1 && ((*s - stack[top]) == 1 || (*s - stack[top] == 2))) // distance between opening/closing brackets are 1,2,2
--top, ++s;
else
break;
}
...
}
If the difference is not 1 or 2, we simply abort the loop. At the end, we just want to make sure that our stack is empty and that we processed all characters in s
(and of course, we must free calloc-ed stack
variable). So, the full code:
char* isBalanced(char* s) {
char *stack = calloc(strlen(s), sizeof(char));
int top = -1; // index of the top of the "stack"
while(*s)
{
if (*s == '(' || *s == '{' || *s == '[') // opening bracket, just add to stack
stack[++top] = *s++; // move stack pointer and get next string character
else // it is closing bracket
if (top != -1 && ((*s - stack[top]) == 1 || (*s - stack[top] == 2))) // distance between opening/closing brackets are 1,2,2
--top, ++s;
else
break;
}
free(stack);
// return yes, if stack is empty, i.e. all opening brackets are closed
// and iterated through whole string without interruption
return (*s == 0 && top == -1) ? "YES" : "NO";
}
If we submit:
If we do this in C++, the logic would be exactly the same, but by using the stack
data structure, provided by C++:
string isBalanced(string s) {
stack<char> st;
int i = 0;
for (; i < s.length(); ++i)
{
if (s.at(i) == '(' || s.at(i) == '{' || s.at(i) == '[') // opening bracket, just add to stack
st.push(s.at(i)); // add bracket to stack
else // it is closing bracket
if (!st.empty() && (abs(s.at(i) - st.top()) <= 2)) // distance between opening/closing brackets are 1,2,2
st.pop(); // remove opened bracket from stack
else
break;
}
// return yes, if the stack is empty, i.e. all opening brackets are closed
// and iterated through whole string without interruption
return (i >= s.length() && st.empty()) ? "YES" : "NO";
}
Perfect, it works! Yay! You can find solutions here. Feel free to contribute your solution in a different language!
Top comments (0)