For many years, NVIDIA has maintained its position as the leading maker of graphics cards. You may be familiar with the names of their two most well-known GPUs, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is a fantastic low TDP graphics card that can play the majority of games at 1080p without any lag, but how does its performance compare to that of NVIDIA's most recent NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050? How big of a performance difference can you see between the most recent RTX series and the most recent GTX series? Let's discuss with MedCPU about "GTX 1650 vs RTX 3050 reviews 2023: What VGA is best for gaming laptops?"
Overview of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Before switching to the RTX moniker, NVIDIA introduced its final GTX lineup of graphics cards in April 2019. The GeForce GTX 16 generation, which preceded the GeForce RTX 20 series, was given that name. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 stands out in this series thanks to its low TDP of just 75 W, which enables it to run the majority of AAA games at 60 FPS at 1080p resolution.
The 12nm technology used in the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650's construction is based on the Turing architecture. A typical 128-bit memory interface and 4GB of GDDR5 memory are included. Additionally, it features a 1485 MHz base GPU core clock that can be pushed to 1665 MHz. The device supports 4700 million transistors and has a 200mm2 di area and 12nm process.
OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.3, and CUDA 7.5 are further graphic enhancements. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is also a dual-slot graphics card, but it can take all the power it requires from the motherboard's PCIe x16 slot and doesn't need any more power. For smaller gaming systems, NVIDIA has also created a low-profile version of it.
896 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units make up the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. Additionally, it includes a 1MB L2 Cache and a 64KB L1 Cache. It was introduced with a 149 USD price tag and is now being produced and sold in the market. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 continues to provide outstanding performance in all contemporary games even though NVIDIA has retired the GTX series of GPUs, and it will continue to do so for a very long time.
Read more: https://www.nvidia.com/en-eu/geforce/gaming-laptops/gtx-1650/
Overview of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 is one of the most current graphics cards to come out of NVIDIA in recent memory. It was introduced earlier this year in January 2022. In terms of game performance, it provides respectable results. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 128-bit memory interface. It is constructed using the most recent Ampere architecture. It supports 12,000,000,000 transistors on a device with a 276 mm2 and 8nm size. The core clock speed of the GPU is 1552 MHz as standard and 1777 MHz when overclocked.
The RTX 30 series, which is NVIDIA's most recent generation of GPUs, is the follow-up to the RTX 20 series. If you want to run games smoothly with raytracing and DLSS, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 is the ideal graphics card to purchase. It is outstanding, affordable, and uses less power than other GeForce 30 series graphics cards.
In terms of visuals, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 supports DirectX 12 (12_2), allowing it to run all current and forthcoming games. Additionally, it supports CUDA 8.6, Vulkan 1.3, and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 contains 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units in terms of rendering setup. Along with a 2MB L2 Cache, it also contains a 128KB L1 Cache. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, a dual-slot card type, needs a strong PSU to support its 130 W-rated TDP. One 8-pin power connector connected to the PCIe x16 slot serves as its power source.
Read more: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/graphics-cards/30-series/rtx-3050/
GTX 1650 vs RTX 3050: Gaming Benchmarks
Now, we will compare the RTX 3050 vs GTX 1650 in a variety of games to see how big of a performance difference there is. We will then know the GTX 1650 vs RTX 3050 - which is better?
Test PC
CPU: Core i9-12900K
Motherboard: MSI MPG Z690 Force
RAM: 32Gb RAM DDR5 5200Mhz
CPU Cooler: NZXT Kraken Z Series Z73
GPU: GeForce GTX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 4GB / GeForce RTX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
SSD: 2 x SAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB
Power Supply: CORSAIR RM850i 850W
Days Gone
We begin the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX 3050 comparison with the acclaimed third-person zombie game Days Gone. This game has been benchmarked at 1080p resolution on the maximum settings, much like the other titles on the list.
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 achieved an average frame rate of 58 FPS for the Days Gone benchmark, compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050's 106. This indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 had nearly double the performance of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and was 45% quicker at rendering frames.
The lowest 1% frame rate decreases were recorded at 49 frames per second for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and 89 frames per second for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, indicating that even the lowest frame rate drops for the latter were greater than the average frame rate of the former. Additionally, in the case of 0.1% lows, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 dropped to 47 FPS as contrasted to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, which dropped to 84 FPS.
Cyberpunk 2077
The most demanding settings for both GPUs were tested on the 1080p resolution of the massive futuristic open-world game Cyberpunk 2077. Even yet, the game requires a lot of GPU and CPU power, thus frame rates will be substantially lower than in the other titles on our list.
When compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, which was averaging 70 FPS in the Cyberpunk 2077 benchmark, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 could only manage an average frame rate of 37. With that stated, we can claim that in Cyberpunk 2077, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 had an average frame rate that was 48% greater than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650's.
We can see that even the 1% low FPS dips for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 are higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650's average FPS, which plummeted to 30 FPS from 58 FPS. In addition, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 saw the lowest 0.1% FPS losses, dropping to 28 FPS, as opposed to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, which dropped to 51 FPS.
God of War
A highly regarded action-adventure game is God of War. The game was put through rigorous testing using both graphic cards at their maximum settings in 1080p resolution.
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 was capable of an average frame rate of 44 FPS on the God of War benchmark. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 was operating at an average frame rate of 82. That's approximately two times as many frames in the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050's advantage. Having said that, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 produced frames 47% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650.
Additionally, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 lowers to 37 FPS according to the 1% FPS dips, whereas the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 maintains a frame rate of 67 FPS. A similar outcome is also demonstrated by the 0.1% FPS decreases, with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 decreasing to 35 FPS while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 maintained 44 FPS.
Dying Light 2
Dying Light 2, one of the greatest first-person survival games, was evaluated using the engine's top settings at 1080p resolution. Dying Light 2 uses more CPU power than the other games on the list, therefore the FPS difference between the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 is less noticeable.
The benchmark shows that the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 was averaging 37 frames per second while the 3050 was 20 frames faster at 57 frames per second. Although the gap was lower than in some other benchmarks on this list, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 was 36% quicker at producing frames than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650.
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 plummeted to 30 FPS for the 1% lowest FPS losses, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 dropped to 47 FPS. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 was reduced to 16 FPS due to the 0.1% FPS reductions, whilst the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 was reduced to 18 FPS.
PUBG
A recently released free-to-play battle royale game is called PUBG. PUBG has also been tested at 1080p resolution with the maximum settings, much like the other titles on the list
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 achieved an average frame rate of 69 FPS for the PUBG benchmark, compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050's 116. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 rendered frames 41% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650.
The lowest 1% FPS drops were noted at 46 FPS for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and 72 FPS for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, which means that once again, even the lowest FPS drops of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 were higher than the average frame rate of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. Furthermore, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 fell down to 45 FPS in case of 0.1% lows, as opposed to NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, which went down to 38 FPS.
Forza Horizon 5
The Forza Horizon 5 benchmark is used to compare the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs 3050 graphics cards. One of the finest racing games to ever be released, Forza Horizon 5 offers stunning visuals.
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 achieved an average frame rate of 86 FPS in the Forza Horizon 5 benchmark as opposed to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050's 136 FPS. Therefore, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 lagged well behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, which had an FPS output that was 17% higher.
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 saw the lowest 1% FPS reductions, falling to 79 FPS, as opposed to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, which experienced a dip to 121 FPS. Similar to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 achieved a lower frame rate of 75 FPS for 0.1% lows.
Hitman 3
The recently launched stealth game Hitman 3 was tested on both GPUs at the top settings at 1080p resolution. Additionally, compared to earlier entries, the game is less CPU-heavy than prior entries, therefore the difference in FPS is more noticeable here than in the other titles on this list.
When compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, which was achieving 114 FPS in the Hitman 3 benchmark, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 could only manage an average frame rate of 63 FPS. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 provided an average frame rate in Cyberpunk 2077 that was 45% greater than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650.
We can see that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 is higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650's average FPS when comparing the lowest 1% FPS drops, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 plummeted to 51 FPS compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050's 92 FPS In addition, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 saw the lowest 0.1% FPS losses, dropping to 49 FPS, as opposed to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, which dropped to 79 FPS.
Horizon Zero Dawn
Action role-playing game Horizon Zero Dawn has received a 9.3/10 rating from IGN and a 9/10 rating from Steam. When testing Horizon Zero Dawn, both graphic cards were set to their utmost 1080p resolution.
The Horizon Zero Dawn benchmark showed the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 averaging 45 frames per second. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 was operating at an average frame rate of 78. In comparison to other games examined on this list, that difference is far more significant.
Additionally, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 lowers to 38 FPS according to the 1% FPS reductions, whereas the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 maintains 68 FPS. In the end, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 continues to lead by a wide margin and maintains a higher average frame rate than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. A similar outcome is also demonstrated by the 0.1% FPS decreases, with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 decreasing to 37 FPS while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 maintained 62 FPS.
Red Dead Redemption 2
One of the greatest open-world action games is Red Dead Redemption, which was tested at 1080p resolution using the system's maximum settings. Red Dead Redemption 2 also uses greater GPU resources in the majority of the map's locations. Towns with more NPCs, however, demand more processing power.
The benchmark shows that the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 was averaging 32 frames per second while the 3050 was outperforming it by 34 frames at 66 frames per second. When it comes to producing frames, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 was 49% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, making it almost twice as fast.
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 plummeted to 28 FPS for the 1% lowest FPS losses, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 dropped to 59 FPS. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650's frame rate was reduced by 0.1% to 27 FPS, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050's was reduced to 38 FPS.
Microsoft Flight Simulator
The Microsoft Flight Simulator test was used to compare the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 cards at their maximum settings in 1080p resolution. The game requires a strong GPU to support the FPS and is fewer CPU-intensive than the other titles on this list.
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 achieved an average frame rate of 41 FPS in the Microsoft Flight Simulator benchmark, whereas the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 achieved a frame rate of 77 FPS. Therefore, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 lagged well behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, which produced 47% more average frames per second.
In terms of the lowest 1% FPS decreases, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 decreased to 34 FPS, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 dropped to 55 FPS. Similarly, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 achieved a lower frame rate of 32 FPS at 0.1% lows, compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050's 48 FPS.
Results of actual game testing
Test results for games in full HD (1920x1080)
All of the games in the test are set to Ultra Quality, which is the maximum setting available in games. Because different brands of graphics cards have variable TDP (power consumption), test results may change by 10% from reality.
Game RTX 3050 GTX 1650
Valorant 177.1 FPS 80.6 FPS
League of Legends 518 FPS 222.7 FPS
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 275.8 FPS 99.1 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V 86.1 FPS 33 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40.6 FPS 18.4 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077 40.6 FPS 18.4 FPS
When two VGAs are capable of achieving more than 200 FPS with excellent display graphics, the light game League of Legends does not appear to be a significant obstacle for them. The GTX 1650 may be a little "slower" than its successor generation when it comes to FPS games, but it still allows for stable and fluid gameplay.
Furthermore, while playing games like GTA-V, Assassin's Creed Valhalla, and Cyberpunk 2077, which demand high setup on VGA and whose FPS is 35 or less, too low compared to typical requirements, GTX graphics cards will struggle to please players. You may play with the lowest setup level if you still want to, but it will be challenging to have the greatest gaming experience in this way.
Test results for games in 2K (2560x1440)
Game RTX 3050 GTX 1650
Valorant 144.9 FPS 65.9 FPS
League of Legends 282.8 FPS 123.7 FPS
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 226.1 FPS 83.3 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V 62.3 FPS 22.9 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35 FPS 16 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077 37.8 FPS 17.2 FPS
When we compare them at a higher resolution, we can observe the difference between these two graphics cards. At the maximum configuration levels, light games will still be simple to play, with in-game motions remaining fluid and projected pictures retaining clarity, delivering the finest game experience.
Higher resolutions will necessitate greater use of the graphics card's capabilities. Perhaps the GTX 1650 can only handle games that don't demand a lot of VGA. The RTX 3050, on the other hand, provides typical play with an FPS greater than 30 for games like Assassin's Creed Valhalla or Cyberpunk 2077, but will still encounter latency during the climax.
Conclusion
It is abundantly evident from this GPU comparison of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 that there is a significant difference in FPS between the two cards. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 had nearly twice as many frames per second as the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 in the majority of games that were evaluated. Before purchasing one of these GPUs, there are a few things you should keep in mind.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 is a considerably more modern graphics card with additional software support and newer technologies like raytracing and DLSS. In addition, it performs significantly better than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 since it has more VRAM and quicker core clocks. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 also outperformed the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 by 40–45% in every game that was evaluated. While gaming, the two GPUs both ran at comparable temperatures.
The GeForce RTX 3050 is unquestionably the greatest GeForce xx50 series card produced by NVIDIA to date. It costs significantly more than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and uses more power. Choose the GPU that won't slow down the rest of your system if you want to update.
MedCPU hopes that the article “Gtx 1650 vs Rtx 3050 Reviews 2022: What VGA is best for gaming laptops?” is helpful for you.
Read also:
GTX 1050 Ti vs GTX 1060: Which Card Should I Get? (2022)
RTX 2060 vs GTX 1070: Which One Is Best (2022)
Top comments (0)