DEV Community

Building scalable robusts and type safe forms with Angular

Maxime on June 16, 2019

Hi there 👋! Today I'd like to share some of my experience in building (what I think are) large and complex forms with Angular. One thing to keep i...

Read full post

AndrewTraub • Jul 26 '19

I'm using angular 7 and so installed version 2.7.1 but my compiler is showing all kinds of problems with it - like DataInput and NgxRootFormComponent aren't in ngx-sub-form. Will the latest version work with angular 7?

Maxime • Jul 27 '19

Hi Andrew,

Angular 7 support ended after 2.7.1 I'm afraid!

DataInput landed in v2.9.0 github.com/cloudnc/ngx-sub-form/re...

AndrewTraub • Jul 28 '19

So do you have sample code that works with 2.7.1 or do I need to upgrade to angular 8 in order to get my code working?

Thanks,

Andrew

Maxime • Jul 28 '19

You can clone the project:

git clone git@github.com:cloudnc/ngx-sub-form.git

and checkout the latest version working with angular 7

git checkout v2.7.1

From there you'll have the README and the whole demo project working with Angular 7.

If you want to use new features that appeared after 2.7.1 or take advantage of the latest bug fixes you'll have to upgrade to Angular 8 and then use the latest of ngx-sub-form.

Hope it makes sense.
If you can and there's no particular blocker, I'd recommend upgrading to Angular 8 anyway :)

AndrewTraub • Jul 29 '19

Thanks. Is there any way to add a custom validation for the entire group? Normally, I'd do so like this:

createFormGroup() {
this.myForm = this.fb.group({
mobile : new FormControl(''),
homePhone : new FormControl('')
// our custom validator
}, { validator: this.atLeastOnePhoneRequired});
}

but in the form using ngx-sub-form I'm using code like this:
protected getFormControls(): Controls {
return {
mobile : new FormControl(null),
homePhone : new FormControl(null)
};
}

Maxime • Jul 29 '19

Yes, there's definitely a way to do that.

Search getFormGroupControlOptions on the README :)

cesar jacquet • Aug 30 '19

Hi Maxime, thank you for that very nice lib and tutorial.

Just a stupid question, i have to make "checkbox-group" for a project, that work exactly like a "select" with multivalues accepted. What is the best method to do that with ngx-sub-form ?
We need that, just because my customer prefer the look of a checkbox group than a "select" dropdown on phone.
In fact i would love to have a component like "radiogroup" or "select" that directly display a checkbox group. To do that, is it better to create as a sub-form of my main form for each "checkbox-group" or create a specific "widget" just for that ?

Maxime • Aug 31 '19

Hi Cesar, thanks for the kind words.

There is no stupid question :)!
Can you please open an issue here github.com/cloudnc/ngx-sub-form/is... so that other people wondering the same thing might find it easily?

Thanks

cesar jacquet • Aug 31 '19

Ok, i va added the question to your github page.

Thanks

Anthony Akpan • Jun 16 '19

Unless I'm missing something here, how is this diffrent from the native angular form builder?

Dont quote me on this but I'm sorta sure that one can build complex forms in a child parent manner using just the form builder.

Generate the form in the root component and pass individual form groups, form arrays to the sub components

Maxime • Jun 16 '19 • Edited

Hi Antony,

yes ngx-sub-forms is different than what you can do with FormBuilder.

FormBuilder is a simple helper to save you some boilerplate instead of using directly new FormGroup().

If you refer to breaking-down-the-form-into-sub-co... and breaking-down-the-form-into-sub-co..., I've explained why using a ControlValueAccessor instead of passing a FormGroup (or FormArray, FormControl, etc) is a better idea.

But ngx-sub-form is also going further than that:

Type safety (within .ts and .html)
Helpers (see what-raw-ngxsubform-endraw-has-to-...) including for example the retrieval of errors from a parent with nested ones too, that is not possible with form groups
Gives you methods, to have for a given form a different internal structure which is important for dealing with polymorphic data

It feels like I'm quoting myself from the article without adding much in this comment so not sure how helpful this will be to you... Let me know if you're still not convinced :). Maybe you can make a demo on stackblitz using inputs to pass a formGroup and I can fork your demo to show you the difference with ngx-sub-form 👍

Oh and I almost forgot, but using a ControlValueAccessor you let people decide whether they want to use a template form or a reactive one. So you could build a sub component with ngx-sub-form in a reactive way, and consume it as part of another form with a template syntax for example. Which is not the case when you pass a formGroup

m12lrpv • Aug 4 '20

12 months on and this plugin is fantastic but i'm struggling to use it in one aspect. One to many master detail forms.

Is there a working example similar to the suggestion of adding multiple colours to your spaceship example or the Authors example mentioned in github.com/cloudnc/ngx-sub-form/is...

m12lrpv • Aug 5 '20

I later realised that you're demo app had the functionality. I've forked your simplified demo to include the FormArray functionality
stackblitz.com/edit/ngx-sub-form-b...

Elvis P dos Reis • Oct 9 '20

following the example
stackblitz.com/edit/ngx-sub-form-b...
I need to put all the controls inside a single component in the "FormArray", however I didn't understand how to access the "compartment.formControlNames.deck"

Maxime • Oct 9 '20

Hi Elvis, I think all you need to do is change FormControlName for deck and size to a simple FormControl to witch you'd pass the compartment.

If you provide a minimal repro on stackblitz I may help you out

Thanh Phan • Jun 17 '19 • Edited

Thanks, I really appreciate advanced Angular posts like this. ReactiveForm is useful but I feel like working with form in Angular can be better than what we're having.

Maxime • Jun 17 '19

Thanks, I really appreciate advanced Angular posts like this

Hi Thanh! Thanks for the kind words.

I agree, feels like reactive forms could go further than what they currently do. In the meantime, let's improve them as much as we can ourselves!

Lars Rye Jeppesen • Jul 2 '19

Wow awesome

Maxime • Jul 2 '19

Thanks Lars! =)

fredsteffen • Dec 9 '19

Excellent article and a great solution to a tricky problem. Thanks for posting!

Maxime • Dec 9 '19

Glad you liked it, thanks for letting me know :)

Austin Shoecraft • Jun 18 '19

As someone who has endured the battle of Reactive Forms, this is looking really good. Curious to your opinions to ngrx-forms. It's not the easiest to get started, but I've really liked the integration an the functional aspect of it.

Maxime • Jun 19 '19

As someone who has endured the battle of Reactive Forms, this is looking really good

I appreciate that :)! Hopefully it might help you a bit in the future.

Curious to your opinions to ngrx-forms

I've never used it yet and don't have time to dive into their doc right now so can't make any comment about it.

mthood • Jan 14 '20 • Edited

i'l suggest also this:

davembush.github.io/attaching-an-a...

It's not type safe solution, but really, really smart.
thank's for your great job

Костя Третяк • Aug 15 '20 • Edited

Every Subscription that returns from .subscribe() need call .unsubscribe() in the OnDestroy() method. Exceptions to this rule are provided only for HttpClient.

Elvis P dos Reis • Oct 16 '20

I need to interact all the elements of the FormGroup but they are all the same type in the subform
github issue