DEV Community

Cover image for Streamlined Development: Asynchronous Reviews for Incremental Changes
Insight Lighthouse
Insight Lighthouse

Posted on

Streamlined Development: Asynchronous Reviews for Incremental Changes

🤖 Disclaimer: This content is the product of a harmonious collaboration between human creativity and AI's analytical prowess.

Ever felt bogged down by traditional code reviews that seem to drag on forever? Imagine a development process where asynchronous feedback and incremental changes come together, paving the way for agility and efficiency. Dive into this guide to discover a fresh approach that redefines the boundaries of code collaboration and deployment.

1. Branch Off the Main

  • Purpose: Ensure the main branch remains stable.
  • Action: Developers create a branch from the main for each new task.

2. Focus on Small, Incremental Changes

  • Purpose: Simplify code integration and review.
  • Action: Implement a basic test and corresponding code to pass it.

3. Push the Branch

  • Purpose: Start the CI/CD process.
  • Action: Push the branch to the remote repository.

4. Initiate Automated Checks

  • Purpose: Maintain code quality.
  • Action: On push, the CI/CD system, e.g., GitHub Actions, triggers checks on altered lines/files.

5. Conditional Automatic Merging

  • Purpose: Speed up code integration.
  • Action: If tests pass, the system auto-merges the branch into the main.

6. Deployment Block with Implicit Dual Review

  • Purpose: Use comments as a gate to ensure human-reviewed quality.
  • Action: Anyone can comment or address comments. However, for deployment to proceed, every comment must be marked as resolved. A non-author must leave a comment and a different non-author must mark it as resolved.

7. Release to Production

  • Purpose: Deliver quality code to end-users.
  • Action: After comments are resolved, the CI/CD system deploys changes to production.

Conclusion

In a tech landscape that often prioritizes speed, the methodology presented here champions a balance. It underscores the essential interplay between automated processes and the irreplaceable touch of human oversight through a dual-reviewer system. This strategy is more than just efficient development; it's about upholding quality, fostering collaboration, and ensuring that every piece of code is a testament to excellence. While there might be challenges in fully realizing this approach, its transformative potential for software development practices is profound. As you reflect on these insights, consider: how might they reshape your own development workflows?

Top comments (0)