I have a small sceptical about the Small Web. I was reading the whole article twice to get a better picture of it. It starts by comparing the difference between the big tech companies like Facebook and Google monopolizing users data with how Small Web is not.
In the middle, it put strong words and blame the decentralized technologies is not as good as the Small Web and the architecture of decentralized is some sort of fake.
At the end of the article, it promotes their web hosting solutions. But from my understanding, Small Web just like any Netlify or Digital Ocean or even close to the traditional web hosting company with special marketing and packaging. The marketing elements for such a diversion should be dev tools and articles.
Users could never know if their data been used by the Small Web. Since the data is not hosted by users itself with their machine, such as using the decentralized technologies for example.
But, frankly, the Small Web product is nothing wrong. It just another product that highly polished with marketing strategies.
I just like the "small web" term, and I think that not all the article content is great (but a big part is).
When I say "small web", I think about websites built to be fast, with optimized images, no javascript (or just small scripts made to make navigation easier), no ad tracker, and a small handcrafted html/css interface.
Maybe I should write "small websites" in the post?
It is because you added the link Small Web in the post content, assuming people might want to read it that could be related to it. And then, when people came back to your post, both contents are a little different meaning. I hate to say the word (misleading), but, it's alright.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I have a small sceptical about the
Small Web. I was reading the whole article twice to get a better picture of it. It starts by comparing the difference between the big tech companies like Facebook and Google monopolizing users data with howSmall Webis not.In the middle, it put strong words and blame the decentralized technologies is not as good as the
Small Weband the architecture of decentralized is some sort of fake.At the end of the article, it promotes their web hosting solutions. But from my understanding,
Small Webjust like any Netlify or Digital Ocean or even close to the traditional web hosting company with special marketing and packaging. The marketing elements for such a diversion should be dev tools and articles.Users could never know if their data been used by the
Small Web. Since the data is not hosted by users itself with their machine, such as using the decentralized technologies for example.But, frankly, the
Small Webproduct is nothing wrong. It just another product that highly polished with marketing strategies.I just like the "small web" term, and I think that not all the article content is great (but a big part is).
When I say "small web", I think about websites built to be fast, with optimized images, no javascript (or just small scripts made to make navigation easier), no ad tracker, and a small handcrafted html/css interface.
Maybe I should write "small websites" in the post?
It is because you added the link Small Web in the post content, assuming people might want to read it that could be related to it. And then, when people came back to your post, both contents are a little different meaning. I hate to say the word (misleading), but, it's alright.