Zip files on S3 with AWS Lambda and Node

#aws #lambda #s3 #zip

Gordon Johnston Sep 11, 2019 ・Updated on Oct 5, 2019 ・3 min read

It's not an uncommon requirement to want to package files on S3 into a Zip file for a user to download multiple files in a single package. Maybe it's common enough for AWS to offer this functionality themselves one day. Until then you can write a short script to do it.

If you want to provide this service in a serverless environment such as AWS Lambda you have two main constraints that define the approach you can take.

1 - /tmp is only 512Mb. Your first idea might be to download the files from S3, zip them up, upload the result. This will work fine until you fill up /tmp with the temporary files!

2 - Memory is constrained to 3GB. You could store the temporary files on the heap, but again you are constrained to 3GB. Even in a regular server environment you're not going to want a simple zip function to take 3GB of RAM!

So what can you do? The answer is to stream the data from S3, through an archiver and back onto S3.

Fortunately this Stack Overflow post and its comments pointed the way and this post is basically a rehash of it!

The below code is Typescript but the Javascript is just the same with the types removed.

Start with the imports you need

import * as Archiver from 'archiver';
import * as AWS from 'aws-sdk';
import { createReadStream } from 'fs';
import { Readable, Stream } from 'stream';

Let's start by creating the streams to fetch the data from S3. Let's assume you have a list of keys in keys. For each key we need to create a ReadStream. To track the keys and streams lets create a S3DownloadStreamDetails type. The 'filename' will ultimately be the filename in the Zip, so you can do any transformation you need for that at this stage.

    type S3DownloadStreamDetails = { stream: Readable; filename: string };

Now for our array of keys, we can iterate after it to create the S3StreamDetails objects

    const s3DownloadStreams: S3DownloadStreamDetails[] = keys.map((key: string) => {
        return {
            stream: s3.getObject({ Bucket: 'Bucket Name', Key: key }).createReadStream(),
            filename: key,
        };
    });

Now prepare the upload side by creating a Stream.PassThrough object and assigning that as the Body of the params for a S3.PutObjectRequest.


    const streamPassThrough = new Stream.PassThrough();
    const params: AWS.S3.PutObjectRequest = {
        ACL: 'private',
        Body: streamPassThrough
        Bucket: 'Bucket Name',
        ContentType: 'application/zip',
        Key: 'The Key on S3',
        StorageClass: 'STANDARD_IA', // Or as appropriate
    };

Now we can start the upload process.

    const s3Upload = s3.upload(params, (error: Error): void => {
        if (error) {
            console.error(`Got error creating stream to s3 ${error.name} ${error.message} ${error.stack}`);
            throw error;
        }
    });

If you want to monitor the upload process, for example to give feedback to users then you can attach a handler to httpUploadProgress like this.

    s3Upload.on('httpUploadProgress', (progress: { loaded: number; total: number; part: number; key: string }): void => {
        console.log(progress); // { loaded: 4915, total: 192915, part: 1, key: 'foo.jpg' }
    });

Now create the archiver

    const archive = Archiver('zip');
    archive.on('error', (error: Archiver.ArchiverError) => { throw new Error(`${error.name} ${error.code} ${error.message} ${error.path} ${error.stack}`); });

Now we can connect the archiver to pipe data to the upload stream and append all the download streams to it

    await new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

        console.log('Starting upload');

        s3Upload.on('close', resolve);
        s3Upload.on('end', resolve);
        s3Upload.on('error', reject);

        archive.pipe(s3StreamUpload);
        s3DownloadStreams.forEach((streamDetails: S3DownloadStreamDetails) => archive.append(streamDetails.stream, { name: streamDetails.filename }));
        archive.finalize();
    }).catch((error: { code: string; message: string; data: string }) => { throw new Error(`${error.code} ${error.message} ${error.data}`); });

Finally wait for the uploader to finish

    await s3Upload.promise();

and you're done.

I've tested this with +10GB archives and it works like a charm. I hope this has helped you out.

Discussion (30)

Samet Gunaydin • Oct 2 '19 • Edited

Thanks for the post!

Here are the typos.

Now for our array of ~~keys~~/keys, we can iterate ~~ofter~~/after it to create the S3StreamDetails objects

Now we can connect the archiver to pipe ~~date~~/data to the upload stream and append all the download streams to it

With s3StreamUpload variable, you mean s3Upload?

arautela • Jul 22 '20

Hi Samet,

I am getting an error which says "The request signature we calculated does not match the signature you provided. Check your key and signing method." when I execute await s3Upload.promise() in the end. Any help will be highly appreciated.

My code is below

var aws = require("aws-sdk");
const s3 = new aws.S3();
aws.config.update({
accessKeyId: 'my-access-key',
secretAccessKey: 'my-secret'
});

const _archiver = require('archiver');
var stream = require('stream');

const bucketName = 'myBucket';
const zipFileName = 'zipper.zip';

const streamPassThrough = new stream.PassThrough();
var params = {
ACL: 'private',
Body: streamPassThrough,
Bucket: bucketName,
ContentType: 'application/zip',
Key: zipFileName
};

//This returns us a stream.. consider it as a real pipe sending fluid to S3 bucket.. Don't forget it
const s3Upload = s3.upload(params,
(err, resp) => {
if (err) {
console.error('Got error creating stream to s3 ${ err.name } ${ err.message } ${ err.stack }');
throw err;
}
console.log(resp);
});

exports.handler = async (_req, _ctx, _cb) => {
var _keys = ['PDF/00CRO030.pdf', 'PDF/MM07200231.pdf'];

var _s3DownloadStreams = await Promise.all(_keys.map(_key => new Promise((_resolve, _reject) => {
    s3.getObject({ Bucket: bucketName, Key: _key }).promise()
        .then(_data => _resolve(
            { data: _data.Body, name: `${_key.split('/').pop()}` })
        );
}
))).catch(_err => { throw new Error(_err) } );

await new Promise((_resolve, _reject) => {
    // var _myStream = s3Upload(bucketName, zipFileName);       //Now we instantiate that pipe...
    var _archive = _archiver('zip');
    _archive.on('error', err => { throw new Error(err); });

    //Your promise gets resolved when the fluid stops running... so that's when you get to close and resolve
    s3Upload.on('close', _resolve());
    s3Upload.on('end', _resolve());
    s3Upload.on('error', _reject());

    _archive.pipe(streamPassThrough);           //Pass that pipe to _archive so it can push the fluid straigh down to S3 bucket
    _s3DownloadStreams.forEach(_itm => _archive.append(_itm.data, { name: _itm.name }));        //And then we start adding files to it
    _archive.finalize();                //Tell is, that's all we want to add. Then when it finishes, the promise will resolve in one of those events up there
}).catch(_err => {
    throw new Error(_err)
});
console.log(params);
await s3Upload.promise().catch(_err => {
    console.log('Error Is : ' + _err)
});
//_cb(null, {});        //Handle response back to server

};

Samet Gunaydin • Jul 23 '20

Did you double check your accessKeyId and secretAccessKey? There might be a space before or after your keys (access key or secret key).

arautela • Jul 23 '20

Hi Samet, yes I checked and the credentials are correct. However, I am able to download the bytes array from Keys array using s3.getObject.

Is there something which I am missing?

Samet Gunaydin • Jul 23 '20

Could you compare your implementation with this?

github.com/rokumatsumoto/aws-node-...

Also please share your implementation with gist link (gist.github.com/)

Pedro Rosón Fdez • Nov 26 '20

The difference is this one I posted here dev.to/prosonf/comment/18d6d, the handlers on close, end and error.

byvalue-yogev • Jan 4 '20 • Edited

I've just finished implementing with the help of Samet <3, thank you both!

I had to change:

s3Upload.on('close', resolve);
s3Upload.on('end', resolve);
s3Upload.on('error', reject);
to:
s3Upload.on('close', resolve());
s3Upload.on('end', resolve());
s3Upload.on('error', reject());
if not the promise doesn't resolves and the code after:
await s3Upload.promise();
doesn't execute

Benedikt Schmeitz • Oct 30 '19

s3StreamUpload should be replaced by streamPassThrough.

Gordon Johnston • Oct 5 '19

Many thanks. Post updated!

Paweł Kowalski • Sep 12 '19

Great post. I was just trying to do the same thing couple days back (ATM im keeping things in memory before uploading) and failed. I dont need more than ~500MB, but i believe streams are more efficient anyways - better safe than sorry.

BTW. When you operate on a lot of files, using keepAlive can help a lot - theburningmonk.com/2019/02/lambda-...

Also, importing only s3 client from SDK and bundling lambda with webpack makes its cold start much faster - theburningmonk.com/2019/03/just-ho...

Paweł Kowalski • Sep 13 '19

Ah, i just noticed, that i have opposite case. I have a zip file that i want to extract, which seems to be a little bit different, because you have to stream zip file, but to upload a file to s3 you need a key, and thats a problem ;-)

bonwon • Sep 18 '19

That case is detailed at medium.com/@johnpaulhayes/how-extr....

Paweł Kowalski • Sep 18 '19 • Edited

Read the zip file from S3 using the Boto3 S3 resource Object into a BytesIO buffer object

Yeah, buffer.

Thats what ive got, i wanted to have streams to have possibility to support big files, not files that can fit into memory.

This guy is calling 500MB huge because thats the max temp size on lambda (which would be ok, but realistically, saving extracted files to tmp just to upload them to s3 is kind of wasteful and nobody should do that anyways), well, for me thats not huge at all, i was aiming at couple GBs for a good measure.

Also when he writes This method does not use up disk space and therefore is not limited by size. he is wrong. Limit is limited, and it would be far less than 3GB (max possible memory on lambda), depending on file types (binary/text) and their number.

Dimas Crocco • Mar 17 '20

Hello, thanks for sharing the solution. For those who want to understand what is going on under the hood or if you are facing issues (Timeout errors, memory issues, etc.) please, take some time to READ THIS excellent issue on github.
There you can find a client/server example to reproduce all this operation and also different directions to take down this kind of problem (zip generation/download on s3).

Pedro Rosón Fdez • Nov 26 '20

These handlers are wrong:

        s3Upload.on('close', resolve);
        s3Upload.on('end', resolve);
        s3Upload.on('error', reject);

They have to be over streamPassThrough:

        streamPassThrough.on('close', resolve);
        streamPassThrough.on('end', resolve);
        streamPassThrough.on('error', reject);

Victor S'mith • Dec 17 '20

Hello, it worked for me:

s3Upload.on('close', resolv());
s3Upload.on('end', resolve());
s3Upload.on('error', reject());

Rakesh P • Feb 25 '20 • Edited

Hi All,

I know People need to work it out on their own, but still i am hoping this would save some time for others. Here's plain Nodejs Code in javascript. I have tested this out for around 1GB so far for my requirement. worked like a charm. :-)

// create readstreams for all the output files and store them
lReqFiles.forEach(function(tFileKey){
s3FileReadStreams.push({
"stream": UTIL_S3.S3.getObject({
Bucket: CFG.aws.s3.bucket,
Key: tFileKey
}).createReadStream(),
"filename": tFileKey
});
});
//
const Stream = STREAM.Stream;
const streamPassThrough = new Stream.PassThrough();
// Create a zip archive using streamPassThrough style for the linking request in s3bucket
outputFile = ${CFG.aws.s3.outputDir}/archives/${lReqId}.zip;
const params = {
ACL: 'private',
Body: streamPassThrough,
Bucket: CFG.aws.s3.bucket,
ContentType: 'application/zip',
Key: outputFile
};
const s3Upload = UTIL_S3.S3.upload(params, (err, resp) => {
if (err) {
console.error(Got error creating stream to s3 ${err.name} ${err.message} ${err.stack});
throw err;
}
console.log(resp);
}).on('httpUploadProgress', (progress) => {
console.log(progress); // { loaded: 4915, total: 192915, part: 1, key: 'foo.jpg' }
});
// create the archiver
const archive = Archiver('zip');
archive.on('error', (error) => {
throw new Error(${error.name} ${error.code} ${error.message} ${error.path} ${error.stack});
});
// connect the archiver to upload streamPassThrough and pipe all the download streams to it
await new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
console.log("Starting upload of the output Files Zip Archive");
//
s3Upload.on('close', resolve());
s3Upload.on('end', resolve());
s3Upload.on('error', reject());
//
archive.pipe(streamPassThrough);
s3FileReadStreams.forEach((s3FileDwnldStream) => {
archive.append(s3FileDwnldStream.stream, { name: s3FileDwnldStream.filename })
});
archive.finalize();
//
}).catch((error) => {
throw new Error(${error.code} ${error.message} ${error.data});
});
//
// Finally wait for the uploader to finish
await s3Upload.promise();
//

Rakesh P • Feb 27 '20

Adding this helped for a stable connection as @pawal-kowalski suggested

// setup sslAgent KeepAlive to true in AWS-SDK config for stable results
const AWS = require('aws-sdk');
const https = require('https');
const sslAgent = new https.Agent({
KeepAlive: true,
rejectUnauthorized: true
});
sslAgent.setMaxListeners(0);
AWS.config.update({
httpOptions: {
agent: sslAgent,
}
});
//

Yasen Velichkov • Oct 23 '19 • Edited

Hi Gordon,

do you have your code somewhere? Neither your steps, nor the code from stackoverflow.com/questions/386335... works for me and I am afraid it's beyond my knowledge to make it work in a Lambda.

Thanks!

Samet Gunaydin • Oct 30 '19

Hi Yasen,

github.com/rokumatsumoto/aws-node-...

I can help, if you have any questions.

Bimal Kumar • Feb 5 '20

This doesn't work if I have more than 2K small files(each file is size <100KB) on S3. I tried increasing lambda RAM to maximum, but upload doesn't start and lambda times out after 15 minutes. I'm guessing it's due to so many readable streams getting created or some issue with archiver package. Can you suggest something for this case?

Dimas Crocco • Mar 17 '20

please check this issue to understand what is going on and how to solve it

williamlecable • Mar 16 '20

Hi everyone,
I have some problems with lamda. First, compilation is blocked by :
s3Upload.on('close', resolve());
s3Upload.on('end', resolve());
s3Upload.on('error', reject());

'"close"' is not assignable to parameter of type '"httpUploadProgress"'
'"end"' is not assignable to parameter of type '"httpUploadProgress"'
'"error"' is not assignable to parameter of type '"httpUploadProgress"'

And when I try to call the lambda CloudWatch throw this error :
{
"errorType": "Runtime.UnhandledPromiseRejection",
"errorMessage": "TypeError: archiver_1.Archiver is not a function",
"reason": {
"errorType": "TypeError",
"errorMessage": "archiver_1.Archiver is not a function",
"stack": [
"TypeError: archiver_1.Archiver is not a function",
" at Function.generatePackage (/var/task/dist/src/service/package.service.js:77:36)",
" at /var/task/dist/src/service/package.service.js:40:34",
" at Array.forEach ()",
" at /var/task/dist/src/service/package.service.js:39:17",
" at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:94:5)"
]
}
}

Did you have some advices in order to resolve that 2 errors ?
Thanks a lot.

Aroh Sunday • Jul 20 '20

Import archive this way

import Archive from "archive"

With that, you will not get Archive is not a function again

lj91421 • Mar 10

This has been really useful and straightforward to get working but i am having issues with unit testing.
Has anyone been able to write jest unit tests for this? I am trying to use AWSMock for AWS and i am struggling to get a test working at the moment

Kevin Kirchner • Jan 19

I was really hoping to find a PHP version of this solution! I'm happy it's possible in node at least!

Aroh Sunday • Jul 20 '20 • Edited

I tried zipping operation with archive module following the way you did but always get memory over usage error

Etienne Fontaine • Sep 1 '20

Hi! Thank you for your article.
Do you have a benchmark for this ? Like how long does it takes to zip 100 files of 1Mo or 50 files of 2Mo for exemple ?

Thank you