Grammarly is really awesome, especially for a non-native speaker like me.
But I have to admit, after I worked with a few human editors for a while, Grammarly felt rather basic. Also, I had the realization that many things Grammarly highlights are just matter of taste and not bad writing.
Five editors would change five different things in my texts, haha.
BD in CS π Azure Developer at Nebula π₯ Web Developer π Blogger βπ» Always Learning
π Minimalism and Performance βοΈ Lover of JAMStack and Eleventy β€οΈ
I agree with you, but two things Grammarly helps you to do are avoiding common mistakes and making your vocabulary broader. I donβt see it as a tool that can replace a native English editor.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Grammarly is really awesome, especially for a non-native speaker like me.
But I have to admit, after I worked with a few human editors for a while, Grammarly felt rather basic. Also, I had the realization that many things Grammarly highlights are just matter of taste and not bad writing.
Five editors would change five different things in my texts, haha.
I agree with you, but two things Grammarly helps you to do are avoiding common mistakes and making your vocabulary broader. I donβt see it as a tool that can replace a native English editor.