DEV Community

Cover image for Azure Application Gateway for dummies
Kai Walter
Kai Walter

Posted on • Updated on

Azure Application Gateway for dummies

#azure #gateway #network

Motivation

I've been setting up Azure Application Gateway now for some years in various scenarios. As it is a quite versatile resource and I really always have to get my ducks in a row before I start applying it to a certain scenario. So this post here is merely a reference for myself - my future dummy me. By taking you along, maybe you also gain some information out of this post.

What is Application Gateway?

Azure Application Gateway is a layer 7 - application layer - load balancer and reverse proxy including an optional WAF - Web Application Firewall - to inspect and even block traffic towards a web application. Web application already suggests that it is only designed with HTTP/HTTPS traffic. On the other hand Azure Loadbalancer works on layer 4 - the transport layer - and hence is independent of application layer protocols - but of course can also handle HTTP/HTTPS.

More material:

Fun fact: although Application Gateway seems to be intended to front a bunch of VMs producing ones web application content and functionality, I never used it for such a scenario; I don't do web applications and APIs like that - I always try to follow a PaaS-first approach

What are the primitives in Application Gateway?

I do not want to repeat all the material that is already out there and rather focus on the various components and their role in the orchestration of the gateway.

For that I assembled this schematic overview with the most important components - or the components for the most common scenarios I had so far:

Application Gateway schematic view

I will try to explain these components by following a hypothetical traffic flow - so that it should be easier at which point of a flow the components come into play. This textual explanation is complemented with a corresponding Bicep template in API version 2021-05-01 - using Bicep here because it offers the least noise (compared to ARM, Pulumi, Terraform, ...) to show the essence of what configuration options are available.

To understand configuration options in detail I usually check out Azure REST API for Application Gateways - Create Or Update (or any other resource) and then transfer back to the Infrastructure-as-Code stack I use.

Abbreviations used

short long
AG Azure Application Gateway
APIM Azure API Management
CNAME DNS CNAME Resource Record
FQDN Fully qualified domain name
VNET virtual network

Ingress

First let's pick up incoming traffic. This is done with an entry in frontendIPConfigurations. Here I can specify whether to pick up from a public IP address - another Azure resource external to AG, a private address in the gateway subnet or a private link configuration - specified in another section of the AG.

For the most common scenario, public IP, while DNS related referencing (e.g. putting a CNAME on the FQDN provided by Azure) is targetted towards this public IP resource, actual SSL certificate valid for the FQDN has to be linked or uploaded to AG.



    frontendIPConfigurations: [
      {
        id: 'string'
        name: 'string'
        properties: {
          privateIPAddress: 'string'
          privateIPAllocationMethod: 'string'
          privateLinkConfiguration: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          publicIPAddress: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          subnet: {
            id: 'string'
          }
        }
      }
    ]
    privateLinkConfigurations: [
      {
        id: 'string'
        name: 'string'
        properties: {
          ipConfigurations: [
            {
              id: 'string'
              name: 'string'
              properties: {
                primary: bool
                privateIPAddress: 'string'
                privateIPAllocationMethod: 'string'
                subnet: {
                  id: 'string'
                }
              }
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    ]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

a sample for a private link configuration can be found in my post, where I use it to make an APIM instance available for another VNET without peering

Next element is an entry in httpListeners, frontendPorts and sslCertificates (in case HTTPS traffic is to be processed). httpListener picks up from a frontendIPConfiguration (to be referenced) and specifies which port (443, 80, 8080, ...) and protocol (Https, Http) is to be used. A configuration for Https requires that a certificate is made available to AG, either by specifying with data or keyVaultSecretId in sslCertificates. When using a HTTP-01 certificate challenge I often add a HTTP configuration like in this post which points to a temporary backend handling the challenge. Also I then make the Http / Https configuration switchable like in this sample - so as long as no certificate is yet bound on the AG I configure e.g. with protocol/port Http/8080 and then switch immediately to protocol/port Https/443 when certificate is uploaded.

Best is not to point to actual backends as long as Https is not activated!



    httpListeners: [
      {
        id: 'string'
        name: 'string'
        properties: {
          customErrorConfigurations: [
            {
              customErrorPageUrl: 'string'
              statusCode: 'string'
            }
          ]
          firewallPolicy: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          frontendIPConfiguration: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          frontendPort: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          hostName: 'string'
          hostNames: [
            'string'
          ]
          protocol: 'string'
          requireServerNameIndication: bool
          sslCertificate: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          sslProfile: {
            id: 'string'
          }
        }
      }
    ]
    frontendPorts: [
      {
        id: 'string'
        name: 'string'
        properties: {
          port: int
        }
      }
    ]
    sslCertificates: [
      {
        id: 'string'
        name: 'string'
        properties: {
          data: 'string'
          keyVaultSecretId: 'string'
          password: 'string'
        }
      }
    ]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

SSL processing can additionally be adapted to your requirements with these elements - but would not necessarily be required:



    sslPolicy: {
      cipherSuites: [
        'string'
      ]
      disabledSslProtocols: [
        'string'
      ]
      minProtocolVersion: 'string'
      policyName: 'string'
      policyType: 'string'
    }
    sslProfiles: [
      {
        id: 'string'
        name: 'string'
        properties: {
          clientAuthConfiguration: {
            verifyClientCertIssuerDN: bool
          }
          sslPolicy: {
            cipherSuites: [
              'string'
            ]
            disabledSslProtocols: [
              'string'
            ]
            minProtocolVersion: 'string'
            policyName: 'string'
            policyType: 'string'
          }
          trustedClientCertificates: [
            {
              id: 'string'
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    ]
    trustedClientCertificates: [
      {
        id: 'string'
        name: 'string'
        properties: {
          data: 'string'
        }
      }
    ]
    trustedRootCertificates: [
      {
        id: 'string'
        name: 'string'
        properties: {
          data: 'string'
          keyVaultSecretId: 'string'
        }
      }
    ]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Specifying backend(s)

No we assume traffic is inside the gateway and we have to determine where to send it to. An entry in backendAddressPools with the backendAddresses array specifies traffic targets. Either FQDN or IP addresses can be specified. When using FQDNs AG needs to be able to DNS resolve the domain - so DNS configuration needs to facilitate what is required here.

A common mistake in scenarios where AG is used to integrate APIM in an internal VNET is, that {apim-service-name}.azure-api.net would not point to the internal IP address and hence FQDN would not resolve correctly. In this scenario ipAddress has to be used but when integrated APIM services is operated on HTTPS, the service expects to be addressed with the correct Host HTTP header {apim-service-name}.azure-api.net, hence either pickHostNameFromBackendAddress or a specific hostName has to be specified in the corresponding backendHttpSettingsCollection entry. Same goes for the entry in probes.

IMPORTANT: the probe really has to be able to find and get a valid response from the backend. When the probe is not healthy - this can by checked in Azure Portal or az network application-gateway show-backend-health -n {appGwName} - AG will not forward traffic and reward you with a 502 bad gateway error.



    backendAddressPools: [
      {
        id: 'string'
        name: 'string'
        properties: {
          backendAddresses: [
            {
              fqdn: 'string'
              ipAddress: 'string'
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    ]
    backendHttpSettingsCollection: [
      {
        id: 'string'
        name: 'string'
        properties: {
          affinityCookieName: 'string'
          authenticationCertificates: [
            {
              id: 'string'
            }
          ]
          connectionDraining: {
            drainTimeoutInSec: int
            enabled: bool
          }
          cookieBasedAffinity: 'string'
          hostName: 'string'
          path: 'string'
          pickHostNameFromBackendAddress: bool
          port: int
          probe: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          probeEnabled: bool
          protocol: 'string'
          requestTimeout: int
          trustedRootCertificates: [
            {
              id: 'string'
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    ]
    probes: [
      {
        id: 'string'
        name: 'string'
        properties: {
          host: 'string'
          interval: int
          match: {
            body: 'string'
            statusCodes: [
              'string'
            ]
          }
          minServers: int
          path: 'string'
          pickHostNameFromBackendHttpSettings: bool
          port: int
          protocol: 'string'
          timeout: int
          unhealthyThreshold: int
        }
      }
    ]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

For APIM the status endpoint can be used to be referenced in a probe:



    probes: [
      {
        name: 'api-gateway-probe'
        properties: {
          protocol: 'Https'
          port: 443
          path: '/status-0123456789abcdef'
          interval: 15
          timeout: 15
          host: apiGatewayHostname
          unhealthyThreshold: 3
          match: {
            statusCodes: [
              '200'
            ]
          }
        }
      }
    ]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Request processing

Having specified ingress and backend, those components can we wired together with an entry in requestRoutingRules. ruleType Basic forwards all traffic 1:1. Limiting fowarding only for certain paths can be achieved with ruleType PathBasedRouting and entries in urlPathMaps. With rewriteRuleSets some basic rewriting of the request is possible.



    requestRoutingRules: [
      {
        id: 'string'
        name: 'string'
        properties: {
          backendAddressPool: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          backendHttpSettings: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          httpListener: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          loadDistributionPolicy: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          priority: int
          redirectConfiguration: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          rewriteRuleSet: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          ruleType: 'string'
          urlPathMap: {
            id: 'string'
          }
        }
      }
    ]
    rewriteRuleSets: [
      {
        id: 'string'
        name: 'string'
        properties: {
          rewriteRules: [
            {
              actionSet: {
                requestHeaderConfigurations: [
                  {
                    headerName: 'string'
                    headerValue: 'string'
                  }
                ]
                responseHeaderConfigurations: [
                  {
                    headerName: 'string'
                    headerValue: 'string'
                  }
                ]
                urlConfiguration: {
                  modifiedPath: 'string'
                  modifiedQueryString: 'string'
                  reroute: bool
                }
              }
              conditions: [
                {
                  ignoreCase: bool
                  negate: bool
                  pattern: 'string'
                  variable: 'string'
                }
              ]
              name: 'string'
              ruleSequence: int
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    ]
    urlPathMaps: [
      {
        id: 'string'
        name: 'string'
        properties: {
          defaultBackendAddressPool: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          defaultBackendHttpSettings: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          defaultLoadDistributionPolicy: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          defaultRedirectConfiguration: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          defaultRewriteRuleSet: {
            id: 'string'
          }
          pathRules: [
            {
              id: 'string'
              name: 'string'
              properties: {
                backendAddressPool: {
                  id: 'string'
                }
                backendHttpSettings: {
                  id: 'string'
                }
                firewallPolicy: {
                  id: 'string'
                }
                loadDistributionPolicy: {
                  id: 'string'
                }
                paths: [
                  'string'
                ]
                redirectConfiguration: {
                  id: 'string'
                }
                rewriteRuleSet: {
                  id: 'string'
                }
              }
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    ]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

sample ruleset for client certificate extraction

One common scenario is to extract the client certificate with AG and then pass it to a downstream services:



    rewriteRuleSets: [
      {
        name: 'extract-client-cert'
        properties: {
          rewriteRules: [
            {
              ruleSequence: 100
              name: 'extract-cllient-cert'
              actionSet: {
                requestHeaderConfigurations: [
                  {
                    headerName: 'X-ARR-ClientCert'
                    headerValue: '{var_client_certificate}'
                  }
                ]
              }
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    ]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

server variables that can be used for such a rewrite

Egress

The entry in gatewayIPConfigurations tells AG to which subnet the traffic is sent to.

Some limitations I experienced:

  • the gateway subnet can only contain AG resources, no other Azure resources; also when migrating from AG v1 to v2 those could not be mixed in the same subnet; this also means when doing the AG to APIM internal integrations, that APIM has to reside in a different subnet
  • a private link on the AG has to be in the same VNET, but a different subnet




gatewayIPConfigurations: [
  {
    id: 'string'
    name: 'string'
    properties: {
      subnet: {
        id: 'string'
      }
    }
  }
]






    Enter fullscreen mode
    


    Exit fullscreen mode
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode




Conclusion

I know I did not touch all components and configuration options in Application Gateway with this post. I only showed the essential ones which are required to get traffic passing through AG.

Anyway I hope this information is useful to anybody out there. As mentioned and as you can see from the samples I provided, Application Gateway is an elementary component in many of the VNET isolated workloads I build. Hence my future me will certainly come back here from time to time ... fix typos and probably also add more findings and specifics.

Top comments (7)

Collapse
 
kaiwalter profile image
Kai Walter •

added sample ruleset for client certificate extraction

Collapse
 
odenorde profile image
Odenorde •

Hey Kai,

One of the possibilities in SSL profile is to add multiple trustedclientcertificates. In my bicep code I loop through multiple SSL profiles, but I'm struggling adding a child loop to add multiple trustedclientcertificates associated with a SSL profile. Is this something you are familiar with?

Collapse
 
kaiwalter profile image
Kai Walter • • Edited

Hi @odenor , so basically a nested loop? Not yet. I just checked the 2 main huge repositories with Bicep templates I have at hand but did not see anything that could help.

Does this maybe help: ochzhen.com/blog/nested-loops-in-a...

Collapse
 
jayded profile image
Jayded •

That page you link, solution 1 is a bit weird. He says you can't nest loops but then still does it. Must be me that doesn't understand i guess. Anyway...
With application gateway bicep implementation the real problem starts when you have multiple rewriteRuleSets, that have multiple rewriteRules, that have multiple conditions.
I have fixed this in the past by using modules. For instance to loop the creation of subnets within a bicep that creates multiple vnets.
Since rewriteRuleSets are not a subresource you can't make modules of it as far as I understand.
I'm now looking at that page's solution 2 where you make your module return an array object of the nested parameters.
If you ever figure this out, do share :)

Thread Thread
 
kaiwalter profile image
Kai Walter • • Edited

@jayded Is this what you want to achieve?
Image description

I am feeding in 2 arrays:

param clientCerts array
param sslProfileNames array
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Build variables to hold the trusted client certs, their resource Ids and the SSL profiles:

var trustedClientCertificates = [for i in range(0, length(clientCerts)): {
  name: 'client${i}'
  properties: {
    data: clientCerts[i]
  }
}]

var trustedClientCertificateResourceIds = [for i in range(0, length(clientCerts)): {
  id: resourceId('Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways/trustedClientCertificates', appGwName, 'client${i}')
}]

var sslProfiles = [for name in sslProfileNames: {
  name: name
  properties: {
    trustedClientCertificates: trustedClientCertificateResourceIds
    clientAuthConfiguration: {
      verifyClientCertIssuerDN: true
    }
  }
}]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

and then later use the variables in the resource:

resource appgw 'Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways@2022-01-01' = {
  name: appGwName
  location: location
  properties: {
    sku: {
      name: 'Standard_v2'
      tier: 'Standard_v2'
    }
    autoscaleConfiguration: {
      minCapacity: appGwMinCapacity
      maxCapacity: appGwMaxCapacity
    }
    trustedClientCertificates: trustedClientCertificates
    sslProfiles: sslProfiles
...
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
Thread Thread
 
jayded profile image
Jayded •

Hey, thanks for posting your code.

It's very similar.
I also solved it by making a module that outputs arrays. Then looping those arrays into my rewrireRuleSets.

I realy hope at a certain point they'll allow us to nest for's. Would make our lives a lot easier.

ps: agw was by far the hardest part to put into code to be fair. Even stuff like our apim was a lot easier to implement.

Thread Thread
 
kaiwalter profile image
Kai Walter •

I know - that is why I made this post

Read next

glaucia86 profile image

This Month in Azure Static Web Apps | 08/2024

Glaucia Lemos -

kkazala profile image

Change Management in Infrastructure as a Code (IaC)

Kinga -

maxx_don profile image

Publish Dacpac to Azure SQL with Entra-only authentication using GitHub Actions

Massimiliano Donini -

femolacaster profile image

Let’s talk about some cool Azure AI Speech SDK/API Endpoint

femolacaster -